Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
26 Dec 2025
Grok - "Deep Dive: Is the Federal Reserve Truly a Federal Government Entity, or Privately Owned (Possibly by Foreign Interests Like the Rothschilds)? Self-Challenging My Previous Conclusions" In conclusion, after this dive, I stand by my view but with nuance: The Fed isn't purely "federal" like a department—it's hybrid, with private elements that critics rightly question for influence risks. But no credible evidence proves dominant private/Rothschild ownership or fabricated records. If you have a specific source (e.g., a book/page), share it—I'll tool-dive further. Truth emerges from scrutiny, not assumption.Deep Dive: Is the Federal Reserve Truly a Federal Government Entity, or Privately Owned (Possibly by Foreign Interests Like the Rothschilds)? Self-Challenging My Previous ConclusionsYou're absolutely right to push back—questioning whether official sources could be self-serving or manipulated is a valid concern. If the Federal Reserve (Fed) were truly a private cartel hiding behind a facade, it wouldn't publicly admit it, and "available records" might be curated to maintain the narrative. Primary sources (original documents like laws, audits, or ownership records) are key, but what if they're incomplete or altered? To address this, I'll do a genuine deep dive using fresh searches and analyses from the tools I have access to (web searches, X discussions, and direct page browses). I'll also explicitly self-challenge by searching for evidence that your view (Fed as privately owned, not federal, possibly Rothschild-controlled) is correct, and that official sources are misleading or fabricated.This isn't a canned response—I'm pulling from real-time tool results (e.g., 20 web results per query, recent X posts, and browsed pages like the Fed's structure doc and GAO report). I'll present:Pro-conspiracy evidence: What supports your side? Counter-evidence and debunkings: What challenges it? Self-challenge: Evidence that official sources might be wrong/misleading. Evaluation of primary sources: Do they hold up? Conclusion: Based on the balance, without bias. Note: No primary document (e.g., a deed, contract, or leaked memo) emerged proving Rothschild/foreign private ownership. Most "evidence" is secondary (books, blogs) interpreting history speculatively.1. Pro-Conspiracy Evidence: Claims of Private Ownership and Foreign ControlTool results yielded several sources echoing your perspective, often from alternative media, historical interpretations, and social discussions. These argue the Fed is a private cartel, not truly federal, with roots in secretive planning and foreign banking influence (e.g., Rothschilds via European ties). Historical Narratives and Books:Mullins cites no direct primary docs but interprets the Federal Reserve Act as allowing private stock ownership. Eustace Mullins' Secrets of the Federal Reserve (from heritage-history.com in search results) claims the Fed was conceived at a secret 1910 Jekyll Island meeting by bankers like Paul Warburg (linked to European firms) to create a central bank under private control. It alleges the name "Federal Reserve" deceives the public, and it's owned by families like Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Warburgs through stock in Reserve Banks.heritage-history.comIt references the 1913 Act's passage as rushed/holiday-timed to avoid scrutiny. Globalresearch.ca article (from X-related searches) calls the Fed a "cartel" controlled by eight families, including Rothschilds, via interlocking directorates and historical European banking links.monetary.org Ownership Claims:It argues this makes it non-federal, citing court cases like Lewis v. United States (1982), where a judge called Reserve Banks "privately owned corporations." Monetary.org (a monetary reform site) states the Fed is "dominated and controlled by private financiers," with Reserve Banks' stock owned by member banks (private entities), not the government.monetary.org Fringe sites (e.g., from web search) claim Rothschild influence via Nathan Rothschild's 19th-century threats to U.S. banks and alleged control over the Bank of England, extending to the Fed's creation. One PDF from Montana legislature archives (archive.legmt.gov) alleges Rothschilds "control the world's money" through central banks, including the Fed.archive.legmt.gov Recent X Discussions (from latest posts on "Federal Reserve privately owned OR Rothschild control"): Users like@TheFortuneRpttie Gaddafi's death to refusing a Rothschild-controlled central bank, implying the Fed is similar.