SCOOP: Federal Probe Finds 101 More UNRWA Staffers Are Hamas Soldiers From Oct. 7 -- "UNRWA school principals, teachers, security personnel, attendants, psychosocial counselors, and medical professionals" doubled as terrorists, @AidOversight concludes freebeacon.com/trump-adminis…

I bucked all advice from my friends (and resisted my conservative bias) and decided to fully trust the Times journalists. As they left my home they asked that I not talk to any other outlets and I insisted then and repeatedly over the following weeks that I would keep my word and only share this story with them. But then the weeks dragged on. They kept coming back to us saying the editors needed more. I needed to go on the record (okay). We need more screenshots (okay). I met every bench mark they set, eager to provide more sources or evidence as needed. After the story went up I began to ask them … wait, where are the stories from the other women? Where are their accusations of sexual assault? Why am I the focus? Why are there 11 paragraphs dedicated to detailing my work history (more than has been published about Graham’s by far)? Why does it say “nobody could corroborate” when I offered them sources that COULD corroborate? Why did they include an out of context quote from a friend joking “do not call Graham” after I called off my wedding? (Because she knew I would never). Where were the screenshots they’d said they would use? Or the mention that I’d supported local democrats and that most of my family (and husband) are liberal? The editors said it was too much, they explained. The Times also failed to include any mention that I DID confide in multiple friends through the years that Graham had been abusive — long before he was running for office. Those friends confirm they told the Times so. It dawned on me that this really was a set up all along. The journalists I trusted who convinced me to share a story I never wanted to tell methodically delayed and twisted this into a gift to the Platner campaign. Violating the trust of his victims. Shattering the trust I placed in them with the most vulnerable story of my life. And at the end of my call with them I reluctantly accepted their insistence that this was still a powerful story and that I had done a brave thing. And I thanked them for all the hard work they had put into it. Still fawning after all these years.

RT @ADL: Yesterday, on the one-year anniversary of the antisemitic firebombing attack in Boulder, the local SJP chapter chose to share a le…

IDF has ~170,000 active duty personnel. U.N. has ~131,000 staff. On an annual basis, that's about 1 assault for every 16,452 IDF soldiers, while at the U.N. it's 1 assault for every 173 staff. That is, using the U.N.'s own data, it is about 20x more rapey than the IDF.

Journalist: Did you see the evidence against Israel with your own eyes? UN: “No, that is not my job.” The rest is commentary.

Look what I found: Ramy Abdu — EuroMed chief and Nick Kristof's trusted source — speaking at a 2013 workshop organized by the "Hamas foreign ministry," where participants devised an "action plan" on "how to organize the work of Palestinian diaspora communities abroad."

It’s a miracle! Thank God, the flotilla anarchist made a full recovery in no time 🤣

Today, Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control designated nine Hizballah-aligned officials, including individuals embedded across Lebanon’s government seeking to influence key state decisions. Hizballah’s continued militant activity and coercive influence over the Lebanese state undermine the Lebanese government’s ability to assert its authority over state institutions and disarm the terrorist group.

Prioritizing empathy for those engaged in evil - this whole story perfectly (and unintentionally) illustrates the perverted mentality one can find in a wide swathe of the media industry today.

The Republic of Somaliland has chosen Jerusalem as the location for its Embassy in Israel.

This from the same journalist who got caught demonstrably lying about Iran's Holocaust denialism and refused to correct, notwithstanding @CAMERA4Truth presenting her network with the facts. blogs.timesofisrael.com/cnns…

Major (res.) Itamar Sapir, 27, was killed this morning in a Hezbollah terrorist attack launched from this church in southern Lebanon. Hezbollah once again turned a holy site into a terrorist stronghold - desecrating a place of worship, violating international law, and breaching the ceasefire. Major Sapir leaves behind his wife, Roi, and their one-year-old son, Maayan. Terrorists hide behind places of worship while targeting Israeli soldiers. The world must stop looking away.

