Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @BarrettsGoat
this too, 6mfs on the court and called the ball back on a og 3 ball of doom😭 refs was on a mission
51
Replying to @LionsSyndicate
We got too many holes on this roster to be paying our backup rb the 7th highest paid in the league. This the consequence of paying mfs like Barnes and ect early for no reason. I agree with Brad on this note . We can’t keep everybody we paying like 6mfs a billion bucks already
4
261
FUCK I POSTED IM NOT DONE COME BACK LATER What's been happening in the last 2 days seems to be complex issue. Between today and yesterday I put in 5 hours of review work attempting to solve the issues. I wish it was simple and sometimes it is. However not this go. First thing is filtering out one of the most obvious culprits. Ratings... There's a tutorial here explaining the rating system: youtube.com/watch?v=u6N5BHa0… Green stars is perfect trading Yellow stars is management issue Red stars are horrific - I should of never done that trades In the case of the image below is a white line which is raw combined equity curve: Here's the issues that green line doesn't look good and that 15k trade is skewing the results. So lets filter out that trade. I created an outlier tag which I attach to overly large wins and losses. The biggest issue with tags - is if you have a large outlier win or loss it severely skews your tags and all the data attached. For anyone taking tradecraft.club seriously, and is trying to improve I highly recommend an outlier tag. Another user came up with the idea and it's been solid. We can see now that the green trades which are what I consider perfect are not performing. The yellow is management issues but that's not horrible. Obviously the red stars are kicking my ass and there's 10 of them in the past 2 days out of 30 trades. This is 1/3rd of my trades being shit trades. So that's something that needs to be addressed. However the 20 trades that are green and yellow combined PNL means I'd be down -$5932.40 Something else is a problem here. Can we filter are way into an answer? Usually the blue line performs very well which is conservative trading. But they went to hell. What I know that's not coming from tags is these trades were instant losers. I'd cut them fast which is good to do. But the amount of 0 MFE trades I had were high. There were 16 trades with 0 through 2 MFE. The markets have been somewhat fast the last 2 days. So 2 MFE doesn't have as much weight in higher vol as the dwell time to exit is virtually nothing and I can't react. Notice the hold times as well. Only 2 trades exceeded a minute. It doesn't take tags for me to know that I kept getting rugged. I can straight up tell you because I kept complaining about it. Wait a minute? Did I mention complaining? Yes I did. So lets check emotions which is in the above screen shot. 10 Trades didn't have total clarity. But for some reason total clarity on 18 trades came out -$2213.08. Okay so I'm clear on price action but I lost? What happened? I don't know I'm still attempting to narrow this down. If we look at the green emotions Calm 3, Content 3, Patience 3, I'm not performing there either. So emotions when ideal still lead to shit PNL. What is going on? Unfortunately sometimes our tags just wont tell us the issue. So we use the next best tool in our arsenal. Our brains, and trade recordings. My speculation is the market was too fucking fast that I can't keep up with tracking deltas. I trade stale deltas or I'm getting in confliction zones. I'm too far from the signals when entering. I ran a replay today and attempted to upkeep my analysis. I can say for a fact I'm too fucking slow. Is this causing all the issues? No. But it doesn't help. I need automation. It takes a tremendous amount of conscious effort to manually draw and keep up with things. During my review I noticed what I had marked was not part of what was actually there. And certain signals were there that I didn't see yet. This does not help. Now I have some management tags I've share in prior posts - which I won't share here as I'm image limited on X. However Ill go over them now. MFS which performs well sucked. Most trades had MFS so that's telling me there's still an issue here I'm not catching. 17 trades had MFS and I lost -$12,154.02 13 trades did not have MFS and I only lost -$1776.40 Fuck man I'm like in the land of backwards here. I've done a lot of the right things. But the performance has left? I can tell you the spoofing was relentless. High volume pushes met with low volume hits right back the other way. This rugging certainly did not help. But rugging is always there so can we rule this as a culprit? Nah - I refuse to blame the algos and bury my head like so many retail traders that don't attempt to narrow it down. -Flip hit tags did well than tanked to -$2,244.90 -Only 2 impulsive trades -$1,743.12 -One getting married to a trade that cost -$2443.98 -Not gathering information cost -$4960.84 -Didn't see a pattern cost -$6794.90 So these above tags maybe combinations where some of them are attached to each other. The didn't see pattern and not gathering information may be some of the same trades. However isolated we can see some real issues here. Didn't see a pattern is a sample size of 8 trades. So a chunk of the 30 total trades when the outlier is removed. That's a problem and that's confirming the fact shit was too fast and I couldn't play upkeep. This is where some form of automation will help. Not gathering information was 7 trades. I need to figure out how many of these are combined with the prior tag of not seeing pattern. -Not gathering information standalone - 1 trade -Didn't see pattern standalone - 2 trades The way this is achieved is just some easy filtering magic. I make a new equity curve add the one tag like not gathering information and add a widget