Compounding knowledge

Joined May 2011
391 Photos and videos
DanielP retweeted
SpaceX hit $3 trillion market cap today. This means Elon Musk made more money in the last 24 hours than Warren Buffett made in his entire lifetime. Insane.
311
623
8,123
445,055
DanielP retweeted
OK THIS IS LITERALLY FREE MONEY THO
Community note
The match ended in a draw. espn.com/soccer/match/_…
2
1
10
9,683
DanielP retweeted
Alex Soros is interesting because he’s a billionaire heir who dedicates his life to making cities less safe. He’s like a Reverse Batman.
871
6,024
62,915
1,377,826
DanielP retweeted
RIP TO THE PEOPLE WHO BOUGHT $SPCE THINKING IT WAS $SPCX AT OPEN TODAY
130
71
1,823
202,410
DanielP retweeted
Mexicanos dançando e cantando GANGNAM STYLE com os coreanos no México após a vitória da Coreia do Sul na Copa do Mundo. 🇰🇷🇲🇽

558
11,452
122,405
6,043,138
DanielP retweeted
Nintendo took 40 years to give us a Legend of Zelda movie. I made this in 5 days on a $300 budget. It looks like a $300M blockbuster. Let me show you how I made this in 5 simple steps inside of Freepik: 🧵
4,658
2,213
20,675
9,992,443
DanielP retweeted
This is the UK
696
5,234
36,011
2,020,141
Teatro del bueno
Comunicado Oficial.
1
113
DanielP retweeted
Benny Hill explicando el Socialismo en 20 segundos.
124
5,462
17,105
616,295
DanielP retweeted
OPINION: If there were any real profit to be extracted from SpaceX, Anthropic or OpenAI at the offering valuations, do you honestly think they would allow the public RETAIL investors to have all that profit? Not on your life. Insiders would gobble up all the shares and reap all the profits for themselves. They aren't taking these companies public because they have angelic hearts and want to "spread the wealth" to the masses while reducing their own take-home wealth. They are taking them public because they need a new wave of bag holders so the insiders can cash out. If you're buying these IPOs at retail, you're the bag holder. You're the sucker. The insiders are done frontrunning the entire scheme and YOU are their exit cashout. The only real way to profit from IPOs these days is to be on the ISSUING side of the IPO, while talking up your bag so that the public masses line up to buy your overpriced shares.
122
285
1,430
41,884
DanielP retweeted
Por poner en contexto, el MCP de BQuant: 192 herramientas · 8 dominios · 20 años de histórico fiable: — 79.000 acciones globales (precios desde IPO, dividendos y splits, 86 ratios, valoración Lynch/Graham, técnico) — 53.900 fondos UCITS planes de pensiones España — SEC EDGAR completo desde 1993, vista dual (por declarante y por compañía) — Smart money: insiders, Congreso USA (STOCK Act), 13F de superinversores y activistas 13D — Earnings y analistas: transcripts completos, sorpresas EPS/revenue (35 años), ratings, precios objetivo y consenso — Macro y sectorial: 50 años con versionado point-in-time; régimen, recesión y rotación sectorial — FX: 33 divisas oficiales del BCE — Noticias con sentiment y extracción automática de tickers Lo diferencial no es cada fuente, sino cruzarlas en una sola pregunta. Si a algún institucional le interesa, DM's abiertos.
🔊¿Quieres conectar nuestro escaparate de fondos y carteras automatizadas con tu IA favorita? Te estamos esperando. 👇mcp.myinvestor.es/es
8
12
98
24,527
Cada vez más gente se da cuenta de los problemas de los indexados en cuanto a rentabilidad. Además, reducen la autoestima de sus clientes, y son un factor importante para aumentar la mediocridad de la sociedad. Acabarán pasando de moda (otra vez), aunque mientras tanto generan muy buenas oportunidades para los inversores en acciones.
2
135
DanielP retweeted
Billionaire CEO's burning $3k a second in fuel yacht racing after laying off 20% of the company to 'cut back on costs'

