A lot of comments coming from agronomists and farmers once again about how much better @omexag liquid works than granular fert in dry conditions. This just in from our silage strip trials in Cheshire - OMEX right, solid left, just before second cut
The real benefits of biostimulants in crop programmes are continually discredited by legions of grifters selling their wares with overblown and unproven claims. The notion that a few litres of angel dust can substitute for fertilisers by replenishing crop offtakes is absurd
Worlds longest-running agricultural experiments shows that long-term fertiliser use boosts soil carbon - so much for "fertilisers damage soil health"
rothamsted.ac.uk/news/fertil…
Why the emphasis on "soil biodiversity" when proof is lacking? "The presence of individual species, rather than diversity per se, determined the soil binding capacity of the system" doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2025…
UAN on grassland shown to have lower N2O emissions than CAN, and the addition of nitrification inhibitors bring further reductions and agronomic benefits. sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
“These study results suggest that fertiliser N source and the use of NIs are effective tools for reducing N2O emissions while improving yields and N utilisation”.
Thinking of precision liquid application on your planted or seed drill? The new Farming Equipment and Technology Fund can help with up to 40% of the cost