Everyone is racing to build smarter AI.
I'm more interested in AI that knows when it's wrong.
A model that gets 95% right sounds impressive.
Until you realize the other 5% can quietly destroy trust.
The next frontier isn't intelligence.
It's calibrated uncertainty.
The most valuable skill in software used to be coding.
Then it became product thinking.
With AI agents, it might become delegation.
Because the bottleneck is no longer:
"Can we build this?"
It's becoming:
"Can we clearly define what success looks like?"
Bad instructions create bad employees.
Bad goals create bad agents.
I think people are underestimating what AI agents will kill.
Not jobs.
Interfaces.
Why open 12 tabs, fill 7 forms, and click 30 buttons...
when an agent can do it for you?
The biggest losers of the agent era may not be workers.
They may be software designed for humans.
Context window makin besar.
Tapi agent tetap bisa lupa kenapa dia melakukan sesuatu.
OMNI bukan mencoba memberi agent lebih banyak memori.
OMNI mencoba menjaga agar informasi yang paling penting tetap berada di working memory.
github.com/fajarhide/omni
Developers!
Z AI just dropped GLM-5.2 Max and it's free to try until June 19. They also shipped ZCode, inspired by Codex 😉.
Go ahead and try it now!
zcode.z.ai/en#zai#agentAI
Dulu bottleneck software development itu coding.
Sekarang?
Kadang malah mikir requirement-nya lebih lama daripada bikin fiturnya. 😅
AI bisa generate ribuan baris kode dalam beberapa menit.
Tapi AI masih gak tau soal..
- problem mana yang penting
- trade-off mana yang harus dipilih
- hasilnya udah cukup bagus atau belum
Jadi makin ke sini saya ngerasa coding bukan lagi skill yang paling langka.
Yang makin langka justru judgment.
Something clicked for me recently.
When coding manually, I review every line.
When using AI agents, I review outcomes.
That's a completely different job.
Less:
"How should I implement this?"
More:
"Did we solve the right problem?"
The bottleneck keeps moving up the stack.
Bayangin 100 org dikasih tools yg sama.
Claude.
Codex.
Cursor.
Bahkan token unlimited.
Kira-kira hasilnya sama?
Enggak.
Ada yg bikin bisnis.
Ada yg bikin side project.
Ada yg bikin fitur yg gak ada yg pake.
Disitu gw sadar.
Masalahnya bukan siapa yg bisa build.
Tapi siapa yg tau apa yg worth dibuild.
Karena di dunia dimana semua org bisa ngoding,
judgment jadi skill paling langka.
A few years ago, being technical was a huge founder advantage.
You could build what others could only imagine.
Today?
A solo founder with Claude/Codex can build in a weekend what used to take a team months.
Which raises an uncomfortable question:
If everyone has access to the same AI engineers...
What actually makes you a founder?
Maybe it was never coding.
Maybe it was judgment all along.
If Claude/Codex writes everyone's code,
the bottleneck shifts.
From:
"Can you build it?"
To:
"Should you build it?"
That's where founders are made.
Not in code generation.
In judgment, taste, and direction.
The new startup ecosystem isn't in Silicon Valley.
It's in random comment sections.
Looking to connect with:
→ Founders building
→ AI builders
→ Vibe coders
→ UI/UX designers
→ Anyone shipping faster than they were 6 months ago
If you're building something with AI, drop it below.
Curious what everyone is creating 👇
Long-context isn't the same as good memory.
An AI agent can still "know" the goal, previous decisions, and resolved bugs, yet perform worse because signal gets buried under logs, tool output, and reasoning traces.
Working memory > context size.
@karpathy@bcherny@AndrewYNg