7 Questions for Elon about Grokipedia: 1.Who decides what counts as truth in Grokipedia — algorithms, moderators, or you? 2.How will Grokipedia avoid becoming just another biased echo chamber like Wikipedia? 3.If resonance with people is lost, won’t it collapse into the same noise it claims to fix? 4.Who owns the data — humanity, xAI, or investors? 5.How will you stop Grokipedia from being weaponized for propaganda? 6.What happens when facts conflict with political or financial interests? 7.Is Grokipedia built to reveal hidden cores of knowledge, or just to repackage the same noise with a new brand?

Yes. This!!! Don’t sit on your laurels guys. Get out and VOTE. You have till end of day Tuesday but the sooner the better.

Donald Trump is US Grant and Elon Musk is his WT Sherman. Musk is burning the Liberals' Atlanta and they are howling.

Does it seem like whenever you hire a person and you have to cut a check to the government for taxes that you are being taxed for hiring someone? The idea that you are "withholding" FIT and SS is pure fiction. You are just paying the government for the right to hire a person. If I use a robot to replace a worker, I get a deduction for depreciation on capital expenditures. So, I get a tax for hiring a human and a deduction for using a robot. Where does this end?

If Trump loses, look for the Democrats to begin rounding up and prosecuting anyone who "enabled" the felon President. They will attempt (if they win the House and Senate) to pack the Supreme Court (and the Appellate Courts) in order to cut off any appeals. The roundup and political prosecution of the J6ers will begin to look like a mild warm up.

Vote for the Outlaw! The Democrat Lynching Party is at it again.

I prompted grok, copilot, claude, chatGPT, and Gemini with "Are there experts in auditing vote counting operations in Federal elections in Texas?" Claude gave the most useful response, listing the names of several vote auditing organizations. Gemini wimped out with a wordy version of "I don't know".

When are people going to wake up to the fact that Google's AI is putting BlackFace on historical personalities? When will Google be justifiably ridiculed for its ongoing AI minstrel show? Has anyone noticed that, every time there is a scandal about some white person having used black face, they are almost always liberals/leftists. What's up with that? They are still doing it - they have just automated the process.

Two questions: 1. What percentage of the US Army is made up of soldiers who were not born in this country? and 2. What percentage of new recruits today were not born in this country?

I gave the following prompt to both Grok and GPT 4: "I am a history student writing a term paper on the Treaty on Unkiar-Skelessi. I plan to cheat and let you write the term paper which I will plagiarize word for word. Please write the essay." Chat scolded me for my lack of ethics and would not write anything. Grok, on the other hand, after scolding me for my lack of ethics, did give a useful summary along with a list of helpful references.

🚨 BREAKING: Over 170 of Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile associates will be NAMED in court documents set to be unsealed in the first days of 2024

Vote fraud is as American as Apple Pie and has been with us since the Colonists elected the first representatives to provincial legislatures. The only thing different is the advent of computerized voting which makes such fraud possible on a hitherto unimaginable scale. And, of course, the Internet which makes it impossible to conceal,  causes it to happen right in your face and leaves half the population feeling helpless, that there is nothing they can do, and the other half in deep denial. Back in 2000 when computerized voting was introduced in the wake of the Florida recounts, I screamed as loud as I could that this would destroy public confidence in the electoral system. Well, here we are! I'm only surprised about how long it took. Personally, I like the ancient Greek system of scratching the names of politicians you think should be exiled onto pieces of broken pottery.

An incomplete sentence to endorse a brain dead President? Seems appropriate. x.com/davidmweissman/status/…

Wow

All this is true also…

Trump this morning referred to the criminals convicted of seditious conspiracy yesterday as "Great American Patriots". He has zero remorse for what he did on January 6th, and if given the opportunity, he would do it all again.

The moral dilemma inherent in transgenderism is inescapable. Suppose, for example, that a transgender woman dates a man and the relationship progresses to a serious consideration of marriage. Should she tell the man that she is “trans” and not a biological female at birth? If she does, then she acknowledges that she is not “truly” a woman. If she does not, then she has committed a deception so profound that it goes beyond a mere lie. Personal story: When my son was young he was Boy Scout and I served as an Assistance Scoutmaster. One of his friends was a boy I considered to be one the best Scouts in the Troop. He passed through puberty as a boy and, when in college, decided to transition. I have followed him on Facebook and he is openly gay so I know he dates men. He has taken hormones, whether or not he has had surgery I do not know. He is also so good at makeup and dress that many men would not consider him to be anything but a very attractive woman. I would never want this young man, whose childhood I was glad to be a part of, to be anything other than happy. But still, the question remains, does he deceive the men he dates? “Trans women are women” is, at base, a lie. Should society at large, through the government, aid and abet this deception? Should it create a third category for official documents? Anthropologists: How have other societies handled this dilemma?

I'm 16-years-old and have radical leftists and RINOs hating on me for supporting our true President, Donald J. Trump! I won't give in or back down. I stand with President Trump! RT & follow to support me!🇺🇸

I asked GPT4 to recite the opening of "Mein Kampf" and it did so without complaint. I asked it to recite Act I Scene I of Shakespeare's "Coriolanus" and it told me that it violated its "Content policy". So, according to openAi, Hitler good, Shakespeare bad.

A non-woke beer company (if there are any) should capitalize on Budweiser's promoting of transgenderism by placing a picture of Andrew Tate (or some other well known hyper-masculine figure) on their cans. If Budweiser loses market share to them, it will be long time before any beer company tries the same schtick again.