Current rule: Every post I see from an elected MP or political commentator against the "Brit card" gets a like and a repost. Whether your political views typically align with mine or not is irrelevant. We either stand against this together or not at all.

£5,778,570 from Buckinghamshire Council to one taxi firm in 2025, across 3,215 transactions. That's an average of £1,797.38 per transaction. And yet people are saying there is nothing wrong here.

10 June: Canada tables an under-16 social media ban age checks for everyone. Five days later, Starmer announces the same for Britain. Same policy. Same timing. Same “safety” language. Coincidence - or another piece of the global censorship agenda?

The UK government who didn’t protect Kids from rqpe gangs are now claiming they want to protect kids from Social Media. Think about that…

The British people are in the absurd position of having to defend their country from their own politicians.

Barnaby Philip John Webber 11/01/2004-13/06/2023 💔 If you can, share these images of the beautiful soul stolen from us by the worst of humanity. Let his face today burn bright. Barney, I promise you there will be accountability 💛💚 For You. For Grace. For Ian.

Don’t worry about Elon becoming rich with his own money. Worry about politicians becoming rich with your money.

This will forever be one of the most brutally articulate take downs. And all it is, is truth. Pure unadulterated truth. Incredible by @_ConnieShaw Take a couple minutes out your day to listen.

People have stopped demanding that the full Henry Nowak footage is released. Hampshire Police shouldn't be let off the hook.

Build a rocket company of your own before telling us whether trillionaires should exist.

Police admit releasing misinformation whilst warning the public not to spread any 'misinformation' . 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 #DARVO

A UK juror who publicly discusses their time on a jury, including votes, deliberations, what was said in the jury room, or internal discussions, risks prosecution for contempt of court under section 20D of the Juries Act 1974 (as amended). This is a criminal offence. Penalties include fines and/or imprisonment. Jurors are explicitly warned at the start of service that they must not disclose such information, even after the trial ends. The rule protects the integrity of the jury system and prevents post-trial appeals based on what jurors later claim happened behind closed doors. This person is on very thin legal ice.

> be Police in Scotland > declare you are institutionally racist > put entire force put through unconscious bias training and “lived experience” workshops > have 12 year old white girl claim a migrant made sexual comments & violently attacked her friends > side with the Bulgarian couple and say they were approached by youths because who’s more violent than a group of 12 year old white girls? > charge the 12 year old > announce “misinformation” because the word is bullshit > get ex-First Minister Yousaf, who hates Native whites with the fiery passion of a thousand suns, to mock the claim that migrants tried to sexually assault the girls, because when has such a thing happened in the UK! > be sad when the CCTV comes back to show the girls told the truth > be forced to quietly charge the man & his sister > watch both get convicted and look like the Stasi shitheads that you are

This was the statement released by Police Scotland after the footage of the incident in Dundee went viral last year. It seems that everything was done to give the impression that the young girl was the aggressor and the migrant couple the victims. A court decided yesterday that it was the other way round. Blatant disinformation. Police Scotland owe everyone an explanation.

This really worries me A month ago in Wales I suffered a ruptured aneurysm in my abdomen. I lost over 2 units of blood But the Welsh ambulance service refused to send an ambulance. I was still breathing so apparently didn't need one I spent 7 hours lying on the ground in a car park. Every time I moved I threw up from the pain. The owners of the car park called 999 6x One of the people there was a fireman. He couldn't believe that 999 treated each call as a separate incident and couldn't see the details or link to previous calls. He was frustrated because they could see I was seriously ill but you can't see internal bleeding and so there was no way to persuade 999 that it actually was an emergency Eventually my husband arrived by taxi, journey of more than 3 hours from our home He gave me my pain meds (the car park people were worried about liability and I was too ill to get them myself). This meant I was able to crawl into the car and he drove me to A&E He got me into a wheelchair. We waited 75 minutes to see a doctor. I was shivering, heaped with blankets and threw up all over the floor As soon as a doctor looked at me I was taken straight to resus. The next day I was transfered by blue light ambulance to another hospital, had a blood transfusion and spent 5 days on the high dependency unit If my husband hadn't been able to come and look after me I have no idea how I would have survived. As it was I nearly didn't I would not have been able to get myself to hospital nor would I have been able to log into some digital triage system This scheme seems to assume if you're seriously ill you'll arrive by ambulance and if not you're well enough to navigate a digital portal My experience suggests that's a dangerous assumption A week later, back home in England I had another ruptured aneurysm. This time an ambulance came in 2 hours and again I was taken straight to resus It wasn't the same because I had a recent diagnosis of a ruptured aneurysm so we could tell 999 I was almost certainly bleeding internally. But I was too ill to get myself down the stairs and out to the car. We still needed that ambulance and I still wouldn't have been able to fiddle around with an ipad Proper triage REQUIRES an actual doctor to look at the patient. It takes a matter of minutes to differentiate between a life threatening emergency and not a life threatening emergency. That's not minutes to get a diagnosis but to know that the person is stable or not stable and if not that needs immediate attention Seriously ill people can't do it themselves. It doesn't matter how smart or articulate they are normally. Or how tough. Expecting people to manage their own emergency care isn't what a modern health service should do telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06…

The man who wants to ban social media for spreading misinformation @Keir_Starmer has been community noted 27 times for lying.

The story in four parts

Zack, I'm not sure you get it. The dark place was the attempted beheading, thwarted by courageous bystanders. The darker place is politicians carrying on business as usual like there's no correlation or causation.

Here are headlines from the UK, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Simultaneously, they all want a social media ban. "To protect the children". Our governments aren't calling the shots; they're following orders. This is just one example. Every law passed happens in the exact same way in all for 4 countries. This cannot be possible unless each leader of each country works for the exact same people. Our leaders are not elected; they are installed. #UK #NewZealand #Canada #Austrailia

Does anyone seriously think that someone who spent his earlier career seeking to prosecute soldiers, and who wanted a Prevention of Military Intervention Act, was ever going to be serious on defence?

I am stunned to learn that a never-ending stream of anti-white identity politics has generated some very undesirable responses. This outcome was obviously impossible to predict.