Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
琴梨 なつき retweeted
2026年6月27日(土) 【Devote】 会場▶︎GOTANDA G3 OPEN 11:30 START 12:00   🎫 前方3000円 一般2000円  当日 1000円(各+1D代) t-dv.com/0627g3 💃🏻13:20~13:40 🤝🏻14:00~15:10 予約特典🎁 サイン無しチェキ1枚&ポイント+1 #アポロスター
1
1
11
That Jessie Chick 🐨 Baron Ext. 🇺🇸Cousin retweeted
Noooooo. Not a cult at all. How dare you not devote your entire platform and your life to defending Aidan Kearney. How dare you have a life outside of Aidan Kearney and the decisions he’s made for himself. How dare you talk about anything else other than Aidan’s charges that he brought on himself? And if you don’t devote your channel, your platform, and your life to Aidan Kearney, you are dead to him. But no. That’s not a cult at all. Excuse me while I go nurse my TBDS and actually live MY life. Turtleboy is the only one responsible for his behaviors. Not only does he want you to pay for his attorneys, he wants you to do the work for him. Don’t bother Aidan. You’re guilty. You’re going to prison and there’s no amount of threats you can make to anyone that will change that. You’re scum. Pure scum. How dare anyone have a platform on YouTube if you’re not talking about Aidan Kearney. He’s such a fucking joke. Personally, I will celebrate when he’s led away in those shackles and the world can be free of him.
17
8
60
3,548
Replying to @scottygb @irgarner
Should have gone with "Devote more time to hacking NORAD, CIA and NSA. Oh and Mossad"
14
Replying to @TPrincato
Trust me, if that happened Jews would build up NJ and not devote generations to murdering new yorkers.
1
4
琴梨 なつき retweeted
🎤ライブ出演情報🎤 2026/6/27 (土) 【Devote】 📍 五反田G3 ⏰ 開場11:30 開演12:00   🎫 前方3000円 一般2000円  当日 1000円(各1D別) t-dv.com/0627g3 ApolloStarの出演は13:20〜 入場特典→サイン無しチェキ1枚+ポイント1 #アポロスター
1
1
42
♡AmeliaDoll♡ retweeted
To which part of your body will you devote more of your attention: - butt - nipples - my pussy😉👇
8
141
102
1,878
You act as though the two concepts are distinct when they are inextricably intertwined. Pride exists because people sought acceptance, inclusion, and the ability to belong without being treated as lesser. Those aren't separate ideas. They're the same conversation. What I find particularly odd is the implication that someone else's inclusion somehow diminishes your rights. I am old enough to remember when Republicans championed individual liberty and the principle that people should be left alone to live their lives. Yet here you are advancing the very premise conservatives once criticized: the notion that recognizing another person's rights, identity, or place in society somehow comes at your expense. It does not. Their sense of belonging is directly tied to their ability to participate in society as equals. Whether the language surrounding Pride has broadened over time has no impact on your rights whatsoever. The only way to portray it as a threat is to convince people that acceptance is a zero-sum game, where recognition for one group necessarily comes at the expense of another. That premise is logically false. (So much for "the arguments cannot be broken.") Someone else's seat at the table does not take away yours. Someone else's dignity does not diminish yours. Someone else's freedom does not restrict yours. More fundamentally, why do you care how they define Pride today versus how it was defined decades ago? If your guiding principle is individual liberty, the answer should be simple. Communities are free to define themselves, their traditions, and their values as they see fit. You are under no obligation to participate. If, however, the objective is to police how others express themselves, organize, or identify, then your commentary becomes the strongest argument for why broader concepts of inclusion and solidarity continue to resonate. When influential commentators devote their platforms to portraying another group's acceptance as a cultural threat, they demonstrate exactly why many people feel the need to build larger coalitions around belonging and mutual support. In that sense, your criticism answers its own question. The reason Pride evolved beyond a single word is because equality is about more than legal rights. It is also about whether people are welcomed as full participants in society. And if your audience needs to be convinced that another person's inclusion somehow comes at their expense, then this conversation does more to justify broadening the movement than any Pride organizer ever could.
5
Natasha Asanté retweeted
I am convinced that as a woman, the less time you devote to men, the more beautiful, intelligent, and creative you become.
143
938
9,459
Evalan Varanger retweeted
7 Sep 2025
“I am willing to devote my body and all control. What? I can never get any release? No! Can I change my mind?”
1
147
984
26,169
Replying to @KurtSchlichter
There comes a time in medical school when the student decides what specialty they are going to devote their studies and future on. I'm still a little surprised there are med students who choose this one...
19
ioanna 🦌 retweeted
just remembered that no matter who comes and goes in their lives, buck and eddie will probably never love, trust or devote themselves to anyone the way they do to each other and smiled BIG
6
62
1,204
Zámknuty otrok retweeted
Would you devote yourself more to my toes or my soles?❤️😌 @rt_feet @RTLoveFeet @SolesBest @Tweety_Feet @FootFetishOnly_ @rt_domm @rtfindom
16
22
320
2,768
There comes a time in medical school when the student decides what specialty they are going to devote their studies and future on. I'm still a little surprised there are med students who choose this one...
2