Company: Chris-we can’t find any qualified designers. Please help
Me: here’s an awesome person
*intros*
Me to designer: How’s interviewing?
Designer: Took 6 weeks to call, interviewed 2x, then ghosted
Me to co: *Youre’re* the problem.
👏 redesign 👏 your 👏 hiring 👏 process 👏
As a typical cynic when I see ✌️most influential✌️lists of anything related to my profession, I got a chuckle and a 🙄after seeing this for the Most Influential UX Professional on LinkedIn this week
Folks hired in last 2 years (& interns) may have never been in your (or any) office. If you see behaviors you think need adjusting, keep in mind:
* your org is likely touting “bring your whole self” to work
* don’t use squishy feedback like “how they show up”; say what you mean
2016: “hot take: designers don’t need portfolios”
2017: no one
2018: no one
2019: no one
2020: sure as hell no one
2021: no one
2022: “oh hey, designers don’t portfolios”
Can’t wait to be back in Minneapolis next month for @ConfabEvents. I’ve loved seeing this conf continue to lead the industry for over 10 years since my first visit in 2011, to now this year to see a colleague present, bring a team, and actually help sponsor.
More 🍰 💕 less 🌪
Clearly the product manager who thought it was a great idea to notify everyone on a text thread that one random donk laughed or thumbs upped a comment has never been on a group chat with a kid sports team’s parents
Totally understand why Slack doesn't have a mute-user feature, but maybe there could be one for free plans used by community groups after one person *checks history* posts every. single. day.
It stuns me that today some people legitimately think there is a conflict between design practitioners and people who sell workshops to call it, with a straight face, a UX Civil War. And oh hail no I’m not linking the evidence
Today on an introductory call w/ awesome candidate:
Them: “I think I know some of your coworkers”
Me: “Awesome! I know….your …uhh…older brother?”
Them: “oh yeah, that’s my dad”
That’s a first.
Using sportsball references all the time usually isn’t an inclusive approach to clear communication, but using sportsball references and then “apologizing to the ladies” for doing so is for damn sure sexist and assumes only doods know the sports.
I’ve seen a risk of conflating design deliverables and artifacts to job titles and seniority, where only some senior folks should make these things and those folks make those things.
When distinguishing levels, roles or what makes someone senior or not, look at scope, altitude, and expected and realized impact and outcomes, and who these roles partner with instead of saying “only senior folks make those”.
It’s an easy trap to fall into because it’s simpler to segment deliverables by role, but you risk unintended downstream consequences in doing so.
Role clarity ain’t easy, but anchoring it on activity won’t get you there.