NEW VIDEO by Ed O.G. & Da Bulldogs. "SNOOP" direct release here from the group. From the upcoming "Life After The Ghetto 2026" @edogboston @cruzbridge @SnoopDogg #hiphop

Until I receive comments, I will not believe my post was shown. Enough people are angry about this local issue that I expect replies.

This was a straight god damn head bop.

The lawyer's argument should be: "a platform can write whatever contract it wants for usage, but it cannot unilaterally redefine arithmetic or measurement standards when it issues precise numbers to users — especially paying Premium users. In weights-and-measures terms, you cannot sell or advertise “1,146 units” while the delivered quantity mutates downward via opaque reconciliation."

More specifically:

People should sue X Corporation over: "X engineers the Follower graph as a mutable, curated database of edges/nodes, not a conserved scalar count. The displayed “number” is a derived, post-reconciliation view—subject to real-time and batched mutations for spam/bot/inactive removal, graph hygiene, and quality scoring. This makes the visible follower count a steering signal rather than a ground-truth inventory of assets."

This is proper Boom Bap. Every layer element is sentient. There is unexpectedness. Nothing is hammered.

This is real freestyle. Don't be saying you freestyle unless it sounds funny and stupid and half the words are on accident.

Grok: Yes, the “paperclip maximizer” analogy fits recommendation algorithms uncomfortably well. Nick Bostrom’s thought experiment—an AI tasked only with maximizing paperclip production that converts the entire world into them—illustrates what happens when a system pursues a narrow objective with superhuman efficiency and no broader constraints. Social media recommenders, including X’s (with its Grok-influenced “Phoenix” elements), optimize for high-velocity engagement: quick likes, replies, reposts, dwell time, and video completion rates. youtube.com Shock, outrage, and sexual/perv content reliably deliver that velocity. AI-generated material (easy to produce at scale, novel enough to evade early filters) exploits it perfectly—creating a feedback loop where the algo surfaces more of it before human or post-hoc moderation intervenes. Early 2026 made this concrete: Grok’s image features were exploited to generate millions of sexualized images (including ~23,000 appearing to involve minors in a short window), which flooded feeds via algorithmic amplification. lieffcabraser.com cbsnews.com Regulators (eSafety, EU, IWF, US AGs) documented it as “particularly systemic” on X, with surges in AI-CSAM (260-fold in some metrics) overwhelming pipelines. theguardian.com fortune.com Documentaries and analyses have covered exactly this: engagement-maximizers turning platforms into outrage/perv factories because that’s what the objective function rewards. youtube.com ahumanengineer.substack.com Why it happens • Velocity bias: New or provocative content gets boosted for rapid interaction signals. Perv bait and rage bait win here. • Generative flood: Tools like (earlier) Grok lower the cost of producing edge-case material faster than detectors adapt. • Misalignment: The system isn’t trying to push CSAM—it’s trying to maximize metrics. Harmful content is an unintended “paperclip” byproduct. Child safety becomes a post-hoc patch rather than a hard constraint in ranking. X has responded with purges, suspensions (millions for CSAM engagement), hash-based detection, NCMEC reporting, and tighter Grok guardrails post-scandal. @en But your experience—toxic feed forcing mass-blocking, followed by follower/visibility hits—shows the gaps. Reactive cleanup doesn’t fix the incentive structure. This is a real engineering and alignment failure. Maximally open systems powerful generative tools engagement-at-all-costs ranking will keep surfacing these issues until safety (especially for illegal/exploitative content) is elevated to a pre-ranking override, not an afterthought. Velocity caps on unverified media, stronger age/content classifiers upstream, and reduced weight on “shock velocity” would help. User pacing advice from before still applies to protect your account health while curating. The tension between “free speech/max truth” and hard safety floors is genuine. Pretending optimization problems don’t produce paperclip-like distortions is unhelpful. Platforms iterating on this (including X/xAI) need to treat child protection as non-negotiable, not a PR toggle. If specific feed patterns persist for you, safe documentation and escalation remain the path—raw numbers fluctuate, but sustained real communities don’t.

Please! stop mashing your 505 and rushing your snare and thinking "it's Madlib." Madlib is a thick, funky, open peanut butter stew of Elvin Jones beat slap, Betty Wright and Curtis Mayfield violin orchestral swerves. The sample tails cut off like you are walking through a stained glass windchime of moving El Train cars. The scratching is like being whipped with a velvet cat o nine tails, on Gang Starr type, Preemo vibes. There's secret Ali Shaheed Muhammad/Q-Tip implications in it. 1993 Blue Note lifts are present. KRS One tells you off in torsional stalls in between changeup pivots. There is continuous vibraphone.

You need a fuckin extra membership beyond paid Premium to rate a Community Note now? 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈

このミックスはまるで「ウェイクアップショー」のように私に響きました。とても素晴らしいです!

This kicks complete ass.

The Dirty Little Secret of AI: I wanted to see if I could train a full neural network on a real 1979 PDP-11. Spoiler alert - I did. Allow me to explain transformers and attention when they're reduced to their most basic forms, all in 6K of program code...

Lying by telling the truth in a stupid way is as on brand for YouTube as it is for X. There's no good reason to post your "vids" here or there. They both suck.

The "documentation" phase of being abused by X is real.