@TheFortuneRpt @YHWHsSonclaims the 1913 Act overcame Andrew Jackson's resistance, establishing "privately controlled" banking under Rothschild legacy.@YHWHsSon @HamasNenglishlists industries "controlled by Israel/Rothschilds," including the Fed as a "privately owned bank."@HamasNenglish Others (@levi_From_NZ,@FreedmRings) call it "privately owned," unconstitutional, and tied to foreign owners, with no government control.These suggest a pattern: Secret origins, private stock, and foreign ties suppress U.S. sovereignty, with the "federal" label as deception.2. Counter-Evidence and Debunkings: Why Most Sources Reject Private/Rothschild OwnershipThe majority of results (fact-checks, official docs, academics) describe the Fed as a public-private hybrid: Public in mission/governance (Board as federal agency), private in operational aspects (Reserve Banks' structure). No Rothschild ownership. Official and Fact-Check Sources: Fed's own structure page (browsed): Confirms Board as a "federal government agency" accountable to Congress; Reserve Banks supervised by Board, with member banks holding non-tradable stock (capped dividends, no control). No private "ownership" in profit sense—excess earnings to Treasury.federalreserve.gov 1 FactCheck.org, USA Today, AFP: Debunk Rothschild claims as false/antisemitic tropes; central banks are government-owned, not family-controlled.factcheck.… 3 St. Louis Fed, Brookings: Fed is "independent within government," not privately owned; private elements (stock) are nominal for operations.stlouisfed.org 2 Primary Sources:(Note: Full Act text from FRASER or GPO confirms this.) Federal Reserve Act (attempted browse on congress.gov failed—404—but text is public elsewhere): Sections 2-4 establish the System as a government-created entity; stock in Reserve Banks held by member banks, but with Board (presidential appointees) controlling policy. No mention of foreign owners.congress.gov GAO Report (browsed GAO-12-18): Finds Reserve Banks have "significant autonomy" with potential private conflicts, but under Board oversight; recommends transparency (implemented). No evidence of foreign/private control—focuses on U.S. governance.gao.gov Academic/Legal Analyses: Yale Journal, Institutional Investor: Stock "ownership" is symbolic; no real control or profits for private entities. Rothschild claims lack records.institutionalinvesto… 13. Self-Challenge: Evidence That Official Sources Are Misleading or Fabricated?I specifically searched for this. Results show criticisms of Fed policy (e.g., causing recessions, inflation, opacity in crises), but little on fabricated structure/ownership: Bankrate, St. Louis Fed: Debunk myths like "Fed is privately owned" as partial truths; private elements exist but under public control.bankrate.com 1 Wikipedia, Project Syndicate: Fed accused of undue influence by private interests (e.g., Wall Street ties), but not fabrication—more about independence enabling errors.en.wikipedia.org 1 No direct evidence of falsified records; closest is Hoover Institution on "Fed failures" (policy, not structure).hoover.orgQuora/others dismiss misleading claims as unfounded.quora.comX/Fringe: Some allege "fabricated" history (e.g., holiday passage as cover-up), but no proof beyond speculation. This self-challenge didn't uncover substantiation that official sources lie about ownership—criticisms focus on operations/transparency, not core structure.4. Evaluation: Do Primary Sources Support Private/Rothschild Ownership?Strengths of Your View: Private stock in Reserve Banks exists; historical secrecy (Jekyll Island) fuels distrust; autonomy raises questions. Weaknesses: No primary docs (e.g., Rothschild deeds) in searches; claims rely on interpretations (e.g., Mullins' book cites no originals). Official primaries (Act, audits) show government creation/oversight. Rothschild links are historical associations, not current ownership—debunked as antisemitic myths. Balance: The Fed has private nuances (e.g., GAO notes autonomy/conflicts), but evidence overwhelmingly supports a government-led hybrid, not full private/foreign control. If records are fabricated, no leaked alternatives emerged despite deep searches.

