The Pentagon has reportedly estimated the cost of the war with Iran at approximately $1 billion per day. Such a figure might be manageable if the conflict were indeed expected to be short. However, I do not share that assumption.
In my view, the developments surrounding both Venezuela and Iran should be understood in the broader context of what represent the United States’ final strategic confrontation with China. Since 2021, I have pressed on that this conflict has already begun in stages. It started with rhetoric 2010, followed by trade disputes mid 2010s, then escalated into financial warfare between roughly 2019 and 2025. The next phase was always likely to be kinetic. We now appear to be entering that stage. The kinetic stage will happen simultaneously as the financial war enters turbo mode.
For that reason, it is difficult to view this as a short war, and Iran itself is without doubt not the primary strategic focus. Rather, it represent one theater within a much larger geopolitical contest.
The $1 billion per day estimate is concerning, and it may prove to be significantly understated. Realistically, the cost could rise to $2, or even $3 billion per day depending on the scale and duration of the operations. We simply do not have the budget to sustain a continuous expansion into new adventures. What is most striking is how closely this path mirrors the one taken by the Romans in the later stages of their empire.
In this broader framework, the actions of the United States and Israel can be interpreted as part of a strategic response to China’s rise. China’s growing economic and geopolitical influence represents the most significant challenge to American global dominance in its roughly 250-year history.
Over the past several years, China has appeared relatively restrained amid the turbulence in global politics. However, that posture will not persist indefinitely. We should now expect a more visible and perhaps, a more aggressive China. When China reveals gold reserves far larger than the roughly 2,500 tonnes officially reported, probably in the range of 30,000 to 40,000 tonnes, the implications for global currency and debt markets will be an event we will not forget.
There is little we can do to influence the course of events in this situation. I have been emphasizing these conflicts for a long time, and the picture is far larger than simply a small war here or there. Regardless of what unfolds, and regardless of who ultimately comes out on top, our approach should remain focused on one clear objective: hard assets.
Are we now beginning to see what smart money is pricing into gold, which began 2023, and initially back in 2018?