I track scientific controversies

Joined January 2018
18,072 Photos and videos
The documentary I'm putting together is VERY long, is really more like a freshman-level university course on scientific controversies. First of its kind. Will include curated reading materials, short videos, thought-provoking conversations some relevant comedy.
8
2
25
1,757
I'll never get over the fact that John D Rockefeller created our current biomedical system w its pharmaceuticals-from-oil-byproducts in order to maximize his profits. John was the child of a snake oil salesman who saw an opportunity TOOK IT, then hid the fact of its taking.
1
1
25
He could get away w doing that bc he also took control of our educational system.
1
1
21
Not a good man, sorry.
10
Controversies of Science retweeted
14
126
300
3,737
The most fervent biolab promoters are some of the most vocal defenders of virology. But, they don't actually defend virology; they act outraged that you questioned it. It's quite the reaction! I've lost faith in a couple of accounts I was following, tbh.
1
44
You can do all of the research for them, they will act like it's all shit. But, there's no real discussion of the technical points.
1
33
For me, that is a fake interaction that resulted from an attempt to get somebody to think.
23
Controversies of Science retweeted
Scientists Map 110 Quadrillion km of Underground Fungal Networks… A billion Times The Distance From Earth to the Sun! Earth’s Vast Underground “Carbon Superhighway” A groundbreaking new study published today in the journal Science has revealed, for the first time, the global scale of one of Earth’s most important but hidden biological infrastructures: the networks of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. These thread-like fungal structures, known as hyphae, form symbiotic partnerships with roughly 70% of land plant species—including major crops like wheat, corn, and rice. In exchange for sugars from the plants, the fungi deliver essential nutrients (such as phosphorus and nitrogen) and water, while also playing a massive role in storing carbon underground. Mind-Boggling Scale Using data from more than 16,000 soil cores worldwide, machine-learning models, and high-resolution robotic imaging of fungal hyphae, researchers estimated: •Total length: ~110 quadrillion kilometers (1.10 × 10¹⁷ km) of living hyphae in the top 15 cm of global soils—enough to stretch nearly a billion times the distance from Earth to the Sun (or about 10% of the diameter of the Milky Way if laid out in space). •Biomass: ~300 megatons of carbon, equivalent to 4–6 times the biomass of all humans on Earth. •These networks move about 1 billion metric tons of carbon per year into soils, acting as a critical “carbon circulatory system” that helps regulate the planet’s climate. Densities are highest in grasslands, with notable hotspots in places like the Sudd wetlands in Africa and the Everglades. The “Wood Wide Web” at Planetary Scale This research builds on the popular “Wood Wide Web” concept, where fungi connect plants in shared resource networks. The new global maps (available for exploration via the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks, or SPUN) show these connections operating at an ecosystem-wide level, supporting plant health, resilience to drought and disease, and food security. These fungi are vital allies in the fight against climate change and for sustainable agriculture. However, they face threats from soil disturbance (like tillage), pesticides, and land-use changes. The study also highlights gaps in sampling, particularly in undersampled ecosystems that need further research. Read the full research paper (paywalled, but abstract freely available): science.org/doi/10.1126/scie… 
Global density and biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks Explore interactive maps and learn more at SPUN.earth. This discovery underscores how much of Earth’s life-support systems remain invisible to the naked eye yet operate on a truly planetary scale. Protecting these underground networks could be one of the most effective ways to sustain healthy soils, productive crops, and a stable climate.
86
392
1,361
105,329
Controversies of Science retweeted
Replying to @NWS_Network
The area is known for gold mining. The process involves arsenic exposure. For the last 40 years the population has been suffering from arsenic poisoning that is being exacerbated by poverty and acute malnutrition. This is being termed Ebola. Symptoms of ebola & arsenic poisoning;
4
6
117
Controversies of Science retweeted
NdG is a media psyop to make you think "science" is an authoritative source of truth instead of a process of empirical truth seeking. He is a dogmatic, arrogant buffoon, and the psyop is making people think such a person should ever be listened to.
If I were ever abducted by Aliens, the first thing I’d ask is whether they came from a planet where people also deny science.
