Relying solely on SSO for government services introduces a single point of failure, making the entire system vulnerable if that one point is compromised.
Globally, many nations recognize this risk. For example, the UK’s
GOV.UK Verify allows for multiple certified companies to verify one’s identity. In Australia, the myGov system is one of several ways to access government services. Meanwhile, Canada’s GCKey and Sign-In Partners coexist, offering users options.
While CloudFlare’s CDN services may have certain affiliations, it’s essential to distinguish between a CDN provider and the core identity & access management system. Decisions should be based on technical merits and ensuring multiple access avenues, rather than speculated affiliations. Diversification reduces risk.
#CyberSecurityFirst
why does people need to have an alternative way than sso service for government? what exactly is your issue with efaas ? all government services house CloudFlare as cdn services and they are more tightly linked with Israel than the liveliness provider.