Joined December 2020
6 Photos and videos
I can’t believe I happen to be in New York when the knicks win the championship - it makes me both miss the energy of this city and also want to run away from the chaos
91
Truly S tier tokenomics
Erik Voorhees explains how Venice's dual token model actually works "You can stake 100 VVV to get pro access to Venice. We take a bunch of our revenue, buy the token, and burn it" "We want to take that to its extreme and try to buy every last token we can and burn it all" "You lock up VVV to mint DIEM. Each DIEM you hold gives you $1/day to use on any AI model you want" "We built it so AI agents could hold an asset and get marginally free inference" "It changes the economic calculation. We thought that'd be an interesting design space to explore"
51
Johanna retweeted
2
23
379
Never thought I'd be that person walking around talking to myself all day into Wispr into Telegram to communicate with my Hermes agent that I set up through a VPS
51
Johanna retweeted
Venice by Voorhees is the clearest AI growth play A few broad strokes I want to point out 1/ Fundamentals wise Venice has 3 million users and Yan is estimating a 12 month forward ARR of ~$260M. This means VVV trades at 2.5x forward revenue (Circulating market cap). This is rare in Crypto especially at a time when stakeholders want real revenue. 2/ Thesis wise people desire private inference while accessing open source models without sending their data to China. This is hard to do (China APIs, or intermediaries that route anywhere). Venice is private and hosts some models on private data centers and some in an E2E TEE Fashion for extreme privacy. Yan covers all of the tiers. Venice solves the market for those who want private inference but can't setup hardware at home and dont want to send data to China. I've talked about this a lot that its very hard to find a subscription service, that is private, lets you access leading open source models with zero data retention. Enterprise wise @YanLiberman is right the enterprise no data retention plans are solid from AI Labs, but they are API based and get very expensive. With Venice you can get similar guarantees on a $68/mo subscription, if you graduate from a user to enterprise API plan for work privacy guarantees your bill goes up 10-20x (this happened to us!). Net I think more enterprises/businesses use venice than we are assuming to save money vs graduating to enteprise AI tiers for similar privacy guarantees. 3/ Founder wise Erik is the guy who took down SBF live on a podcast. He's the guy who got the entire conference going at Permissionless on AI. When Erik eventually goes up against trillion dollar centralized AI founders to share the vision of private/open source AI he will inspire folks and bring them into Venice. The best storyteller is king. 4/ Future wise I think the biggest jump is autonomous agents holding VVV/DIEM, accessing models, earning capital and buying more VVV/DIEM for more usage. Then Agents build out their entire AI economy. Disclosure I am Long $VVV. H/T @ErikVoorhees
23
32
359
44,415
$750M gone from defi in 2026. drift, kelp, now litecoin… litecoin’s MWEB was added years after launch as a privacy extension, and the exploit hit the seam between the base chain and the extension. privacy shouldn’t be an afterthought when you're dealing with this much capital
59
Not your keys, not your data…
🚨 Do you understand what’s happening?! > Lovable just got valued at $6.6 billion and a guy with a free account read another user's source code, database credentials, and AI chat history in 5 API calls.. Customers include Uber, Zendesk, Nvidia, Microsoft, Spotify. > The Lovable researcher reported the bug 48 days ago through HackerOne. They marked it a "duplicate" and closed it. It still worked the day it leaked… > Vercel got breached this week through a third-party AI tool an employee installed.. ShinyHunters listed the stolen API keys and source code on BreachForums for $2 million. > Lovable's response was "we did not suffer a data breach." Then they admitted they patched the API in November and left every project from before that date exposed.. > When you vibe code an app you paste your Stripe key into the chat. You paste your database URL into the chat. You paste customer records into the chat. The endpoint that leaked.. returned chat histories. > Anthropic built a model that scored 83.1% on finding real software vulnerabilities. Found a 27-year-old bug in OpenBSD and a 16-year-old flaw in FFmpeg. They named it Mythos and locked it behind a 50-company firewall because public release was too dangerous.. > Two of the world's biggest dev infrastructure platforms got breached in 48 hours and a $6.6B company's first instinct was to argue about the definition of the word "public..." > Every founder who shipped an MVP on Lovable in early 2025 woke up today to find their database credentials are public records.. > The trust boundaries in the AI dev stack are drawn with marker. And it's raining. If your stack ever touched a vibe coding platform, rotate everything tonight. Check the chat logs for what you forgot you typed. AI is here. And we’re f*cked.
