Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
μ•ˆλ“œλ ˆμ΄ μΉ΄νŒŒμ‹œκ°€ μ˜μ•„ 올린 곡, μ§€μ‹μ˜ κΉƒν—ˆλΈŒ μ‹œλŒ€κ°€ μ˜¨λ‹€ 1. μ•ˆλ“œλ ˆμ΄ μΉ΄νŒŒμ‹œμ˜ μ˜΅μ‹œλ””μ–Έ ν™œμš©λ²• κ³΅κ°œλŠ” λ‹¨μˆœν•œ 도ꡬ μΆ”μ²œμ΄ μ•„λ‹ˆλ‹€. 천재적 κ°œλ°œμžκ°€ μžμ‹ μ˜ 사고 체계λ₯Ό μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ μ‹œκ°ν™”ν•˜κ³  ν™•μž₯ν•˜λŠ”μ§€ κ·Έ '섀계도'λ₯Ό 보여쀀 사건이닀. μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ€ 이제 결과물보닀 κ·Έ 과정에 μ—΄κ΄‘ν•˜κΈ° μ‹œμž‘ν–ˆλ‹€^^ 2. 직μž₯μΈλ“€μ—κ²Œ 인곡지λŠ₯ 유료 κ΅¬λ…λ£ŒλŠ” μΌμ’…μ˜ κ³ μ • μ§€μΆœμ΄λ‹€. ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ 업무 μ™Έμ—λŠ” 이 κ°•λ ₯ν•œ μ„±λŠ₯을 μŸμ•„λΆ€μ„ 곳이 λ§ˆλ•…μΉ˜ μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€. λ‚¨λŠ” 토큰을 μžμ‹ μ˜ λ‡Œλ₯Ό λ³΅μ œν•˜κ³  ν™•μž₯ν•˜λŠ” '지식 μ •μ œ'에 μ“°κΈ° μ‹œμž‘ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 문화적 흐름이 λ§Œλ“€μ–΄μ§„λ‹€. 3. ν΄λ‘œλ“œμ™€ 같은 κ±°λŒ€μ–Έμ–΄λͺ¨λΈμ€ νŒŒνŽΈν™”λœ λ©”λͺ¨λ₯Ό κ΅¬μ‘°ν™”λœ μ§€μ‹μœΌλ‘œ λ°”κΎΈλŠ” 데 νƒμ›”ν•˜λ‹€. λ‚΄κ°€ λ˜μ§„ λ‚™μ„œ 같은 생각듀을 인곡지λŠ₯이 논리적인 μ²΄κ³„λ‘œ 뢈렀주면, 그것을 κΉƒν—ˆλΈŒμ— κ³΅μœ ν•˜λ©° μžμ‹ μ˜ 지적 밀도λ₯Ό 증λͺ…ν•˜λŠ” μ±Œλ¦°μ§€κ°€ μœ ν–‰ν•  μˆ˜λ°–μ— μ—†λ‹€. 4. κΉƒν—ˆλΈŒλŠ” 더 이상 κ°œλ°œμžλ“€μ˜ μ½”λ“œ μ €μž₯μ†Œκ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλ‹€. μΈκ°„μ˜ κ³ μœ ν•œ 직관과 인곡지λŠ₯의 λ°©λŒ€ν•œ 데이터가 κ²°ν•©λœ 'μ§€λŠ₯의 μ „μ‹œμž₯'으둜 λ³€λͺ¨ν•œλ‹€. λˆ„κ°€ 더 μ •κ΅ν•˜κ²Œ μžμ‹ μ˜ 지식 μ°½κ³ λ₯Ό κ΅¬μΆ•ν–ˆλŠ”μ§€κ°€ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ λͺ…μ˜ˆκ°€ λ˜λŠ” μ‹œλŒ€λ‹€. 5. μ—¬κΈ°μ„œ μ˜μ™Έμ˜ λ°˜μ „μ€, 지식이 λ°©λŒ€ν•΄μ§ˆμˆ˜λ‘ 였히렀 '인곡지λŠ₯이 μ†λŒ€μ§€ μ•Šμ€ λ‚ κ²ƒμ˜ 짧은 λ©”λͺ¨'κ°€ κ°€μž₯ κ·€ν•œ λŒ€μ ‘μ„ λ°›κ²Œ λœλ‹€λŠ” 점이닀. κ°€κ³΅λœ 지식은 ν”ν•΄μ§€κ² μ§€λ§Œ, κ·Έ μ§€μ‹μ˜ 씨앗이 된 μΈκ°„μ˜ 졜초 μ•„μ΄λ””μ–΄λŠ” λ³΅μ œκ°€ λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯ν•˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€^^ 6. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 흐름은 개인이 μžμ‹ λ§Œμ˜ 'μ†Œκ·œλͺ¨ μ–Έμ–΄ λͺ¨λΈ(SLM)'을 κ΅¬μΆ•ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ 데이터 ν•™μŠ΅ μ€€λΉ„ 과정이기도 ν•˜λ‹€. λ‚˜μ€‘μ— λ‚˜λ₯Ό λŒ€μ‹ ν•΄ λŒ€λ‹΅ν•΄ 쀄 λ‚˜λ§Œμ˜ 인곡지λŠ₯을 λ§Œλ“€κΈ° μœ„ν•΄, μ§€κΈˆλΆ€ν„° κΉƒν—ˆλΈŒμ— μ–‘μ§ˆμ˜ 지식 데이터λ₯Ό μŒ“μ•„λ‘λŠ” μ…ˆμ΄λ‹€. 7. κ²°κ΅­ 미래의 이λ ₯μ„œλŠ” κ²½λ ₯ κΈ°μˆ μ„œκ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ κΉƒν—ˆλΈŒμ— μŒ“μΈ μ§€μ‹μ˜ κΉŠμ΄μ™€ ꡬ쑰둜 κ²°μ •λœλ‹€. 곡뢀가 κ³§ μ½˜ν…μΈ κ°€ 되고, κ·Έ μ½˜ν…μΈ κ°€ κ³§ λ‚˜λ₯Ό 증λͺ…ν•˜λŠ” μžμ‚°μ΄ λ˜λŠ” 이 흐름은 이미 μ‹œμž‘λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μš°λ¦¬λ„ 이제 토큰을 λ‚˜ μžμ‹ μ„ μœ„ν•΄ 써야 ν•  λ•Œλ‹€^^ #지식증λͺ… #λ‡Œμ»€λ°‹ #지식확μž₯μ±Œλ¦°μ§€ #μƒκ°μ˜μ„€κ³„λ„ #κ°œμΈλ°μ΄ν„°μ…‹ #μ§€λŠ₯ν˜•μ•„μΉ΄μ΄λΉ™ #λ””μ§€ν„Έλ‡Œκ³΅μœ  #ProofOfKnowledge #BrainCommit #KnowledgeGraph #SecondBrain #ThoughtArchitecture #PersonalDataset #LLMAugment
LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
2
196