this is subjective and just my personal take to be put out; i disagree with the notion that krakoa (the story’s) narrative nuance was not strong enough for me to suspend my disbelief over the questionable writing direction with multiple characters, to the point where-
One last thing about Krakoa: I've noticed that there are people who can't distinguish between Krakoa (the fictional nation) and Krakoa (the story). "I like Krakoa (the story)" is taken as some kind of endorsement of every one of (the fictional nation)'s foibles.