92
We’re about to see a massive shakeup in winners / losers, and who can pivot quickly. Projects are already falling off left and right - this is just going to further the gap.
🚨NEW: New details are emerging about the latest legislative text outlining a compromise on stablecoin yield and rewards, along with early reactions from crypto industry leaders who reviewed it today. According to an internal stakeholder email shared with me, the proposal would prohibit platforms from offering yield “directly or indirectly” for holding a stablecoin or in a manner that resembles a bank deposit. The restriction would apply broadly to digital asset service providers (exchanges, brokers, etc.) and their affiliates to limit workarounds, and would bar anything “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest. The proposal would also permit activity-based rewards tied to user activity, including loyalty, promotional, or subscription programs, provided they are not deemed economically or functionally equivalent to interest. It would also direct the @SECGov, @CFTC, and @USTreasury to jointly define permissible rewards and establish anti-evasion rules within one year. One industry leader who reviewed the text today tells me the draft is a “departure” from what had been previously discussed with the White House, warning the “economic equivalence” standard is vague and could be interpreted more restrictively by future regulators. They also point to limits on tying rewards to balances or transaction amounts, which could make incentives difficult to structure. “Overall, this is a more narrow and restrictive approach toward crypto,” they said. Another says the text is “largely in line with expectations” and reflects a balanced outcome, preserving transaction-based incentives while making clear stablecoins cannot function like interest-bearing deposit accounts. “This is the best possible result,” they said, noting that the text is broader than the initial Tillis-Alsobrooks proposal, which would have been more restrictive on crypto. Up next: Bank reps are set to review the text tomorrow.
122
Really highlights the difference in blind trust we're able to put into tradfi vs. defi still - hardcoded oracles - delay during an emergency caused by multisig ops - basic mint mechanisms
1/ Millions in bad debt, at the time of writing, were created across Gauntlet's Morpho vaults from the Resolv USR exploit. Almost all of it was supplied ** after ** the exploit. So why would curators supply millions in USDC to a broken market? Let’s dive in.
60
17 Oct 2025
This week has made me miss living in New York 😭 - Spontaneous karaoke nights - Overdosing on wine with the crypto girlies - Late night trauma sharing - All around gud vibes
2
2
186
15 Oct 2025
Popped into NYC for #theaptosexperience. Find me this weeeek @Aptos @poymeetsworld @BoysClubWorld
4
4
62
1,955
22 Aug 2025
Ty for inviting me to be part of the Economic Summit today 🫶🏻 Always incredible to see @asianhustlentwk in action
6
162
18 Aug 2025
bullish
🚨 Big milestone 🚨 $PLUME is now listed on @binance! 📅 Trading starts August 18, 2025 Pairs: USDT, USDC, BNB, FDUSD, TRY
6
32
1,341
12 Aug 2025
Can't ignore facts - @plumenetwork is in the big leagues now
Wow ATH for TPS yesterday! Also great to see @LineaBuild @AbstractChain, @unichain incoming!
