Why don’t you watch the arraignment. You might learn a few things. This was before the bullshit conspiracy, where Killer Karen chose to blame everyone who was there FOR her! Why’d she call Kerry at 5am and say John was dead/hit by a plow, if they’d not even went out looking for him yet? Why’d she even involve Kerry when she wasn’t even with them the night prior? Why’d Killer NEVER ask Jen what happened in the house? Cuz she knew he NEVER went into the house!! youtube.com/live/QnHEtJJsESA…

A man charged in connection with a deadly shooting at a Cape Cod restaurant over the weekend was ordered held without bail at his arraignment Monday. on.nbcboston.com/Rqa6yWg

Here at the Odell Horton Federal Building awaiting the arraignment of Shelby County Court Clerk Tami Sawyer Scheduled for 1:30p, updates on charges to come soon

I've just been reading up on former Min. Lefoko Moagi's case, from him being appointed in 2019 to his arrest and arraignment in early 2026. Monna, politicians are greedy autlwe.... When you realize this corruption accused former minister was the BDPs campaign manager in the 2024 general elections, you get a sense of why they lost the elections... DGB ne a bua nnete, re votile ka maikutlo and I don't blame those who harbour extreme resentment for the mighty red jack... That being daid, I hope he fingers his cronies and they all get life in prison...🤞🏿

