Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Oh that is definitely happening - not sure when, watch this space.
1
6
Do you think this is because more serious allegations are soon to emerge in the public eye
1
1
12
Her 'BBC Apprentice' video seems to have been removed from this page, also, the link to #Apprentice on her 'Baroness Karren Brady CBE' home page is defunct! That's seems to be what is missing.
1
1
14
Scrap the whole damned show then.
1
7
Not easy to do that, she has a major role in the program. I wonder if it’s too late to replace her?
1
8
With the BBC’s track record on protecting sex offenders, I’m not sure they’ll want to get involved in another scandal. 😳
1
1
75
I think the BBC should exclude KB until such time any legal proceedings involving DS have been completed, anything otherwise may/could damage BBC reputation….
1
24
RippleStarterUK retweeted
Will Karren Brady @karren_brady be allowed to appear in the next series of @bbcapprentice by the @BBC with Alan Sugar @Lord_Sugar? #KarrenBrady #AlanSugar #TheApprentice #BBC #DavidSullivan #WestHam #AmpikaPickston #TellyBoxTrash
0% Hell yeah; she's the star
75% God no; they'll sack her
25% I haven't the foggiest
8 votes • 12 hours
2
5
6
790
Dave retweeted
Karren Brady @karren_brady needs to be told: "You're fired!" by Alan Sugar, but more so by the @BBC @bbcapprentice. She should be taken off the telly box and also hurled out of the House of Lords. Get this Overpainted Aunt Sally gone! #KarrenBrady #DavidSullivan #WestHam #TheApprentice #AlanSugar #BBC #OverpaintedAuntSally #Filth #Scum #GetHerGone
Impossible for Baroness Brady to stay as a judge on The Apprentice after a BBC investigation showed she had known for three years that West Ham owner David Sullivan ( she was his Vice Chair and had worked for him for decades) was banned by the FA from contacting the women’s teams because of safeguarding concerns. Brady, 57, has been spraying around legal letters to the media warning them about any suggestion she knew anything about the sex allegations involving Sullivan. Her lawyers now say that although she was aware, she was not involved, in the decision made by West Ham in conjunction with the local authority and the FA to impose the restrictions. This is belter from the lawyers; They said there was no inconsistency or hypocrisy between her support for women’s rights and working for a bloke who was perceived to present a sufficient risk to women he was prevented from contacting them.
3
9
38
1,749
The fact she is terrible at Business should be enough
1
38