New Publication (in French) : Linguistic Prostheses: Typology, Authorship, and Proletarization. In Gefen Alexandre & Huneman Philippe (Eds), Philosophies of AI: thinking and writing with LLMs, Intellectica, 81, (pp.135-161)
intellectica.org/en/linguist…
This article proposes a classification of linguistic prostheses, which are tools, devices, or technologies that transform the writing process. The concept of linguistic prosthesis brings together a wide variety of mediation devices under a single name. What they all have in common, however, is that they open up questions of authorship and the possible proletarianization of writing skills. Questions of authorship are central to many economic and legal processes involving the rights and responsibilities of authors. Questions of proletarianization touch on social issues of great importance linked to inequalities in writing skills, indirectly affecting questions as vast as the future of work or representativeness in democracy
One of the conclusions of the article is that the issue of extending or supporting linguistic capabilities with prostheses is essentially linked to the fact that the user generally doesn't own them, but at best, simply rents access to them. The behavior of the prosthesis may change depending on the subscription taken out, or just when the underlying language model is updated. In the long term, the user has no guarantee of either their accessibility or the quality of their performance. The coupled system is therefore fundamentally unstable. Given these intrinsic fragilities, it seems important that the user should be able to maintain autonomous control over his or her linguistic skills, regardless of their extension by the prostheses.
The article also stresses that the use of prostheses should be studied from the more specific angle of a loss of critical knowledge and the risk of new forms of control and influence made possible by their intermediation in linguistic flows. This more subtle form of proletarianization - a control of society through a control of linguistic devices - can be understood as the implementation by machines of linguistic politics of which there are examples in history. Given the nature of the entities that today control the most linguistic capital, forms of commercially motivated bias must also be considered. If these fears are well-founded, in this second perspective, the possibility of decoupling with the prosthesis is no longer a risk, but a possible escape from a control device.
—
Check also the other articles (some in French, some in English) of the issue curated by Alexandre Gefen & Philippe Huneman
Philosophy of AI: Thinking and Writing with LLMs by Alexandre Gefen and Philippe Huneman :
intellectica.org/en/philosop…
On the Semantics of Large Language Models by Martin Schüle
intellectica.org/en/semantic…
The Human and the Mechanical: logos, Veridicality Judgment, and GPT Models by Anastasia Giannakidou and Alda Mari
intellectica.org/en/human-an…
About a Pseudo-Knowledge: Large Language Models and the Replika Hypothesis by Philippe Huneman
intellectica.org/en/about-ps…
Knowing with Large Language Models: a Paradigmatic Break by Stéphan-Eloïse Gras and Gaël Varoquaux
intellectica.org/en/knowing-…
Generative Grammars, Minimal Operations and LLMs: True and False Problems by Pierre-Yves Modicom
intellectica.org/en/generati…
The artificial image: Portrait of Edmond de Belamy by Alexandre Gefen
intellectica.org/en/artifici…
Artificial Agency and Large Language Models
by Maud van Lier and Gorka Muñoz-Gil
intellectica.org/en/artifici…
Playing with à Chat(GPT)? the Ludic Side of Appropriating AI Technologies by Lionel Obadia
intellectica.org/en/playing-…
To Understand AI Sentience, First Understand it in Animals by Jonathan Birch and Kristin Andrews
intellectica.org/en/understa…