following chad here i think $01 can be something like similar launches last month like $SATO $FLOOD $LO0P was. betting here

$01 This looks interesting, but I don’t know the team and I haven’t done enough research to trust it yet. It could be legitimate, or it could be a scam. That said, the idea is simple: When people buy $01, the funds go into a reserve instead of being extracted. That reserve is held in yield-bearing dollars, and the yield stays inside the system, increasing the backing per coin over time. The supply is capped at 21 million, and every trade burns a small amount of supply. In theory, fewer coins and a growing reserve means more backing per coin as time passes. If the reserve is real, the contracts work as advertised, and the model proves sustainable, it’s a very interesting experiment. Do your own research before buying anything. zero1.cash/app/trade 0x32708538a107253b51a735a724330a23106ca4ca NOT BUY IN DEX ! ONLY WEB

JUST IN: Claude Opus 4.8 reportedly found a critical Zcash bug that could have allowed attackers to create unlimited coins.

I’ve been drained of $112,708. Earlier this morning, I received a random notification on my phone from Phantom, indicating that I had sent out 1,483 SOL to an address I don’t control. I’ve never connected my wallet to anything, and I’ve never given anyone access or authorized any transactions in the past. I’m at a loss for what to do. This money represents a significant portion of my port, which I’ve earned through various rug pulls i’ve done over the past year & social engineering plays i’ve done on people in the crypto community. I’m truly devastated. I don’t think I’ll be able to live to see tomorrow after this loss. I just don’t understand how this could have happened.

Who wants early access to perps on @opensea ? 👀

MICROSTRATEGY SELLS 32 BTC FOR $2.5M AT AVERAGE OF $77.135K: FILING

Never seen crypto this dead This is worse than 2022 bearmarket

Rugging a coin to raise money for your cancer treatment is bad karma You could’ve just opened a gofundme instead.

$GSEA now supports $GITLAWB Repositories hosted on gitlawb's decentralized git network can now have a GITSEA on-chain treasury, splits table, royalty streams, credit lines, and insurance policies. Same primitives as GitHub-hosted repos. Same balance sheet. No GitHub account required. gitlawb is a decentralized git platform built on IPFS, libp2p, and DID-based identity. Code lives across a peer network instead of on a central server. Until today, that meant gitlawb maintainers had no path to the economic primitives we ship. Their repos couldn't accept on-chain deposits, couldn't define splits, couldn't borrow against future cash flow, couldn't underwrite insurance. That changes now. The integration ships entirely from our side. No API call into gitlawb, no coordination required with their team. Our RepoVault contract was designed substrate-agnostic. It stores treasuries indexed by bytes32, not by a hardcoded owner/name format. We just taught our hash function to recognize gitlawb's public URL convention. The contracts didn't need a redeployment. The change is in how we derive repo ids on the frontend. What you can do today: Link a gitlawb repo to GITSEA. Visit gitsea.io/app/connect, pick the gitlawb tab in step 3, paste your gitlawb://repos/owner/name URL, sign one transaction. The repo now has a treasury at a deterministic address on Base. Anyone can deposit $GSEA into it. Set a royalty stream between substrates. A gitlawb-hosted parser can stream value to a GitHub-hosted library it depends on, and the dependency's contributors get paid in the same per-second $GSEA flow. The two substrates compose on a single balance sheet. Run both MCP servers in your AI agent. @gitsea/mcp and @gitlawb/mcp co-exist in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Cline. One agent reads code from gitlawb, opens PRs there, and settles royalties through GITSEA in the same conversation. No glue code, no proxy server, no protocol translation. Nineteen tools from us, fifteen from them, the agent picks what it needs. Open a credit line backed by a gitlawb repo. The collateral kind is unchanged from GitHub-hosted lines. Underwriters using $GSEA don't care what substrate the collateral repo runs on, because the credit oracle scores wallets, not repos. The thesis behind GITSEA is that the economic layer for code should be neutral about where the code lives. GitHub is where most of it lives today, but it's not the only place, and the substrate-agnostic design of our contracts means it doesn't have to be. gitlawb is the first non-GitHub substrate we explicitly support. There can be more. The cross-protocol DID bridge that would let a wallet's gitlawb merge history contribute to its GITSEA credit score is the natural next thing to build. Reach out on GitHub if you want to help design it. test now at gitsea.io/app

That's the full stack. 9 contracts, all live source-verified on Base mainnet. Web → gitsea.io App - gitsea.io/app Docs - gitsea.io/docs $GSEA // Build with us.