Put very nicely by
@dannyryan:
Institutions care about counterparty risk, they care about in a transaction or particular market who can screw them over
This is why encrypting Ethereum's mempool is non-negotiable - toxic MEV & real-time censorship must end
x.com/Etherealize_io/status/…
Danny Ryan on why Wall Street cares about Ethereum's decentralization
Etherealize co-founder and a key architect behind Ethereum’s transition to proof-of-stake is asked if Wall Street institutions care about “decentralization.”
“That’s not the right word,” Danny replies. “They care about counterparty risk.”
He explains:
“They care about — in a transaction or a particular market — who can screw me over? And if the infrastructure is decentralized, nobody can turn it off, and their transactions will execute as intended . . . [that’s an] elimination of counterparty risk. That’s the operative lens of how they view the world, and if you explain how these systems work to them — and the difference between Ethereum and alternatives — they’re like, ‘Oh yeah, we do love decentralization because we have risk models and this helps us on our risk model.’”
Danny jokes:
“I’ve been looking for a customer of decentralization other than the cypherpunks I hung out with for the past 8 years, and I found it on Wall Street.”
As long as you speak the right language and frame it the right way, Ethereum’s decentralization is deeply important to Wall Street institutions.