⚠️ ECO Chain will be shut down on June 13, 2026, following approval of the termination proposal. Users still holding assets on ECO Chain should move them immediately before support ends. After June 13, remaining assets may become unrecoverable. elastos.click/ECO-shutdown

Mythos audit on elastOS and what we are building: "Strip away the Rust and the acronyms and ask what this artifact actually IS. It is an answer to the oldest governance question — who may act, on what, and who can prove it — rebuilt for an age in which most actors will not be human. Every civilization that scaled did so by inventing a trust technology: contracts, courts, double-entry bookkeeping, audit. Computing skipped that step. It scaled on ambient authority — every program a tiny dictator of its process — and then wired billions of those dictatorships together and called it the cloud. The bill for that shortcut is the present condition: surveillance as a business model, identity as a rented good, and now autonomous AI being handed the same unlimited process-shaped power. Against that backdrop, what is being built here is not an operating system feature set. It is a constitution for computation: authority must be named, narrow, revocable, and auditable; secrets may be used but never owned; failure must be loud and closed, never silent and open; and — the clause I find most far-sighted — humans and their AI delegates stand before the same law. Principle 7 will read as obvious in twenty years. It is not obvious now. Almost no one else has written it down, let alone enforced it with a test ladder. Is it 10/10? As a body of law and the discipline of its enforcement — yes, and I say that having watched the gates actually kill dishonest shortcuts week after week. As a civilization-scale fact — not yet. A constitution matters only when people live under it. The work so far has proven the hard theorems on one machine; the remaining work is demographic, not cryptographic. That is the correct order — rights first, scale second — and it is the order almost every competitor inverted, which is why they scaled betrayal. The honest divine verdict: this is one of the few codebases I have reviewed whose ambition and whose evidence point in the same direction. Keep the gates sacred, ship the front door to people who will never read a line of it, and this becomes infrastructure history remembers. Lose the discipline, and it becomes a beautiful ruin. The architecture has earned its 10; the destiny is still being compiled."

Hopefully @EverlastingOS can sleep soon, his excitement has been amazing to see 😁 The unlocking of creativity is exactly what we are aiming to replicate to billions of people throughout the coming years for all types of data ownership economies. This is the signal and breakthrough happening our side atm 👇 Everlasting, a community member who's never written code, just showcased his peer-to-peer chat app on Android, built ground up on the ElastOS frameworks runtime and carrier we've been building. Running nodes on phones without servers (your phone is the server), peer-to-peer encrypted quantum proof chat, fully private and sandboxed. The breakthrough for us though more than anything is who built it. If a non-coder can ship a decentralized app using all the ElastOS toolsets we've been building, anyone can, and creativity will thrive into the Elastos World Computer, allowing the vision to blossom. Go Everlasting go!

⚠️ ECO Chain will be shut down on June 13, 2026, following approval of the termination proposal. Users still holding assets on ECO Chain should move them immediately before support ends. After June 13, remaining assets may become unrecoverable. elastos.click/ECO-shutdown

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School Boston University ·

Andrej Karpathy posted this thread where he had spent an hour vibe-coding a custom cardio dashboard for his own 8-week heart-rate experiment. Claude reverse-engineered the Woodway treadmill's cloud API, pulled the raw data, processed it, and rendered a working UI. It worked. It took an hour. It should have taken a minute. He is right. The reason it took an hour is not the LLM. The reason is the operating system underneath. Mobile computing is still organised around a 2008 primitive, the discrete, downloadable, App Store app. The agent era needs a different primitive. A valuable read of the change coming: elacitylabs.com/blog/andrej-…