Based on what I'm reading, I would treat MCP versions as their own contract, even when they sit on top of existing REST API versions. New tools or additive changes are probably ok in the same version, but if renaming tools, changing parameters, removing capabilities, changing auth, or altering response behavior, that should be a new MCP version so existing agents don’t break.

True, Trump has returned more Iranian money than Obama and Biden combined. True, Trump has done more to advance Iranian nuclear capabilities than Obama did.

For institutional clients with high compliance requirements, the interpretability, auditability, and traceability of all code execution are critical. Code execution must be deterministic and free of hallucinations. Integrating AI capabilities with rigorous software engineering represents a significant opportunity, particularly for serving large enterprise clients or those in highly regulated industries.

Please Iran, take out Israels nuclear capabilities. You know that they will not stop their destruction of Palestine or Lebanon Signed by: Humanity

You’re not “conservative” if you viciously smear the only president that actually destroyed Iran’s warmaking capabilities you disgusting freak.

I’m very sceptical. I’m open to bets on something like the METR graph or epoch capabilities index, or revenue of frontier labs vs small model providers, or other indicators.

Everyone needs to relax, Mythos level capabilities remain accessible in Europe.

You're so skinny you have lost all self defense capabilities 😭😭😭

Water has amazing capabilities! 😯

Told you she was a useful idiot. Ukraine used to be USSR territory. It’s Soviet-era biotechnology needed to be decommissioned. Areas were upgraded to basic public health infrastructure, and improve regional disease monitoring capabilities. She’s a fraud!

I really like this article. I think that the capabilities of a country are fully dependent on the local buying capacity and the size of the local economy. Whether physical or digital, the farther away you have to distribute something, the more expensive it is. Local distribution is always much easier but if local buying power is low then companies have to export which carries a bigger distribution cost because you have to compete against locals in other countries who have a much lower distribution cost. Actually it’s not just distribution: it’s everything from consumer insights to feedback to key relationships that are a distance away. So if you do innovate but you have to necessarily export that innovation to make money, you’re at a disadvantage against local players. One personal example is that India has never made high quality games simply because the local purchasing power is low. If we had a lot more PCs things would be very different. China has roughly 320 million PC gamers and India is about 39 million. So on players alone, China’s PC base is roughly 8x India’s. BUT China’s PC game spend is on the order of 80–100x India’s, even though its player base is only like 8x larger. The difference mainly is monetization as Indian gamers spend much less (core ARPU has run around $0.29/month), so 39M PC players translate into very little premium game revenue. Game Science’s art director Yang Qi confirmed that nearly 70% of Wukong’s sales came from China itself. Knowing a local buying market exists justifies spending. The only way we can justify what we are spending now on UTA is because we found inroads into global markets through content otherwise this would be a money losing exercise. The other problem is that low purchasing power economies have too tiny a market for early adopters. If you built an OpenAI in India before anyone else 50% of people wouldn’t believe you and 50% of people will tell you it won’t work or doesn’t have use cases. I think you need a crackpot high purchasing power early adopter network with high failure and bullshit tolerance to make truly innovative things and also forgive crazy companies during early mistakes because history teaches us that the best companies all had v0.1s that were not very convincing to the masses. Thats why it’s critical for anyone who wants this country to succeed to first really create more jobs, more disposable income, even if that means creating the nth packaged food brand (American grocery stores still have a much wider variety of biscuit brands than India for example) or food delivery apps before they take bigger bets. Not because they need the capital themselves to try bigger bets, but so that they can diffuse more capital into the ecosystem via jobs and the rewards of equity ownership such that that cohort of people become early adopters for other innovative companies. Success comes from satisfying local market demand (sometimes like in the case of Tesla or Ford there is hidden demand and entrepreneurs need to unlock it) and rarely comes from creating something that has no local demand. After studying Chinese social media so much I have a long thesis on why they did well (bans on global social media platforms constrain desire of products to local players only who now get revenue and profit to do RnD. Think about what % of disposable income from India is being spent on global brands where the desire to buy starts on a global social media platform). Anyway people complaining about India building “easier businesses” are really not spending the mental energy to think second order. And 9/10 times this same type of person will completely ignore local innovation that is almost always happening in parallel but gets less media coverage.

This is a compelling vision. We don’t want another Rust Belt where AI hollows out our industries. It will require adaptation. Use the new tools to grow. But without allowing the behemoth AI company to grow a cage around yourself and steal the IP. I believe there are so many incredible problems we can solve, and we have only just begun to think about solving them. AI provides powerful cognitive capabilities to everyone on the planet. We just have to put in the effort to work with these tools the right way.

I guess the question is about equivalence. Has there been or would there be such action by US on vessels with Chinese or Russian crew. But then one can argue we are not Russia or China in defence or offence capabilities so should have measured our actions till we rise up.

At the start, Europe and the United States had the capabilities to fight but not the will. Ukraine had the will but not the capabilities. Now Ukraine has both and Russia is screwed.

7/ Some Companions provide Strategic Expertise, enhancing capabilities in relevant gameplay situations. Others provide Guild Favor, helping improve efficiency within the Kingdom. Every decision contributes to your long-term strategy.

As India expands its infrastructure, manufacturing, and digital capabilities, future business leaders will have unprecedented opportunities. Valuable insights from Pranav Adani could help students navigate that future.

As India expands its infrastructure, manufacturing, and digital capabilities, future business leaders will have unprecedented opportunities. Valuable insights from Pranav Adani could help students navigate that future.

The visual style is fun and engaging, and the onboarding screens do a good job showcasing the product's capabilities. Curious, have users found the AI companion character helpful for building trust, or is it mainly there to create a more approachable first impression?

This not going to happen. Its going to be a continual hill climb of agentic abilities. That hill climb will pass all human capabilities in less than 5 years for nearly every role. Let's not kid ourselves.