first impression of claude 4.8 is it's extremely convincing but still a slopus. tried it to criticize a new project and it identified it fell into a local minima and invented a new parser for when we could've used ast. almost convinced me, glad i checked myself that ast is not emitted in older versions of the compiler we are targeting. codex chose a gnarly but ultimately justified approach. claude didn't bother to verify any of its claims and has used absolutist language like "delete analysis.py", which is basically 80% of the codebase. when presented with evidence: > That contradicts my earlier byte-count check, and it matters enormously > My earlier "v0.2.9" was a double false-positive (a git log -S hit on an internal symbol, plus a verification grep that mis-read a VersionException as success). Corrected in the review with a note owning the error the biggest bullshitter model in the world! if you rely on claude for anything, god help you.

everyone wants more tps. nobody asks if the chain is even private. congrats, you built the fastest way to broadcast your whole financial life to strangers. respect.

How to go broke in just a few prompts

Introducing the new @stitchbygoogle, Google’s vibe design platform that transforms natural language into high-fidelity designs in one seamless flow. 🎨Create with a smarter design agent: Describe a new business concept or app vision and see it take shape on an AI-native canvas. ⚡️ Iterate quickly: Stitch screens together into interactive prototypes and manage your brand with a portable design system. 🎤 Collaborate with voice: Use hands-free voice interactions to update layouts and explore new variations in real-time. Try it now (Age 18 only. Currently available in English and in countries where Gemini is supported.) → stitch.withgoogle.com