Financial markets always teeter on the precipice of collapse and volatility. But that is to be expected when you have a free market system that optimizes to maximize. Once a free market has maximized and stabilized at any given point of agreement (price) given the thousands of factors and variables that has led the market to settle on a given point, any removal or disturbance in the inputs will make it topple. That is expected. What is also to be expected is that things will settle out somewhere else. Stability will come eventually. What never happens is continual volatility or continual up or down. Once you understand this you will understand why BTC model (always going up) is DOA. And those who try to convince you otherwise (like MSTR) are just trying to sucker you in to keep the pump going on a bit longer so they can exit first.

Loremaster Self-hosted version update! Getting Voice and PDF upgrades to make it on par with the hosted version! patreon.com/loremastervtt/po…

HOT TAKE: what is wrong with this picture? If someone who is obviously male, tells you to that they pronouns are He/They -- he comes across as a pretentious douchebag. (and rightly so) If someone who is obviously female, tells you that zhey goes by zhey/her, you would think zhey are just virtue signalling. But if in either of the previous cases, if they male person had pink hair, or the female had a nose ring and black lipstick, it would be socially acceptable to give such pronouns specifications because they look queer "enough" to warrant them. What determines queer-enough? Must you look queer to choose your pronouns? If I choose my pronouns to me "Lord Master Zee", am I being cynical and callous or are you the listener just being insensitive of my gender rights?

First mathematical derivation of the fine-structure constant ever. Lfg! blog.floatingpragma.io/fine-…

Fundamental breakdown of political alignments: Far right: Ultra conservative individualists who believe that personal rights are earned and not necessarily granted. They believe the world is broken due to the leftists. Won’t change things on their own but if mobilized under a common cause will fight fanatically for it. Conservatives: Believe that the current political and economic systems are mostly working and therefore will be cautious and resist change unless very clearly justified. Believe and will defend individual rights over those of a hypothetical greater good. Look inward rather than outward. Liberals: Believe that the current economic and political systems are mostly broken and therefore push constantly for change choosing to error on the side of any change is better than no change and willing to accept that some changes may result in a regression of rights and personal liberties, betting on the fact that net of all changes overall will result in a net good. They see issue and problems with all systems currently in existence and seek to change them, except for the null hypothesis which is that the conservatives vs liberal dichotomy is a positive factor in avoiding dictatorship and authoritarianism. Far left: Same as liberal except that they do not accept the null hypothesis and will actively campaign to take down and neutralize the establishment, including conservative or dissenting voices, whether individually or as a mobilized group movement. They look outward and constantly believe it is their duty to change people and convert them to actively support their cause. Believe in the hypothetical greater good overriding individual rights as long as they can rationalize it to themselves. Socialists: Liberals who in addition believe that the good judgment of those put in power and the power vested in them are better trusted and override individual rights and liberties so long as the greater good is served. Believe that individuals should be forced to give up something so that the greater good can be served. Capitalists: Those who believe that capital itself (and its constructs such as companies) can rise to balance that of elected governments with the fundamental thesis that raising and growing capital is a costly signal of skill and competence to counterbalance the political system of the popularity contest Communists Believe fully in the wisdom of those elected or placed in power over those who are governed, so long as it can be conveyed in a way which can seen as for the greater good of the people. Capital itself has no power as state controls power. Only the populist political system controls power. In order to remove the power of capital strict controls over the economy and individual rights are required. Facists: Similar to communism with the only difference being they employ a form of crony capitalism and have a much larger focus on expansionism and nationalism. Individual rights fair better than in communism.

Verifying my developer account on BSV Radar. Code: BSV-MCAG #BSVRadar

Some key differences that make BSV original Satoshi’s bitcoin and why developers can build more on it. claude.ai/share/c2acd7ce-9f7…

Does the Christian catechism require loyalty to Benjamin Netanyahu? Apparently it does, as Carrie Prejean Boller learned the hard way. (0:00) Trump's Religious Liberty Commission (14:53) Who Is Paula White? (23:42) The Dark Phone Call Carrie Received (28:24) Are Christians Required to Support Benjamin Netanyahu? (30:01) What Is Replacement Theology? (32:13) Was Carrie’s Ousting in Preparation for the Iran War? (43:18) Carrie's Strange Meeting With Dan Patrick and Paula White (52:01) What Happened in the Hearing? (1:00:04) Is Anti-Zionism the Same as Anti-Semitism? (1:05:28) The Attacks on Carrie by Other Commissioners (1:13:22) Why You're Not Allowed to Talk About Gaza (1:17:12) Carrie's Feud With Seth Dillon (1:27:16) Why Aren't Carrie's Colleagues Defending Her? (1:38:56) Why Aren't Catholic Leaders Speaking Out?

Timestamp for C1-C17 BSV TxID: 22237444d063974621db32aec831c8c32d5e69576bcc1231ca5b208bf56b3427 (whatsonchain.com/tx/22237444…) Using the bagit format.

He was about to pop a vessel in his face.!!!

One of my FAVOURITE SPEECHES that SUMS up Canada

🔏 BSV Authorship Timestamp SHA-256: 93d89b4da40c2287a1bd0f68960a88bc cca033b44447fdd8926cc38eb1c25875 whatsonchain.com/tx/4f1f2bd1…

🔏 BSV Authorship Timestamp SHA-256: 1d41506b2495566de5be931c2ee6d238 fc7fc28f517e893794f964abef70daa1 whatsonchain.com/tx/06338741…

God bless America.

Proof of existence/Timestamped/Published Authorship attestation for patent-related code, anchored to BSV blockchain. SHA-256 manifest hash: 09b8331910dd278227870bde53882ee9e7e6efe67b0bf3a0caefa99f02d10417 TxID: 987576d7494e5e37357defad432e6a3fedb57f485e67f5ee8be71f80f1d09ecf whatsonchain.com/tx/987576d7…

bsv_sdk v1.0.0 for Elixir 🚀 First stable release of the Bitcoin SV SDK — a full-stack Elixir library for BSV. What's in the box: • Primitives — keys, scripts, transactions, BIP-32 HD keys, BIP-39 mnemonics • Contract DSL — define locking/unlocking scripts as pure Elixir pipelines • Built-in contracts — P2PKH, P2PK, P2MS, P2RPH (R-puzzle), OpReturn, Raw • OP_PUSH_TX — covenant support via PushTxHelpers • STAS/DSTAS token protocol support • SPV — Merkle paths, BEEF parsing/validation • Wallet — BRC-42/43 key derivation, BRC-77/78 message signing/encryption • Transport clients — ARC, JungleBus • Security audited — FORKID enforcement, timing-safe comparisons, ECDH hardening Includes ALL functionality in the BSV-ex package, which is no longer maintained by the maintainer. This should be your BSV SDK if you are an Elixir programmer. 📦 hex.pm/packages/bsv_sdk 📖 hexdocs.pm/bsv_sdk 🔗 github.com/Bittoku/bsv_sdk_e…