Sci-Tech editor for @DefenseOne. Spies, AIs and the future(s). signal #eu/RniNNB5sfqCtvKrPXOJ7Bb8fdhS352E-RYdqeG2nGHTRmpJCuhFBnaKl91umQcRj">signal.me/#eu/RniNNB5sfqCtvK…

Joined March 2009
2,111 Photos and videos
I sat down yesterday w the smartest minds in military technology to discuss the new future(s) for AI. Videos and more coverage on-the-way. defenseone.com/?oref=d1-nav
98
I think I fell for Russian propaganda. Let me explain…
3
287
Patrick Tucker retweeted
France's domestic intelligence service is ending its contract with U.S. surveillance technology giant Palantir, it said this morning. politico.eu/article/french-s…
9
92
161
18,046
ChatGPT to debut on Pentagon's GenAI.mil in ‘early July’, OpenAI says defenseone.com/defense-syste… via @not_amazn_alexa @Frank_Konkel

1
274
Patrick Tucker retweeted
Big AI: Applying Cloud and Data at Scale. How is the Pentagon successfully integrating hyperscale analytics across the kill chain? Join us tomorrow at the Defense One Tech Summit to learn about the next wave of AI evolution from the cloud and frontier labs at the forefront. buff.ly/GUCutQR
2
2
3
1,350
Marines in the Pacific used 3D printers and other tools to field-produce shaped charges with local materials: plastic water bottles, crushed volcanic rock, coconut husks, and coffee grounds. A @Navybook dispatch from the @DefenseOne #Techsummit26
4
22
51
6,749
Patrick Tucker retweeted
Pro-Kremlin media jumps on U.S. intelligence chief’s revival of key Kremlin talking point: That the U.S. produces bioweapons in Ukraine. newsguardrealitycheck.com/p/…
2
3
3
641
Patrick Tucker retweeted
New: The Pentagon’s lead background-check agency is using AI to speed clearance reviews for people and companies seeking to do sensitive government work, marking a novel and notable AI-NatSec use case. w/ help from @Frank_Konkel nextgov.com/defense/2026/06/…
1
15
22
17,235
Patrick Tucker retweeted
How is @NATO evolving to meet the changing realities of conflict? During a recent discussion with @DefTechPat, NATO's Major General Dominique Luzeaux spoke about how the conflict in Ukraine is informing the organization's approach to procurement and standards development, starting with a focus on innovating faster than before, and faster than our adversaries.
2
1
896
Patrick Tucker retweeted
The French AI startup is set to deploy a team in Kyiv, with the backing of the French Defence mission there, to work with the Ukrainian Centre for Innovation and Development of Defence Technologies. ➡️ l.intelligenceonline.fr/z6k
4
63
165
8,126
Today is the day! See you at the 10th @DefenseOne Tech Summit. The future is a decision! events.defenseone.com/2026-d…
1
3
224
Patrick Tucker retweeted
All Wars are Robot Wars: Lessons from the Ukrainian Front. What are the critical takeaways from autonomous warfare in Ukraine for the future of combat? Join us tomorrow at the Defense One Tech Summit to discover how robotic warfare is changing centuries’ old concepts of warfighting. buff.ly/GUCutQR
1
4
7
1,260
Patrick Tucker retweeted
TOMORROW: Join us in Arlington, Va., for the Defense One Tech Summit. Hear about the future of defense innovation, big AI, small AI, lessons from the Ukrainian front, the Navy's autonomous future, special ops tech, Golden Dome, and more! See the full agenda and register: buff.ly/GUCutQR
2
4
1,180
.@grok in the discussion below, did you respond to the actual question I asked? If not, why not?
@grok statements from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence omit the “core facts.” What percentage of users on this site are engaging in this topic are also omitting them?
1
1
1
796
.@grok can you provide an explanation for why your responses to prompts in recent @ODNIgov disclosures about biological security support to Ukraine does not include this context?
Jun 14
**Prior to Feb 2022, similar Russian claims existed but were less specific.** In Oct 2018, Maj. Gen. Igor Kirillov (Russian Radiological, Chemical & Biological Defense Troops) stated the US was financing “renewed construction” of biological laboratories in Ukraine (and Azerbaijan/Uzbekistan) to build up “military-biological potential” under the guise of peaceful research. He also alleged US development of biological weapon delivery systems. Russian MFA statements (e.g., Maria Zakharova, April 2018) and state media raised parallel concerns about Pentagon-funded “microbiological laboratories” and pathogen-related activities near Russia’s borders, including in Ukraine and Georgia (Lugar Center focus). These fit a longer pattern documented in BWC meetings (e.g., 2015) and EUvsDisinfo reports from 2020–2021. The detailed post-invasion narrative (specific pathogen transport, “emergency clean-ups,” lists of agents like plague/anthrax) intensified after Feb 24, 2022. Pre-2022 claims were broader accusations of suspicious US-funded labs and pathogen work. **Context**: The US Biological Threat Reduction Program has supported Ukrainian public-health labs since 2005 to consolidate and secure Soviet-era pathogen collections for surveillance and biosafety — not weapons development. Ukraine owns/operates them. No credible evidence supports bioweapons claims; they have been consistently rejected by the US, Ukraine, UN, and independent analyses.
1
474
Patrick Tucker retweeted
Jun 14
**Prior to Feb 2022, similar Russian claims existed but were less specific.** In Oct 2018, Maj. Gen. Igor Kirillov (Russian Radiological, Chemical & Biological Defense Troops) stated the US was financing “renewed construction” of biological laboratories in Ukraine (and Azerbaijan/Uzbekistan) to build up “military-biological potential” under the guise of peaceful research. He also alleged US development of biological weapon delivery systems. Russian MFA statements (e.g., Maria Zakharova, April 2018) and state media raised parallel concerns about Pentagon-funded “microbiological laboratories” and pathogen-related activities near Russia’s borders, including in Ukraine and Georgia (Lugar Center focus). These fit a longer pattern documented in BWC meetings (e.g., 2015) and EUvsDisinfo reports from 2020–2021. The detailed post-invasion narrative (specific pathogen transport, “emergency clean-ups,” lists of agents like plague/anthrax) intensified after Feb 24, 2022. Pre-2022 claims were broader accusations of suspicious US-funded labs and pathogen work. **Context**: The US Biological Threat Reduction Program has supported Ukrainian public-health labs since 2005 to consolidate and secure Soviet-era pathogen collections for surveillance and biosafety — not weapons development. Ukraine owns/operates them. No credible evidence supports bioweapons claims; they have been consistently rejected by the US, Ukraine, UN, and independent analyses.
1
1,765
Patrick Tucker retweeted
THREAD | Russian propaganda is circulating a map claiming a new US intelligence document "confirms" American bioweapons labs in Ukraine. The document is real. What it actually says is close to the opposite of the claim. Let me walk through it.
38
286
914
71,012