You all fell for it.
So there was this whole engagement-bait driven argument last week (driven by one of the Internetās worst humans, citing questionable data), about how younger generations (who also happen to be less well-off financially) use expensive meal delivery services more often.
No, Iām not tagging the originator, or citing any of the awful (or even funny) posts on either side of the divide, because *that was the whole point*: to create engagement focused on divisiveness.
Today, I took a ribeye roast, and rendered into steaks, ribs (not pictured), and fat for tallow. This is a step in the meal prepper dream: buy food in bulk, driving down the price, and using all the parts.
This isnāt even, really, the argument about cooking your own food; because this is the step beyond. Iāll save the rib bones and make beef stock, which will later be the base for beef stew. Iāve got bags of chicken bones and veggie skins already in the freezer for the next wave of chicken stock.
Hereās where Sam Vimes Economics kicks in: it takes money to save money. I can do this because we have four freezer (three fridge-combos, one deep freeze). I always have the space to buy a large piece of meat, or buy the Costco size bag of something.
My kid, who just moved into his first apartment, would be happy to do deep food prep, even more than me. But itās a tiny apartment, with a kitchen slightly larger than a shoebox, with four bedrooms. When he was last visiting, he wouldnāt take back as much food as we wanted to send, *because he couldnāt store it*.
While Iām not going to defend using meal delivery services for all of someoneās meals, letās recognize that the depth of someoneās larder *is* inversely correlated with wealth.
If someone gets sick in our house, weāve got a weekās worth of chicken soup in the freezer ready to go. Younger urban folks? They may have to DoorDash a bowl of soup.
Letās just be charitable.