tag to filter out - didn't see pattern - so any married tags will be removed leaving the standalones. Next we add dual tags on in the series setting to see the combos of both. That would be 6 trades combo. So 9 total trades losing a total of $5803.96 all but one trade was a red star out of those when I apply the remove red star filter.... Hmmm. So trades I knew were shit just lacked good information or I didn't see. Okay but in between my yellow and green star trades I'm still down -$5392.40 so where the fuck are those loses coming from? Man I should of wrote this in a blog so you can see the filtering process. I'm really beating on tradecraft.club right now attempting to squeeze it. We should isolate the MFS tags I've talked about in prior posts. So with a master page filter removing red stars and the outlier tag. I can see right off the rip 3MFS is really kicking my ass at -$6784.98 I thought this was an issue. I even mentioned I wouldn't trade it today but I did at a 4 sample size losing -$2398.74 today alone. A 4 factor which historically does well lost me -$1396.56 today at sample size 1. Needless to say it was simple a good loss. But I'm afraid that a lot of trades were "good losses" seeing how my green stars lost money. 5 factors dominated today at $2097.82 Between 2 days of trading with no outlier and no redstars: -6MFS $956.88 -5MFS $2097.82 -4MFS -$832.80 -3MFS -$6784.98 SHIT I CAN'T ADD MORE PHOTOS!!! Ugh we're going to blog format. Fuck X. I'm in edit mode and this should allow 4 photos. Okay so there's a handful of management issues on 3MFS losing -$1948.74 4 sample size of green star 3MFS was -$4836.24 which tells me maybe 3MFS just wont fucking cut it? If I filter out red stars, outlier, and 3MFS I'd be up $1375.34 in 2 days on 12 trades by no means impressive. The green stars would yield $2811.58 Why are the 4MFS sucking those usually do well? 3 had management issues and the other 2 were green stars but one was just an unlucky loser. On the management issues it was a combination of exit issues. 2 won and I needed to hold more on those and the other loser I held 2 long. Just nuanced trade specific stuff. Conclusions. So I think it's a lot of issues. Not one. Kind of like an airliner crashing. It's usually many things going wrong not just one. An orgy of issues here. A lot of the times I can go "oh I know EXACTLY what the problem is!!!"
5
1,012
2LWs 6MFs 2CBs 1GK Serious uncomfortable conversations and questions need to be held about Perez, managements and the elders of the club.
20 Apr 2025
🚨 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐋 𝐌𝐀𝐃𝐑𝐈𝐃 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐗𝐈
2
4
325
NWCG Executive Board is proud to present the Creativity and Innovation Award to the 6 Minutes for Safety Subcommittee! 🏆 Their outstanding work has fostered open dialogue, peer collaboration, and a stronger culture of safety. nwcg.gov/committee/6-minutes… 📷Ben Evens, 6MFS Chair
4
354
LNB24回目6M 6MFSって何? 八橋通2、5道中後半、6道中×2、針妙丸通2、通4
14
272
What can make a firefighter successful at adapting or flexing? 👉Learn about adaptability/flexibility during high-tempo periods at nwcg.gov/6mfs/leadership/ada… #NWCG #6MFS
2
13
555
🌲🔥 Although most wildland fires occur in remote areas, there are situations where fires are along rural country roads or major highways. Learn how to appropriately respond to roadside incidents in today’s #6MFS 🚒 🔗 nwcg.gov/6mfs/vehicles-roads…
1
3
311
👀 Firefighting is often exhausting work and firefighters can find themselves needing to sleep while on the fireline. Before pausing to rest, know this #6MFS 🔗 nwcg.gov/6mfs/operational-en… #NWCG #6MFS
2
3
627
👀 Checkout this WFSTAR: Latest Research on Estimating Safety Zones video in today’s #6MFS to find out what’s going on in the world of safety zone research 🔥💨 youtu.be/FOxPyvBSewA
3
6
752
Leader’s intent is a clear and concise statement about what people must do to succeed in their assignments. It delineates three essential components: ✅Task ✅Purpose ✅End State #6MFS 👉 nwcg.gov/6mfs/leadership/lea…
3
10
413
When an individual feels an assignment is unsafe, they have the obligation to identify safe alternatives. Do you know how to properly turn down an unsafe assignment? #6MFS 👉 nwcg.gov/6mfs/operational-en…
1
4
11
1,036
In a learning organization, leaders treat honest mistakes as opportunities to learn and do better next time. Find more information about developing a learning organization at👉 nwcg.gov/6mfs/leadership/dev… #NWCG #6MFS
1
8
420
We train and practice fire shelter deployment – so why do we hesitate to use them? What is the apprehension? In today’s 6MFS learn why some firefighters hesitate to use their fire shelters 👉 nwcg.gov/6mfs/operational-en…
2
3
316
The use of ATVs for wildland fire suppression and prescribed fire operations has increased dramatically over the last ten years. When do most injuries associated with ATVs occur? nwcg.gov/6mfs/vehicles-roads… #NWCG #6MFS
1
4
434
Fire leaders build cohesive teams—not simply groups of individuals putting forth individual efforts—to accomplish missions in high-risk environments. What is the difference between a team and a group? nwcg.gov/6mfs/leadership/bui… #NWCG #6MFS
7
15
864
It’s been a long season. Take the time to do a quick stress check on yourself or others. 🤝 👉 nwcg.gov/6mfs/firefighter-he… #NWCG #6MFS
1
9
14
1,500
🔥 Escape Routes 3 🔥 Does access to escape routes become more difficult as the day progresses? Do you have more than one escape route? Are all escape routes clearly marked? Are all firefighters familiar with the escape routes? 🔗nwcg.gov/6mfs/operational-en… #NWCG #6MFS
7
8
510
🔥 Escape Routes 2 🔥 Have you ever timed yourself using an escape route? Look at the times below. If your fire blows up right now, can you, and every member of your crew, make it to your safety zone? #NWCG #6MFS 🔗 nwcg.gov/6mfs/operational-en…
3
420