The pro-terror flotilla attempting to reach Gaza is a ludicrous attempt to undermine President Trump’s successful progress toward lasting peace in the region. Treasury will continue to sever Hamas’ global financial support networks, no matter where in the world they are.

“It’s the Jews voting for Israel” #Eurovisión2026 Israeli @HarelKleiner checked statistically over 10 years and found only weak positive correlation (0.3) btw Jewish community size and vote for Israel. For 2026 he found a stronger positive correlation btw MUSLIM community size and high public score for Israel. Got to love statistics. 📊 📉 eurovision-vercel-site.verce…

My colleague @dmlitman tears apart Kristof's piece, which could only be explained as anti-Zionist pornography. camera.org/article/an-in-dep…

🚨KRISTOF OP-ED UPDATE: You can't make this up. CAMERA has learned that the @nytimes is responding to the widespread backlash it faced for publishing @nickkristof's "dog rape" op-ed by ... inviting concerned readers to a "dialogue." CAMERA has also learned that the Times has heavily edited at least one letter-to-the-editor submission, stripping out any mention of Kristof by name to turn it into a "genteel critique" of an anonymous article. We see exactly what the New York Times is trying to do here. This "dialogue" is a meaningless public relations stunt designed to make the paper look accountable while actively protecting a columnist who laundered unverified, outrageous claims. You cannot have a genteel, good-faith debate with a publication that platforms deranged blood libels.

The challenge in commenting on @SkyNews coverage of Israel is in finding words to adequately describe their descent into anti-Israel propaganda. Their attempt below to portray Jews as the aggressors in 1948, for instance, while erasing the invading Arab armies from the pages of history, is laughable. Are there any editors left at the outlet with an ounce of professional integrity?

This is what the @nytimes replied when asked to publish the full and official Israel Prison Service’s response to Nicholas Kristof’s lies. Of course, in their 18-page “article” they never saw fit to publish the full and official response.

To support his recent allegations in the @nytimes, @nickkristof references "studies" from the @UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) to suggest sexual violence is an Israeli "standard operating procedure." As @dmlitman explains in a new analysis, Kristof is simply pointing to a report that suffers from the exact same flaws as his own: a total lack of transparency and a demand that readers "just trust" an untrustworthy source. The reality of the COI is far more troubling than Kristof lets on, Litman writes: "It is a body established by the infamously biased and scandal-ridden Human Rights Council. It was led, at the time of the report, by three individuals with histories of egregious antisemitism and well-known hostility to the Jewish state. One commissioner, Miloon Kothari, claimed that Jews control social media. Another, Navi Pillay, is perhaps best known for cheerleading the infamous 2001 Durban Conference, where the most popular flyer distributed lamented Hitler’s failure to exterminate the Jews. The third, Chris Sidoti, responded to criticism of his fellow commissioners by accusing Jews of throwing accusations of antisemitism around 'like rice at a wedding.' He has also advanced the age-old dual loyalty trope by accusing Jewish nonprofits of being agents of the State of Israel. What little the COI has shared about its investigative process only raises alarm bells. For example, the 2025 report states that for its purposes, 'verification for sexual violence may rely on a single primary source if deemed credible.' What makes a source credible? Pillay, Kothari, and Sidoti say so. As CAMERA has pointed out previously, the COI’s terms of reference provide that corroborating a primary source requires as little as 'the investigator’s own findings.' This is particularly troubling given that they are notorious for regularly making demonstrably false claims in their reports."

NEW: @dmlitman's 3,000-word analysis of @nickkristof's "dog rape" column in the @nytimes painstakingly combs through the op-ed's claims and finds them severely wanting. Litman puts into perspective how, even assuming all 14 cases cited by Kristof are real, the assertion that raping Palestinians is "a matter of policy" is totally unsupported. And that's just a starting point. The deeper Litman goes, the more Kristof's narrative unravels ...