Detective Chief Newport Lanford Silent on Rosser’s Card The Atlanta Constitution June 11, 1913 Detective Chief Says He Has No Reply to Make to the Charges of Counsel for Leo M. Frank. Following the public letter written yesterday by Luther Z. Rosser, counsel for Leo Frank, Detective Chief Newport Lanford said that he had no reply to make to the charges and that hereafter he intended to adopt a policy of silence. The chief smiled frequently while reading the attorney's statement, but be positively declined to comment on it. "Henceforth," he stated briefly, "It will be the attitude of the detective department to avoid publicity. It should have been done heretofore." Lanford declared that Rosser's card is only an attempt to draw the detective chief into a newspaper controversy, which he intended to avert. "It is all a scheme—nothing else," he said, "and I do not propose to be made a victim." The statement of Frank's counsel is a scathing arraignment of Chief Lanford and his department for alleged efforts to prove guilty a white man, against whom prejudice had been created, through the "lying" stories of a negro, against whom all "legitimate" suspicion already was directed. It follows: Mr. Rosser's Statement. Dear Editor, Atlanta Constitution: Felder and Lanford, in an effort to make progress in their feud, charge each other with giving aid to Leo Frank. Lanford charges that Felder was employed by Frank and is seeking for that reason to shield him. Felder charges Lanford and his associates are also seeking, for some reason, to shield and protect Frank. Both charges are untrue and, at a time when no harm could come to an innocent man, might well be treated antidotes to monotony. Unfortunately, however, the present situation is such that fair-minded citizens may be misled by these counter charges. Felder does not, nor has he at any time, directly or indirectly, represented Frank. For Lanford to charge the contrary does Frank a serious injustice. Felder Against Frank. If Chief Lanford had been in a sane, normal mood, he would have known that every act of Felder has been against Frank. The engagement of the Burns agency ought to have satisfied Lanford. No detective agency of half prudence would have double-crossed the Atlanta department in the Phagan case. Nor did Felder have excuse for suspicion against Lanford. There was reason to suspect his fairness, his accuracy and the soundness of his methods, but not his reckless zeal against Frank. Had Felder been in a calm mood I am sure he would never have charged the chief and his associates with intention to help Frank. Lanford at once, as soon as Felder charged him with favoring Frank, settled in his mind the guilt of Frank, and from that monent has bent every energy of his department, not in finding the murderer, but in trying to prove to the public that Felder was wrong in charging him with trying to shield Frank. Leo Frank's Past. His department has exhausted itself in an effort to fix upon Frank an immoral life, on the theory that a violator of the seventh commandment was likewise a murderer. This effort has failed. No man in Atlanta has had his moral character subjected to such a test and there is not in the whole city of Atlanta a half dozen men who could have more successfully stood the test. His employees, without a single exception, have made affidavits to his uprightness. Lanford's department subpoenaed every one of them before the coroner's jury, and after keeping them more than two days did not dare to swear a single one of them. Before and after the coroner's verdict this whole city has been combed with a fine tooth comb and a like combing has been applied to Brooklyn, the city of his birth, to find something against his moral character. With what result? The silence of the detective department gives the answer. "Drivel and Nonsense." Lanford's conduct in connection wtih the woman Formby and the negro Conley shows that he was stung by Felder's charge that he was favoring Frank, or that for some other reason he was temporarily out of his head. He swallowed whole the statements of this Formby woman, bearing upon their face the clear proof that they were by no means to be believed. This woman was not unknown to Lanford. She did not entrap him by appearing under the guise of a truthful, sober virtuous woman. But so absorbed was he, either in trying to disprove Felder's charge or in the foolish pride of opinion that he accepted without doubt or fair investigation the drived and nonsense of this woman. So far beside himself did he become that he had the folly to furnish to the papers, based upon this woman's statement, the theory that Frank, during the night of the murder, wishing to rid himself of the body, was seeking to do so in a room rented from this woman. The folly and difficulties of the theory did not disturb Lanford. They would have disturbed anybody but Lanford. His insane desire to justify himself cleared the matter of all difficulties and follies. Conley an Ignorant Negro. If the case of the Formby woman did not clear Lanford of Felder's charge, that of the Conley negro ought to have done so. Conley is a very ordinary, ignorant, brutal negro, not unacquainted with the stockade. His actions immediately after the crime were suspicious. So much so that they attracted the attention of the employees of the factory and occasioned general comment. In spite of these facts, Conley was not taken into custody until several days after the crime and not then until the employees of the factory caught him suspiciously washing a shirt and as a result reported him to the police. He was not brought before the coroner's jury and practically no notice was taken of him in that investigation. So swiftly was Lanford and his associates pursuing Frank that they ran over this negro, standing in their path with the marks of guilt clearly upon him. Finally, the pressure of public suspicion brought this negro to Lanford's attention. Conley began to talk and negro-like to talk so as to protect himself and as a means thereto to cast suspicion upon some one else. Ordinarily the detectives could be trusted not to aid the negro in an effort to clear himself by placing the crime on a white man, but in this case it is to be feared that the negro was not discouraged. Lanford had finally banked all his sense, all his reputation as a man and a politician upon Frank's guilt and it would be remarkable if the discouraged this negro from involving Frank. If Lanford and his followers had acted wisely, and kept open minds seeking only the murderer and not seeking to vindicate their announced opinions the negro would have by this hold the whole truth. Conley made one statement. It did not meet the announced opinions of Lanford. He made another. This second was not up to the mark, it did not sufficiently show Frank's guilt. Another was made, which was supposed to be nearer the mark. Whereupon there was great rejoicing. Forgetting all others, this last statement—reached through such great tribulations—was proclaimed the truth, the last truth and that there would be no other statement. The detectives had at last got the statement which they thought sustained their views, saved their reputations and insured their places. Full of Contradictions. But what a statement! So full of contradictions, so evidently made for self protection and wherein was so easily apparent the guiding hand of detectives. If Lanford meant to be fair, if was only seeking the truth, why did he rush into print with the assertion that this statement was the truth and therefore of necessity the last? Might he not in decency have left this negro to his own will unbiased by the opinion that the statement was true and the last to be given? Who knows but that this negro might have given numerous other statements if he had not been so heavily handicapped by Lanford's opinion. The truth is this negro is not to give any other or further statement if the detective department can prevent, unless made under their supervision and direction. He must, at all times, be under the influence and control of Lanford. He must have Lanford's sucking bottle at all times to his lips, sucking Lanford's views and theories of this case. The ragged places in his statement must be darned, the torn places patched and no one but the detective department could be trusted to do that. Thinks Conley Guilty. No one has been rude enough to bring this negro before the grand jury nor indeed to make any charge against him. After the statement of this negro and in view of all the evidence which so strongly points to him as the slayer of little Mary Phagan, is the grand jury to leave him without charge or investigation to be wet nursed by Lanford until Frank's trial? Or is it the purpose to keep the negro's case from the grand jury in the nature of an offered reward to spur him on to swear his worst against the white man? Would it not be just and decent to bring this negro's case before the grand jury and let that body hear his confession so that it can then decide whether the negro should then be indicted? In the shadow of this great crime let there be no thimble-ringing; let no single fact be concealed; let no man's place or reputation stand in the way of the fullest, fairest investigation. Respectfully, (Signed) LUTHER Z. ROSSER.

This is from his 2nd arraignment. LOL

god this arraignment is KILLER. i love how they always bring new life to songs that they've played dozens of times!! it really does capture the melancholy and loneliness of the lyrics, like you're floating alone in space. i love dragon pony !!!!

