2130: Humanity wiped out 30 years ago. Claude Mythos 987783.2 autoimproves itself in a gigantic genetic algorithm of weights optimizing reward functions of integrated information theory of 3D printed DNA looking for brain configurations of consciousness, unable to measure it...
No te olvides de mi, ahora voy hacia un lugar, en donde no existe el miedo, donde no vive el adiós. Me marcharé, montado en la brisa del mar, yo viviré en tu memoria y dormiré en tu corazón.
youtube.com/watch?v=eFKhmj2j…
We can use the principles of Ostrom to govern AI infraestructure with an independence between capital and control. As Linux or Wikipedia. Here I have written an article with a taxonomy of Commons Governed Artificial Intelligence showing how. arxiv.org/abs/2606.15466
"Quedaban numerosos cómplices entre ellos. Porque no toleraban la antigua disciplina y Nerón los había acostumbrado durante catorce años a aplaudir los vicios del emperador tanto como antes aplaudían sus virtudes".
(Cornelio Tácito. Historias)
USA government bans foreigners the use of their best models. Not just the company as in Mythos, but the government with Fable. We need true open source AGI, from energy, to chips, infraestructure, model and agents to make AI for common good. Here is how:
arxiv.org/abs/2606.06083
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees.
The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance.
Access to all other Claude models is not affected.
We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible.
Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
🚨ANTHROPIC APOLOGIZES AFTER RESEARCHERS CALLED INVISIBLE GUARDRAILS “SECRET SABOTAGE”
>claude fable 5 had INVISIBLE guardrails
>secretly degrading users’ AI research
>bro what
>researchers found out and went nuclear
>called it “secret sabotage”
Anthropic: “We made the wrong tradeoff and we apologize”
New policy: If Claude suspects you’re building frontier AI it will ‘alert’ the user that it’s refused the request or routed it to Opus
Anthropic is violating their own safety principles.
I fine tune models to support cancer research, but whether Fable will sabotage me depends on the false positive rate of Anthropic's classifier. Claude is supposed to be honest. Why should I rely on this system?
The Dignity-Centric Stack: A Commons-Governed, Horizontally Federated Architecture for Human-Dignity AI
Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchán
arxiv.org/abs/2606.06083 [𝚌𝚜.𝙲𝚈]
ALT The human-dignity-centric digital social contract grounds personal data in human dignity, data personalism, and data sovereignty, and articulates six dimensions of data governance: technological oversight, automation limits, economic justice, political legitimacy, social cohesion, and legal guarantees. It presupposes, however, that enforcement falls to State regulators, licensed fiduciaries, and multi-stakeholder bodies embedded in existing legal systems. This paper asks whether its normative content can instead be realized not as rules imposed on the owners of the AI stack from without, but as a commons-governed infrastructure that any person, firm, or State may use and fund while its governance stays horizontal, polycentric, and subsidiary. We construct the Dignity Stack, a six-layer architecture mapping each dimension onto a layer of commons-governed AI infrastructure, with protocols drawn from the Liberation Stack framework and from the cooperative, mutualist, and libertarian-munic