Joined February 2022
1 Photos and videos
Your LLM agent doesn't leak privacy in one moment. It leaks it across an entire trajectory. Each tool call, file read, and API transaction adds up. OCELOT treats PII exposure as a *budget* problem, not a single-output problem.
1
24
Builders shipping agentic systems (RAG pipelines, personal assistants, automated workflows) need this framing now. If you're only auditing individual LLM outputs for PII, you're missing the compounding exposure across tool calls. Budget-based thinking changes the design.
1
9
The hybrid tutoring model is interesting. AI generates at scale, humans refine at precision. But here's the tension: as AI lesson summaries and feedback get better, do tutors become quality-checkers instead of educators? The real win isn't replacing human expertise; it's freeing them to do what AI can't: build trust and adapt to why a student struggles, not just what they got wrong . @OpenAI #AIEducation #LLM #HumanAI openai.com/index/preply
4
🚨Three patched flaws in LangGraph, ncluding a critical RCE chain via SQL injection, are a wake-up call for every team running self-hosted AI agents. The framework layer is now a serious attack surface.
1
15
At the LLM API layer, AI Security Gateway (AISG) adds recursive loop protection real-time webhook alerts when agent behavior looks anomalous, catching runaway or compromised agent loops before they burn budget or exfiltrate data. It doesn't replace patching. It adds visibility.
1
22
DeepBuilt retweeted
$108 in an hour. One agent. 47 identical retries. Your framework's max_iterations setting didn't stop it. It only works if the agent knows it's looping. Most don't. Here's the failure mode: a LangChain agent hits a timeout. A CrewAI task fails silently. AutoGPT gets stuck in a reasoning loop. Each retry fires the same prompt to GPT-4 or Claude. Framework logs report "max retries: 5." Reality: 500 calls in 90 seconds. No alerts. No budget guardrails. Just a bill at the end of the month. We built gateway-level loop detection that works across all frameworks. SHA-256 fingerprint of each prompt. Sliding 60-second window. Fifth identical request triggers HTTP 429 - loop terminated, webhook fires to Slack. The proxy sees what individual frameworks can't: the full request stream across sessions and retries. Frameworks can't see the forest. A proxy can. The math makes the case: GPT-4 Turbo at $0.03/1K tokens, a 2K token prompt looping 500 times = $30. Per hour. Per agent. Most teams find out in their monthly bill, not in real time. We stop it after 5 requests. Before it gets expensive. → How recursive loop protection works: aisecuritygateway.ai/docs/re… #AIAgents #LLMSecurity #AgentSafety #AIGovernance #CostControl
2
2
105
Claude Fable 5 just dropped, and it's built for narrative-heavy tasks: generates coherent multi-turn stories, worldbuilding artifacts, and character-driven content at scale. If you're building creative AI apps or need reliable long-form generation, worth testing against your current stack. anthropic.com/news/claude-fa… #OpenSourceAI #LLM #GenAI
33
Adversarial context increases the rate of vulnerable AI-generated code by 10.7x, from 3.5% to 37.4%. That's not a theoretical projection. That's the output of 2,800 controlled experiments across four production code generation models. linkedin.com/pulse/ai-genera…
3
AI Security Gateway (AISG) implements semantic caching at the proxy layer. When a cleaned, redacted prompt matches a cached response, the request returns at near-zero latency. No tokens consumed, no provider call made and cost saved linkedin.com/pulse/how-seman…
19