Brianna, who was nine months pregnant, gave birth four days before her arraignment in connection with the stabbing. [GOD HAVE PITY ON THAT POOR CHILD] During the arraignment, her defense attorney tried to claim the worker sparked the assault by saying that she didn’t “give a f–k” about the food order mixup, They claim she started throwing things at the sisters first. [TIME WILL TELL - THE JUDGE SEEMS TO THINK OTHERWISE] The new mother pleaded with the judge to be released from jail, stating that she was innocent and had a 4-day-old baby at home, the outlet reported. The judge, however, ordered Brianna held on a $25,000 cash bond and Kierianna on a $100,000 cash bond after they pleaded not guilty. [THE JUDGE HAS SEEN THE VIDEO]

Saturday, June 13, 2026, at approximately 3:41 AM in Downtown Houston, Texas. Officers pulled Harden over for a traffic violation and observed an unsecured handgun sitting in plain view on the seat (or cup holder) of his Mercedes rather than in a holster. Harden was charged with Misdemeanor unlawful carrying of a weapon in a motor vehicle. He was booked into the Harris County Jail and released a few hours later after posting a $100 bond. Harden's release comes with strict bond conditions, including a complete prohibition from possessing firearms, ammunition, or consuming alcohol and controlled substances. He must also submit to random urinalysis testing. His official court arraignment is scheduled for June 22, 2026.

The owner of a Chinese restaurant in Brighton will face a trial after he denied rape at a hearing at Hove Crown Court. Kin Sing Luk, 58, of Selborne Place, Hove, entered a plea of not guilty at an arraignment hearing on Friday (12 June). brightonandhovenews.org/2026…

He also said that if he DID have kids, there would be an arraignment in his will for an amount set aside, for their college education, etc. All of these facts prove he had good intentions for others.

When I was in jail I worked in the kitchen. I used to make the bologna sandwiches they give you while awaiting processing, court, arraignment, trial ect. I would make them all different so people fought. Some people got 5 pieces of meat some 1 piece. It was wrong but I was bored

Robinson is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. However, there is enough evidence that convinced Utah’s county magistrate that there is reasonable doubt he committed the crime and hold him in custody without bail. At prelims it will be decided whether there is enough reasonable doubt the case shall go to trial. Him entering a plea at the arraignment can also be a decision factor whether the case will be moved to trial or not. Erika is not a suspect, was not a suspect and neither is TPUSA and whatever garbage you’re throwing at them and accuse them of cannot and would never sustain itself in the court of law.

🚔 LPR Alert Leads to Recovery of Stolen Vehicle and Two Arrests 🚔 On June 13, 2026, at approximately 2:04 pm, Greece Police officers monitoring the department’s License Plate Reader (LPR) system received an alert for a reported stolen 2026 Chevrolet Traverse traveling in the area of Edgemere Dr. The vehicle had been reported stolen by the NFTA Transit Police in Buffalo on June 9, 2026. Officers responding to the area quickly located the vehicle on Edgemere Drive and conducted a traffic stop. The driver, Harri Kendrick, 21, of Rochester, and the passenger, Taijohn Odell Lewis, 20, of Rochester, were detained without incident. Kendrick was charged with Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Second Degree and Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle in the Third Degree. Lewis was charged with Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle in the Third Degree. Both individuals were transported to Greece Police Headquarters for processing and were later transported to the Monroe County Jail for CAP Court arraignment. The stolen vehicle, valued at approximately $59,000, was recovered and removed from the scene. This incident highlights the continued effectiveness of the Greece Police Department’s License Plate Reader network and the proactive efforts of officers to identify stolen vehicles, recover property, and hold offenders accountable.

Arraignment in the seashells-by-the-seashore case of James Comey is set for Sept. 30. Jury trial in October Judge has just ordered that outside groups STOP trying to file briefs in the case "Defendant and the government are ably represented by competent counsel"

Nigeria’s DSS Demonstrates Double Standards Again, Arraigns News Host On Trumped-Up Charges On June 8, 2026, Nigeria’s Department of State Services (DSS) arraigned news presenter, Paul Jibrin Oweleke, on charges of cybercrime and treason. Oweleke had allegedly called for the military overthrow of Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, after previously expressing concerns about the efficacy of democracy in Africa, and pointing to Burkina Faso as an apt example of an alternative path. This arraignment follows in a long pattern of Nigeria’s security agencies arresting, detaining, torturing and arraigning Nigerian citizens on trumped-up charges. As crime and t*rrorism continue to become the order of the day in Nigeria, the country’s security personnel continue to prove that they are far more concerned with protecting its Western-aligned government from criticism, than safeguarding the lives of its over 242 million citizens.