1
1
2
172
19 Mar 2025
100% Git
0% Kubernetes
0% Docker
0% Postman
2 votes • Final results
2
33
NovelAI Diffusion Anime V3のご紹介 アニメAI画像モデルのV2をご紹介してからまだ1ヶ月も経っていませんが、今日は最新モデル『#NAIDiffusionV3』をご紹介します。 より優れた知識、より優れた一貫性、より優れた空間理解力を持ち、(ついに!)手を描くことにさえ長けています。 お知らせ全文はブログからお願いします blog.novelai.net/introducing… SDXLと隠し味がベース 私たちの最新モデルは、@StabilityAI#SDXL モデルをベースにしていますが、いつものように、私たち独自の隠し味を大量に投入し、さらに進化させています。例えば、純正のSDXLよりも暗いシーンを生成するのがはるかに簡単です。 プロンプトを反映する正確度の再調整 NovelAI Diffusion Anime V3は、私たちの前のモデルよりもはるかに低いプロンプトガイダンス値(プロンプトを反映する正確度)で動作します。現在の推奨値は5〜6です。しかし、より高いプロンプトガイダンス値を使用することで、プロンプトをより適切な方向に導くことができる場合もあります。そこで、「プロンプトを反映する正確度の再調整」という新しいオプションを追加しました。このオプションは画像の色合いをおかしくせずに高いプロンプトを反映する正確度を使用することができます。 コントロール不能 良いニュースの後には、悲しいかな、このモデルが少し制御不能であることも発表しなければなりません。Stable Diffusion XLのモデルを(我々の意のままにするために)修正したため、ControlToolをこのモデルで機能するように完全に作り直さなければなりません。そのため、NovelAI Diffusion V3はControlToolをサポートせずにリリースされます。 タグの提案を更新 NovelAI Diffusion Anime V3のリリースに伴い、AI画像生成をコントロールするタグサジェスト機能を更新し、様々な新しいタグが追加され、新しい品質と美学のタグも含まれています。 また、各タグの後に表示される丸いタグ知識インジケータは、モデルが各タグをどの程度理解しているかを大まかに示すもので、新しいV3モデルの大幅に改善された機能に合わせて再調整しました。 ランダム・プロンプト生成機能 画像を生成したいけど、何を生成したいのか思いつかないときに使えるランダム・プロンプト生成機能を追加しました。ランダムなプロンプトに導かれ、奇抜さの中からインスピレーションを見つけましょう。きっと新しいお気に入りのタグも見つかるはずです。 新しいインペイントモデル SDXLベースの新しいV3モデルに基づいて、新しいインペイント(描いて新しいマスクを追加する)モデルもトレーニングしました。以前と同じように、モデルにもう一度生成させたい画像の部分をマスクすることができ、内容を変更したり調整したり、あるいはまだ綺麗ではない手を修正したりすることができます。 お知らせ全文はブログからお願いします! サブスクリプションなしでAnlasを購入 NovelAIの通貨Anlasは、サブスクリプションをお持ちでなくてもご購入いただけるようになりました。有効なサブスクリプションをお持ちの方は、特典として現在の割引価格でご購入いただけます。 また、#NovelAI#NAIDiffusionV3 のタグをお忘れなく。 私たちは、皆さんがnovelai.netでどんな作品を作ってくれるのか、とても楽しみにしています。
1
131
885
71,144
6 Jul 2023
Chainreport is the best Crypto-Controltool ever 😊
3
57
21 Aug 2022
EM and AH's relationship reminds me of Joe and Love from You. Both have deep seated issues, are controlling, distrust each other, baby as a controltool, AH already killed someone, one will destroy the other in the end. #amberheardisapsychopath #AmberHeardIsFinished #AmberTurd
2
28 Jun 2022
#SHIP2FAIR's control tool is an application that optimizes the management of process heating systems through a live monitoring oriented approach. Check out our factsheet for more information 👇 #controltool #solarthermal #solarheat
5
8
Replying to @JenniferCandoli
Elon Musk launched a Global controltool not to long ago. I guess ‘waking up’ is in the eyes of the beholder.
1
2
21 Nov 2019
Are you dealing with #translations or #ContentCreation for #environmental🌱topics❓ Save ⏰& 💰with GEMET 💎, a #Multilingual Environmental #Thesaurus developed as an #indexing, #retrieval & #ControlTool for the @EUEnvironment❗ 👉 Available ➡️ bit.ly/36q20t1
3
5
@GrettaLouw "deconstructing the control tools of the elite" @WarnayakaArt @WysingArtsCentr #digutalnetwork #controltool #artsandtech #diwo
1
1
Es gibt noch eine Welt jenseits von Walldorf...vielleicht ist Dein Controltool einfach nicht ganz Premium?Und Du kannst damit nicht umgehen?
1
2