Someone recently called out the film fund pitch. And they're right - simply funding multiple movies rather than one at a time doesn't solve anything, it just funds more movies.
Funding movies is only 1/4 of the process.
Yes, you need a good, diversified model for investing in films, but you also need to cover the downside.
That means disciplined budgets and talented craftspeople making the best movie possible.
Then you need distribution to ensure it reaches the market in a meaningful way.
And you need the audience to know your movie exists, show up to see it, and tell all of their friends about it.
It's not just about portfolio math, it's about a better holistic model
When you have good processes in place - greenlight constraints, budget discipline, and distribution relationships - that creates not just profitability, but predictability.
That's the part the critics left out. It's not just a new funding model, it's an entire model for funding, producing, marketing, and distributing indie films.
Done right, every film grows leverage for the next one, and the outcomes get more and more predictable.
If you're curious about how we've set it up at Craftsman Films, shoot me a DM with your target check size and I'll tell you which structure typically fits better.