Again, a Georgia a case with hallucinations in a proposed order entered by a judge. Unsurprisingly, cites to State v. Payne.
(Seems like a good sign for Hannah that the CoA interpreted her case as remanded for _reconsideration_, rather than just correction of the order?)
Does Georgia have case law on judges' exercise of independent judgment in their opinions? I would think hallucinations carried over from a proposed order create a strong presumption that independent judgment was not exercised.
More AI misuse, this time by a lawyer and a court.
This is another situation where a lawyer drafted an order for a trial court that included fake, AI-generated cases, and the trial court entered the order without catching the hallucinations.
Court of appeal: "We find it troubling that counsel submitted such an order to the trial court, and regrettable that the trial court failed to identify any of these errors."
"Accordingly, we must, yet again, remind counsel, and lower courts, of their professional responsibilities...."