Considering all physical limitations of space travel it seems to me like the only way humanity might be able to colonize planets around other stars are automated ships managed with robotics, storing and preserving eggs, and hatching humans only after a habitat is established.

Looking forward to seeing what is achievable with real supply chains, battery and actuator manufacturing, raw metals supply, and the assembly itself… by comparison the cognitive function and intelligence of this army of machines seems almost trivial :)

What I am missing from this AI solution to an obvious problem of runaway bureaucracy is the lowering of bureaucracy… why not create an AI system AND significantly simplify the paperwork? Why is a solution to artificial complexity always more complexity?

This is the amount of paperwork required to admit a patient to a hospital in the United Kingdom! It’s basically a “paper patient twin.” For an experienced staff, it would take roughly ~90 minutes of documentation on paper. Or as part of traditional EHR workflows, around ~35–45 minutes and 600–800 clicks! Or about 15 minutes and 20-40 clicks using an AI scribe. Just my subjective estimations. That means AI could reduce documentation time by roughly 70% compared to paper, and reduce click burden by around 95% compared to conventional EHR systems. Significantly lowering cognitive load and fragmentation would be the added bonus. What are hospitals waiting for?

This artist plays one of Vivaldi's most difficult pieces on his accordion, a work that is normally performed by a whole orchestra.

I just published On sequence diagrams, value stream and flow engineering… medium.com/p/on-sequence-dia…

I just published Nobody has time… medium.com/p/nobody-has-time…

I just published - What are the two types of enterprise architecture documents? medium.com/p/what-are-the-tw…

I just published Making knowledge work visible medium.com/p/making-knowledg…

I just published 14 Rules of Testing medium.com/p/14-rules-of-tes…

Wrote a new article on Medium. Enjoy! medium.com/@kruczkowski.piot…

I just published 100% Utilization Trap medium.com/p/100-utilization…

One of the most uncomfortable feelings is to be a rebel without a cause, because then you are forced to look inside.

We should have 13 months instead of 12. If we had 13 months, every month would be 28 days a.k.a 4 weeks, it would always start on Monday and end on Sunday, all celebrations would be always a fixed date, we would align to the phases of the moon and kalendars would become obvious. The additional month would be called Sol, for the sun. If someone said 1st of June, you would always know they mean Monday, and if someone said 3rd Tuesday in February, you would always know its 22nd of February. No more irregularities. Every month the same length, every calendar the same structure. The benefits of a calendar system like this are immense. It is estimated it would save billions of $ on the effort of time calculations worldwide (and the mistakes from confused dates), but its not just that. It would reshape the culture. Some folks would say it is impossible to reshape how we do the calendar, but please realise we already use the 52 weeks system in professional settings - many account the time by saying "Week34" or "W45". This is just 13 month calendar which skips the Months.

We are safe ;)

RT @colin_fraser: Oh brother

Everyone is hyper-focused on the benefits of MCPs - and understandably, it's an amazing tech - but nobody talks about the issues to overcome: 0. LLM cost for verbose context with poorly designed MCPs. 1. You still need to handhold the LLMs using the MCPs because they make naive mistakes. 2. You have to explain to them domain specific language, otherwise they will obviously missunderstand. 3. You gotta handle security as if you were dealing with SQL injections on steroids, because not just bad actors, but simply users unfamiliar with coding will now be using automagical automations. Can you think of any more obvious limitations?

Chłopaki. Nie zabijajcie się. Proszę.

Everyone wants to heal until the medicine shows up in the form of discipline - Hippocrates

Yann LeCun said we wont reach AGI by scaling LLMs. I agree but I would like to add that LLMs which are not AGIs are opening up an interesting possibility, where we might not "need" AGI to achieve most of the benefits we would ever need e.g. robotics, autonomy etc. Maybe AGI is not even needed in the first place. This would mean the apocalyptic scenarios would never have a chance to manifest.