19
11
105
4,502
Johanna retweeted
8 Aug 2025
We need to talk about the relationship between projects and communities. Everyone loves to hate on projects. But no one talks about how toxic the average web3 community has become. Let me be clear: most communities today aren’t communities. They’re entitlement farms. The relationship should be mutual. Projects support the community, and the community supports the project. But what we have instead is purely transactional. People don't want to build with you. They want to extract from you. They’re not looking to contribute. They’re waiting to be paid. The only thing that matters is: what's in it for me, right now. Projects get called out for over-farming their users. Fair. But no one wants to admit the real acceleration happening right now is the normalization of this mindset that users deserve something. Just for showing up. That word ** deserve ** has rotted everything. Hyperliquid didn’t ruin the game, but it set the bar way too high. They did everything right: no VCs, so full control of token economics. Clear product-market fit from day one, with real revenue. A well-designed token flywheel that actually worked. Top users made life-changing money. And overnight, that became the new benchmark. Every new project is now judged against it. No matter the differences, the expectations got anchored there. Since then, nothing has been the same. Now every project has to do an airdrop. Not because it fits the product, or the narrative, or the timing - but because if they don’t, they won’t get attention. And if there’s no hype, there’s no distribution. And if there’s no distribution, the project dies before it even starts. But the moment the word “airdrop” enters the chat, the bots arrive. The Discord fills with people who joined three weeks ago and posted four times. The community becomes a theater. Everyone is acting like a loyal supporter while secretly running a multi-wallet setup. It’s sick. You can’t build anything sustainable on this kind of foundation. Yes, distribution is king. But we’ve built a system where loyalty gets diluted, hype becomes a requirement, and anyone with genuine intent is forced to compete against airdrop mercenaries. Most of the people claiming to be part of your community are gone the moment someone else offers more. And when they leave, they don't just walk away quietly, they turn around and ask why you didn’t give them more on the way out. I’ve lived this. We gave people the biggest airdrop of their lives. For many of them, it was free money on a scale they’d never seen before. Still, it wasn’t enough. No matter how much they got, they believed they deserved more. This isn’t a community. It’s a traveling circus. You build a product, a narrative, a token model, something that takes months. They judge it based on three tweets. You build a bridge - they want a trampoline. And when it works, no one says thank you. When it’s delayed or misses the mark, they flip on you instantly. Projects aren’t allowed to make mistakes. Communities can do whatever they want. Look at Berachain. Where’s the ooga booga timeline now? Did anything actually change post-TGE? Where are all the PoL fans? Monad, you're next. Good luck. And before someone throws “but RedStone had a bad airdrop” at me - yes, we made mistakes. We ran a big APAC campaign late in the cycle, and we didn’t include it in the final TGE criteria. People were right to be confused. We paid the price. But what we got in return was way beyond reason. People threw mud, spread lies, sent threats. Even the ones who won turned around and asked why they didn’t win more. No grace. No memory. No loyalty. And yet I still believe we did a great job rewarding the most committed people. The ones who were really there got paid. Not enough, apparently. Was it worth it? I’m not sure. Because the hardest hits come from people you actually spent time with. When a random bot FUDs you, it’s noise. When someone you trusted turns on you.. it cuts deep. I don’t know if there’s a fix. Maybe time. Maybe the free money runs out and the extractors leave. Maybe only real users will stay. But I’m done chasing it. This is probably one of the last things I’ll write about community. I don’t have the heart for it anymore. I’ll focus on what I can control, product and distribution. And let the circus move on without me.
28
5
107
9,303
Friyay
5
135
Johanna retweeted
18 Jul 2025
The GENIUS Act just passed the House. And it’s a huge win for crypto and real-world assets (RWAs). Why does it matter? Clear rules. Stronger protections. A green light for RWA innovation in the U.S. The GENIUS Act doesn’t just bring stablecoins into the financial system, it lights the fuse for the entire RWA sector. Tokenized real estate, credit, and securities are next. We’re talking trillions in traditional assets moving onto blockchain rails. At Plume, we’re proud to be building the infrastructure to support this movement, making RWA markets more accessible, transparent, and productive. The need for secure, productive onchain assets is urgent and undeniable. RWAs = Plume 🪶
19
18
143
5,763
16 Jul 2025
Real World Ladies of Plume ✨ After braving the storms of mainnet and TGE together, it was a breath of fresh air to see the Plume fam IRL 🫶🏻
12
3
86
4,328
15 Jul 2025
Happy Crypto Week~ Between BTC hitting a new ATH and Plume spearheading onchain RWAs, it's wild to think about how I stumbled into crypto back in 2020 because of my time at Coinbase. What an insane journey so far
5
1
29
1,174
Johanna retweeted
The FDIC Finally Discovers Fire: A Crypto Awakening Three Years (or more) Too Late, by @sultanmeghji open.substack.com/pub/sultan…
2
6
1,472