Community note
It's AI Slop you can see it at the end. The wave hits the Woman but she doesn't even flinch or gets wet reddit.com/r/RealOrAI/com…
975
5,558
30,781
3,793,586
DanielP retweeted
The crash was pretty incredible today. Using leverage is always bad. This was deleveraging. 100%. Never. Use. Leverage. Unless you can back it up!!!!
43
11
705
83,699
DanielP retweeted
Replying to @gmoneyNFT
Hyperliquid
1,031
1,268
8,189
1,921,929
DanielP retweeted
Whenever $GLD $SLV #Bitcoin and the broad markets all start tanking in unison, it generally signals more of a short-term plumbing issue for me in the financial markets.
12
8
197
33,570
DanielP retweeted
Bitcoin < USD 60,000! 👀❗️😱❗️🍿
The dynamic surrounding bitcoin commentary remains fascinating, if not outright ridiculous. Whenever the price of bitcoin declines sharply, the number of people proclaiming its death seems to rise exponentially. People have an undeniable urge to let the world know when they think they are right, especially on social media. The reality, however, is that most of these critics have been wrong repeatedly, and in many cases have been wrong for years. Naive, or perhaps outright foolish, arguments that bitcoin has no cash flows (a claim that has become increasingly debatable with the rise of bitcoin-backed lending), no intrinsic value (try looking at it from a network perspective), is too volatile (at least include returns and diversification benefits if you want an honest comparison), or is not used for transactions (read up on Gresham’s Law) suddenly receive much more attention whenever the price of bitcoin is falling. At the same time, bitcoin enthusiasts continue to fall back on equally shallow responses such as “you don’t understand bitcoin,” “study bitcoin,” or the classic “have fun staying poor.” Just as nocoiners seem unable to resist predicting bitcoin’s demise over and over again, bitcoin supporters often cannot resist responding to every criticism, no matter how poorly informed it may be. The truth is that bitcoin could still go to zero. What if people simply do not feel the need to own scarce assets in a world where money can be created at will? Gold remains one of the most underowned asset classes on the planet despite a track record spanning more than 5,000 years. What if investors continue to prefer AI stocks over storing value on a decentralized ledger that has existed for less than two decades? What if bitcoin’s technology is eventually surpassed, perhaps even by inferior alternatives, because governments do everything in their power to make that happen? Stablecoins come to mind. Many of the people calling for the end of bitcoin have little idea what they are talking about. Equally, many of those who view bitcoin as the ultimate scarce asset in a rapidly changing world have little idea what they are reacting to.
2
1
11
4,452
DanielP retweeted
Bitcoin $BTC has fallen to its 200-week moving average for the first time since 2023 📉 Historically, this has been a great buying opportunity 👀
174
415
2,861
260,493
DanielP retweeted
Wow, the S&P Dow Jones Indices has just officially announced that they will NOT be changing their inclusion rules to make it easier for “MegaCap” companies (such as @SpaceX) to be fast-tracked into the S&P 500. Their reasoning: "S&P DJI determined that exceptions to the financial viability, seasoning, and IWF requirements should not be granted solely based on market capitalization. The decision not to adopt the proposed exceptions preserves core index principles by maintaining consistent application of these key requirements. Although there may be trade-offs between strict adherence to these eligibility requirements and broad representativeness, the current methodology provides substantial market coverage and sector balance. As a result, the indices can continue to meet their stated objectives while preserving their role as representative and investable benchmarks for the U.S. equity market. No changes will be made to the eligibility criteria including financial viability screens, seasoning period, or minimum IWF, for the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400, or S&P SmallCap 600 as a result of the S&P Dow Jones Indices consultation on the treatment of MegaCap companies. Accordingly, there will be no changes to existing methodology for this index family." This means that the earliest @SpaceX could be eligible to be added to the S&P 500 would now be June 2027. The requirements that will now remain in place are: • No changes to S&P 500 eligibility rules for mega-cap companies. • Mega-cap companies will still need to wait 12 months after their IPO before being considered for S&P 500 inclusion. • S&P will not waive profitability requirements for mega-cap companies. The company must have positive GAAP net income in the most recent quarter, and the sum of the most recent four consecutive quarters. • S&P will not waive minimum public float requirements for mega-cap companies. At least 10% of a company's shares must be publicly tradable ("free float"). The S&P rejected proposals that would have: • Reduced the IPO seasoning period from 12 months to 6 months • Waived profitability requirements • Waived minimum public float requirements
377
932
6,704
843,076
DanielP retweeted
Do you guys not see what is clearly going to happen
NEW: Fidelity lowers the minimum account requirement for the SpaceX IPO from as high as $500,000 to just $2,000.
786
1,803
36,301
8,631,061