Cybernetician, building liberty, love and understanding (for Computing see @ngnghm, for Cryptocurrency see @phanaero)

Joined May 2007
134 Photos and videos
François-René Rideau retweeted
Thanks to socialism, the average Zimbabwean became a trillionaire before @elonmusk 💪
388
3,514
21,434
364,859
William Spaniel @gametheory101 teaches little appreciate truths about how bluffing and bargaining failures between States are based on mutual ignorance of each other's private information. Even less appreciated: the same happens between States (so called) and "their" "citizens".
1
106
Politicians, bureaucrats, lobbyists, welfare queens, cops and outright embezzlers are also in eternal cold (at times hot) Anarchic warfare with each other at stealing bigger piles of the loot pile for themselves. Behind "democracy" and other "ideologies" to fool sheeple—Anarchy.
1
82
Sheeple eagerly consume soma from their schools and mass media, reassured to live in an illusion of stability... until the illusion becomes untenable due to the ever increasing abuse. Then—violence, revolution, civil and uncivil war—till they fall prey to the next illusionists.
25
There have been many trillionaires in past history: Mughal Emperors, Stalin... mass murderers who captured the vast wealth of entire nations through genocide. They personally exercised life and death control on any and every conquered inhabitant and all their possessions.
1
5
268
Elon Musk is the first trillionaire to achieve such colossal wealth by creating it instead of stealing it. He tremendously contributed to the world through innovations like cheap satellite launch and Internet in the remotest places on Earth (except where blocked by governments).
1
5
121
Communism and Islam are ideologies of mass murder. They reward the worst people on Earth with slaves and power—under the praise of swine. Capitalism is the ideology of creation. It rewards the best people on Earth with the ability to create even more—while the same swine cringe.
1
1
94
François-René Rideau retweeted
The message of a protest is "we don't like this". The message of a riot is "we don't like this, and we're able to do something about it". People who unconditionally call for peace and calm, regardless of the provocation, don't fundamentally understand how politics works in the real world. They do understand that the purpose of politics is to provide an alternative to violence, but that's as far as their understanding goes. They don't think through the implications, usually because they are quite comfortable with things as they are. If politics is an alternative to violence, then politics is a proxy for violence. And that means you have to dole out power in proportion to capacity for violence. Or someone's going to figure out they can do better by flipping the table. Monarchy wasn't replaced by democracy because of fine-sounding philosophical ideals and eloquent documents declaring this or that. Democracy happened because if you added rifling to the flintlock firearm, suddenly a individual farmer with a tube was the pinnacle of military technology, and now you had to keep all the farmers with tubes happy by giving them political power. (Ancient Greek democracy had a similar relationship with the hoplite warrior.) When political systems work well, for a while, the violence they represent becomes further and further from people's minds, and those who can't effectively commit or direct violence worm their way into power, and begin to take it away from those who can. And they'll defend their position by saying that violence is unthinkable, barbaric, always bad, must be disavowed at all costs, etc. This isn't some sort of high-minded principle on their part. It simply means one of two things. Either "the status quo works for me, so I don't want you to upset it", or "I suck at violence, and I don't want to have to fight". They want young men demoralized, so that their artificial meritocracy of spreadsheets, or their non-meritocracy of patronage networks, can be protected from the natural meritocracy of conflict. This means that riots aren't actually for achieving any specific material aim. They are for reminding the comfortable that judges and bureaucrats and policemen have home addresses and families. And that violence is always on the table. A protest would only send the message that the Irish don't want to be ethnically cleansed. But the bureaucrats and judges and lawyers already know that. They just don't care. A riot reminds them that they have to care, because the Irish have a long tradition of doing something about it.
The rioters have set a house on fire in Belfast.
185
1,144
6,826
221,684
Expulsion is not a valid concept, ever. You don't expel friends. You don't expel enemies. You sometimes grant people a 24h grace period to go away.
25
A foreigner, I am the embodiment of taxation without representation—the living proof that the US regime is founded on lies all the way down.
27
François-René Rideau retweeted
Once more with feeling: The West Wing is to politics was pornography is to sex—a complete fantasy that leads to unrealistic expectations and real world disappointment.
The thing about watching the West Wing today isn’t that it’s aged poorly (it hasn’t). It’s that it takes you back to a time when many still believed that public service could be a noble calling. An entire generation has now grown up without that feeling.
107
348
3,421
796,675
François-René Rideau retweeted
57
392
4,950
507,853

“The Morning Visitor” is a highly controversial 1967 painting depicting what the artist Dino Buzzati called “the inevitable consequence and pain of unchecked third-world immigration.”
1
107
Left-wing outrage is not real. It is your own generosity being weaponized against you. Nothing short of diabolical.
1
56
François-René Rideau retweeted
Yes.
17
203
2,114
34,263
François-René Rideau retweeted
French man arrives in Texas and gets the French beat out of him YEEHAW PARTNER
176
1,096
8,410
224,371
Communism is the official religion of Europe, with Islamism its now close challenger. Communism will take you back to the stone age, Islamism only to the iron age—a clear winner.
1
60
When I fire someone and they actually ask to see me I always explain exactly why. Never lie. And if they try to argue I just tell them employment is like friendship, two are required to be friends but one is enough to walk away. The other day a good guy quit because he found something that interested him more. Thought he was wrong to quit but didn't tell him. Told him the same thing. His decision. Period.
Barbara Corcoran on how she fires people
1
4
9
2,464