70
121
1,065
23,992
Controversies of Science retweeted
What about polio? It was a HOAX. They knew the vaccine was causing polio. Watch the... ln.is/3mEcZ by #LotusOak via @c0nvey
1
2
Controversies of Science retweeted
Polio hoax explained in 3 minutes.
54
2,294
4,611
98,249
Controversies of Science retweeted
IN 1910, THE FLEXNER REPORT — FUNDED BY JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER AND ANDREW CARNEGIE — SHUT DOWN OVER 100 MEDICAL SCHOOLS IN AMERICA IN A SINGLE DECADE. HOMEOPATHY, NATUROPATHY, HERBAL MEDICINE, ELECTROTHERAPY — ALL ELIMINATED. NOT BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WORK. BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T BE PATENTED. THE ENTIRE MODERN MEDICAL SYSTEM WAS DESIGNED FROM DAY ONE TO SELL PETROCHEMICAL DRUGS. Before 1910, American medicine was diverse. Doctors practiced homeopathy, naturopathy, eclectic medicine, herbal medicine, hydrotherapy, and electrotherapy alongside conventional approaches. Patients had choices. Competition existed. Many of these modalities were effective and affordable. Then Abraham Flexner — not a doctor, not a scientist, an educator — was hired by the Carnegie Foundation to evaluate every medical school in America. His report, published in 1910, recommended that only schools teaching pharmaceutical-based, laboratory-focused medicine should receive funding and accreditation. Within a decade, over 100 medical schools were closed. The number dropped from 155 to 31. Homeopathic colleges: eliminated. Naturopathic schools: defunded. Eclectic medicine programs: shut down. Electrotherapy training: erased from the curriculum entirely. Who funded this? The Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation — the same families who owned the pharmaceutical and petrochemical industries. John D. Rockefeller's father was literally a traveling snake oil salesman. His son built Standard Oil, then realized that petroleum byproducts could be patented as drugs. But first, the competition had to be destroyed. The Flexner Report was not a scientific evaluation. It was a business strategy. Eliminate every form of medicine that uses natural, unpatentable substances. Eliminate every therapy based on energy, frequency, or the body's innate healing capacity. Replace them all with patentable synthetic molecules derived from petroleum. It worked perfectly. By 1930, American medicine was a pharmaceutical monopoly. Doctors were trained exclusively to diagnose diseases and prescribe patented drugs. Nutrition was removed from medical education. Energy medicine was labeled "quackery." Prevention became irrelevant — because healthy people are not customers. Every doctor trained after 1920 was trained inside this system. Every medical textbook was funded by pharmaceutical companies. Every hospital was built on this model. The entire structure — from medical school to pharmacy to insurance — was designed as a delivery system for patentable molecules. This is not conspiracy theory. The Flexner Report is a public document. The funding sources are documented. The closure of 124 medical schools is historical fact. The Rockefeller Foundation's simultaneous investment in pharmaceutical companies is public record. You did not choose pharmaceutical medicine. It was chosen for you — in 1910 — by oil barons who needed customers for their petroleum byproducts. Everything that was eliminated still works. Frequency medicine. Herbal medicine. Electrotherapy. They were not disproven. They were defunded. There is a difference. 🔔 The Flexner Report. 1910. The day medicine became a business. Read it yourself. Share this. Source: QuantumMedicineNews
36
817
1,044
15,659
The Bad Kitty account will not even respond. I'm honestly starting to have my doubts about this account's intentions.
Replying to @pepesgrandma
I have posted every day for many months now the evidence for the non-existence of viruses, from a variety of sources using a variety of arguments. Bad Kitty follows my account. Presumably she saw a lot of that. Might as well unfollow me, Bad Kitty. You've learned NOTHING!
1
58
This account endlessly talks about gain-of-function biolabs, but cannot be bothered to think critically about what virologists mean when they say "isolation". Knowledge of the former requires testimony from shady people, whereas the latter is just critical thinking.
Here's what you missed: The origins: US Gain of function: US Millions of US taxpayer dollars laundered thru EcoHealth and USAID among others to fund the Wuhan lab: US So if the US creates it, weaponizes it, funds the foreign lab where it is released and then blames that country for its release, it seems a little disingenuous to most ppl with a functioning brain.