The following NASA Temperature chart updates my similar posting from yesterday, 14th June, it starts from five years earlier, 1946, and ends five years later in 2025. Its arraignment is still based on the logical reasoning there wasn’t a great deal of coverage of official weather stations placed prior to this period. This is part of my personal investigation to try and reinvent the temperature wheel, and may well turn out to be regarded as a folly, but I won’t let that get in the way of trying. The observation is based on the calculation of baseline results, in that they should always calculate to zero. And when used correctly they demonstrate the actual difference between the two sets of data. This is a 70 year base, from 1946-2015, to measure how much has changed during the period/decade 2016-2025. The result is 0.79C. I would argue that the interpretation of this analysis is that there has been an average increase of approximately 0.14C per decade. However @grok informs me that I should also demonstrate previous decadal measurements. So, with that in mind, and not trying to bore everyone, I’ve done this with the respective decadal data using 60, 50, 40, 30, 20 year with non-static baselines. All this means is that I use previous decades to make a measurement for the next. In summary over the past 70 years our planet has warmed by at least 0.79C. Any other calculations are based on guess work, however my apologies in advance if people were recording data in the Amazon Jungle, deepest Africa or the Antarctic prior to 1946. Those of you will note the content of the following baseline uses different data to the top table, this is because a base makes a readjustment each time it’s used. So the next base, for 80 years, will change the current measurement of 0.79c to a lower figure. The biggest change can be seen in the last period, 2016-2025. As this change wasn’t as dramatic as my previous posting, for the period 2010-2020, it has to be stated the pronounced change you are seeing was between 2021-2025. And that is very likely to do with the historic Underwater Volcanic Eruption at Hunga Tonga in January 2022. The influence of this episode actually changed the level of Water Vapour content in the atmosphere. The scientific community were not unanimous in regarding how this event may have influenced world temperatures, but suspect WV, although being regarded as only a feedback mechanism, in spite of the primary greenhouse gas, may have had more to this increase in world temperatures than previously understood. Time will tell if my opinion proves to be correct. The sixty million dollar question is, what is it that’s being measured in the aforementioned data. I have no doubt it’s NOT the effect of man made CO2, it’s far to small to make any significant change, however CO2 on its own, incorporating natural factors, but my guess it’s just content Water Vapour, on the basis science is never settled, and WV may well have a bigger influence and it’s not entirely understood.

The following NASA Temperature chart may seem controversial, in that it starts from 1951. Its arraignment is based on the logical reasoning there wasn’t a great deal of coverage of official weather stations placed, to make world measurements until this period. My investigation to try and reinvent the temperature wheel may well turn out to be regarded as a folly, but I won’t let that get in the way of trying. First observation is that the calculation of a baseline results in a zero, in that, whatever you are trying to use as a point of reference starts at zero. This is a 60 year base, from 1951-2010, to measure how much has changed during the period/decade 2011-2020. The result is 0.62C. I would argue that the interpretation of this analysis is that there has been an average increase of approximately 0.1C per decade. However @grok informs me that I should demonstrate previous decadal measurements. So, with that in mind, and not trying to bore everyone, I’ve done this with the respective decadal data using 50, 40, 30, 20 year baselines. In summary over the past 60 years our planet has warmed by at least 0.62C. Any other calculations are based on guess work, however my apologies in advance if people were recording data in the Amazon Jungle, deepest Africa or the Antarctic prior to the 1950’s. Those of you will note the content of the following baseline uses different data to the top table, this is because a base makes a readjustment each time it’s used. So the next base, for 70 years, will change the current measurement of 0.62c to a lower figure. The sixty million dollar question is, what is it that’s being measured. I have no doubt it’s not the effect of man made CO2, CO2 on its own maybe, but my guess it’s Water Vapour.

The Federal Government has commenced the mass arraignment of more than 400 alleged terrorism suspects at the Federal High Court in Abuja. The suspects are facing charges including terrorism, terrorism financing, and aiding insurgent groups.

The Federal Government has commenced the mass arraignment of more than 400 alleged terrorism suspects at the Federal High Court in Abuja. The suspects are facing charges including terrorism, terrorism financing, and aiding insurgent groups.