3
1
1,634
Controversies of Science retweeted
If you still believe in “viruses” watch this 1 minute video. How “scientists” prove “viruses” exist:
44
352
957
23,754
Controversies of Science retweeted
If you want to better understand why they want us surrounded by "magnetic fields" that can be manipulated remotely this is worth exploring.
2
2
190
Controversies of Science retweeted
They caused the Neurological Paralysis Symptoms blamed on "Polio Virus" with the known neurotoxin DDT. As is the case with Big Pharma and the establishment they had to even gaslight and ritually humiliate the public by telling them the poison was good for them.
9
92
157
3,500
Controversies of Science retweeted
BREAKING CALIFORNIA ELECTION NEWS!! 18,000 BALLOTS HAVE BEEN REJECTED BASED ON SIGNATURE – STEALING THE ELECTION FROM SPENCER PRATT OR did they? – perhaps this post should be titled… BREAKING NEWS – INFLUENCERS PUT CLICKS BEFORE TRUTH – HARMING THE ELECTION CONVERSATION MORE THAN HELPING!! Word around the internet lately, particularly in the “Election Integrity Influencer” circles, is that 18,000 Spencer Pratt voters have received letters telling them that their vote was ‘thrown out’ due to ‘signature irregularities’. So, let's look at the claim first – is it true? Short answer, No it is not true. How can I say this with certainty? Well, let's look at California law and the currently ‘in-flight’ election results. California uses signature verification to identify voters even in person – we’ll talk more about this in a minute. Mail-in ballots can only rely on your signature because you have mailed it in. You’re not there to provide anything else. So, CA law has responded to that with one of the most ‘friendly’ ballot curing laws around. What is does is gives every voter weeks to respond if there is a problem with their signature. So, could people have received letters from the state or their county about their signature on a mail-in ballot? YES Did the letter say we don’t like your signature, so we are throwing your ballot away? NO If they got a letter, it instructed them about how to ‘cure’ their ballot and the deadline for that for the CA primary election of June 2nd, is June 24th. They would also get a form to fill out and return to resolve the problem. Very convenient – too convenient – still not protecting our elections. For this post though – it is most important to understand that they did not get a letter telling them their ballot had been discarded. Actually even if they did, they could go to the California elections page and get the instructions to fix it. So this claim… “18,000 SPENCER PRATT BALLOTS HAVE BEEN THROWN AWAY” is not true Let’s get back to the second title on this post. Why is this even a story at all right now – it is because influencers want to capture your attention and your click. Sensational news gains followers. Verifying sensational news is usually challenging and in the landscape of social media, most are scrolling from one idea to the next and they don’t take the time to go ‘look it up’. THIS IS DANGEROUS It is dangerous for the truth, and it spreads ideas that are false, making everyone pursuing legitimate claims about election validity look like our claims are bogus and exaggerated - when they are not. You have heard this many times in the last 6 years in particular… BE CAREFUL WHO YOU FOLLOW and… DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH This is as relevant now as ever. The research is not always easy, but you need to do it. Do it for the info we post too. We don’t want blind followers. In fact, since our work is backed by years of data analysis by a team of about 100 Data engineers, architects and analysts, we WANT you to check our work. To confirm what we say above, check out the link below… Go to the CA voting website. Click on the link for the June 2, 2026 Primary, Click the link that says ‘How to Fix a Missing or Noncomparable Signature on Your Vote-by-Mail Ballot Return Envelope’ – it’s all there in black and white. …and when you see someone posting about the 18,000 deleted votes – spread the truth – the real truth and help others not be fooled. A quick extra note about ‘signature verification’ in lieu of ID – this is another reason why it poses a problem for our elections. The focus is usually that it does not properly protect the act of voting in the first place, but this story (even though it is bogus) shines a light on the fact that using your signature does introduce subjectivity into the process of accepting votes. A huge problem! We’ll post more on this soon. Follow us for more truth about elections. Here's that link... sos.ca.gov/elections/make-pl…. #U4F #ElectionValidity #BeCarefulWhoYouFollow

12
46
66
869
Controversies of Science retweeted
The Nobel Prize during the Polio Hoax naturally went to the person who created the DDT Poison who caused the hoax. The Establishment always reward the people whom achieve their goals. Nobel Prize winners are ALL nefarious actors- no exceptions.
18
158
334
5,304