Like more & more voters I have no faith in the system & do not encourage administration of the Scottish Executive. Especially as there's no strategy to abandon Devolution. A mug's game played by mugs!

Keep telling yourself that & see where it gets you. Every vote is participation in propping up the Scotland Act & Devolution. SNP is fully committed to the above. Congratulations.

Tell me how it’s devolution? When a white person mates with a physically more superior race?

Like more and voters I have no faith in the system and do not encourage administration of the Scottish Executive. Especially as there's no strategy to abandon Devolution. A mug's game played by mugs!

She doesn't encourage racial devolution however.

I fear it is devolution

Rule of Law and Devolution ✔️

I would be willing to bet we are witnessing devolution in real time..

How much have you received since devolution?

You think that is bad, take a read of this, My investigation into the states corruption. Quick read edition. I warn you it's long.. Document Title: The Web of Constitutional Breach: Lawful Grounds for Dissolution of Parliament and Restoration of Sovereignty by the People of the Realm Purpose: To present an unassailable legal case documenting constitutional breaches by the UK Government and Crown since 1997, each breach constituting a violation of foundational statutes, common law, or constitutional conventions. These breaches collectively justify the lawful dissolution of Parliament and the reassertion of sovereignty by the People, with precise remedies grounded in law and precedent. CENTRAL BREACH (THE SPIDER): The UK Government, in collusion with the Crown, has systematically violated its fiduciary duty to the People, acting as a corporate entity contrary to the constitutional framework established by Magna Carta 1215, the Bill of Rights 1689, and common law principles. Strand 1: Breach of the Coronation Oath Act 1688 Breach: King Charles III’s public statements declaring himself “Defender of Faiths” contravene the Coronation Oath Act 1688, which mandates the monarch to “maintain the Laws of God, the true Profession of the Gospel, and the Protestant Reformed Religion established by Law.” This undermines the statutory requirement of Protestant supremacy. Evidence: BBC interviews, 2015 speech to faith leaders. Remedy: Monarch to publicly reaffirm the oath; Joint Committee investigation with power to suspend royal assent. Counterargument Rebuttal: The oath is a legal obligation, not symbolic. Strand 2: Breach of the Act of Settlement 1701 Breach: Monarch’s public endorsements of non-Protestant faiths violate the Act’s guarantee of Protestant succession. Evidence: Official transcripts and video evidence. Remedy: Constitutional commission to assess compliance; succession proceedings if breached. Counterargument Rebuttal: Public role is constitutionally binding, not personal opinion. Strand 3: Breach of the Bill of Rights 1689 (Article 1) Breach: HRA 1998 allows courts to suspend statutes via declarations of incompatibility, violating Article 1. Evidence: R (Nicklinson) v. Ministry of Justice [2014]. Remedy: Amend HRA to remove such powers. Counterargument Rebuttal: Article 1 prohibits any suspension, direct or indirect. Strand 4: Breach of the Bill of Rights 1689 (Article 4) Breach: Party whips and media bias undermine “free” elections. Evidence: Hansard records; Ofcom bias reports. Remedy: Abolish party whips; guarantee equal media access for independents. Strand 5: Breach of Magna Carta 1215 (Clause 39) Breach: Arrests for peaceful protest deny right to jury trial. Evidence: Public Order Act 2023 arrests; DPP v. Ziegler [2021]. Remedy: Repeal restrictive protest laws; restore jury trials. Strand 6: Breach of Magna Carta 1215 (Clause 40) Breach: Legal aid cuts and secret family courts deny justice. Evidence: MoJ data; 2023 transparency reviews. Remedy: Restore legal aid; ban secret hearings except in national security cases. Strand 7: Breach of Common Law Principles Breach: Statute prioritised over equity undermines constitutional balance. Evidence: Judicial training records. Remedy: Mandate common law training; prioritise equity. Strand 8: Breach of the House of Lords Act 1999 Breach: Removal of hereditary peers weakened scrutiny. Evidence: Voting alignment data. Remedy: Reinstate hereditary peers or create independent council. Strand 9: Breach of Ministerial Code Breach: Unpunished violations erode accountability. Evidence: COVID-19 Inquiry, Hansard. Remedy: Put Ministerial Code into statute with enforcement powers. Strand 10: Corporate Usurpation of Governance Breach: Public bodies registered as corporations breach constitutional status. Evidence: Companies House filings. Remedy: Deregister constitutional offices. Strand 11: Subordination to Foreign Powers Breach: Compliance with UN, WHO, ECHR overrides sovereignty. Evidence: WHO pandemic treaty talks. Remedy: Require parliamentary supermajority for sovereignty-impacting treaties. Strand 12: Breach of Separation of Powers Breach: Whip system destroys legislative independence. Evidence: Hansard records. Remedy: Abolish whips for constitutional matters. Strand 13: Abuse of Statutory Instruments Breach: Major policy by secondary legislation bypasses scrutiny. Evidence: SI volume statistics. Remedy: Require primary legislation for rights-impacting measures. Strand 14: Public Order and Censorship Legislation Breach: Public Order Act suppresses dissent. Evidence: Arrest data 2023–2025. Remedy: Repeal provisions; protect protest rights. Strand 15: Breach of Parliamentary Due Process Breach: Bills passed without full readings. Evidence: Hansard records. Remedy: Mandatory three readings and public consultation. Strand 16: Misuse of the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 Breach: PM controls dissolution, removing public power. Remedy: Citizen-triggered dissolution via petition. Strand 17: Unlawful Taxation Breach: Spending without direct consent breaches Bill of Rights. Remedy: Public referendums for major expenditure. Strand 18: Breach of Crown’s Fiduciary Duty Breach: Royal silence on breaches violates duty. Remedy: Public reaffirmation of duty; suspend prerogatives if non-compliant. Strand 19: Misprision of Treason Breach: Officials ignore breaches, aiding treason. Remedy: Legal notices and tribunals. Strand 20: Suppression of Remedy Breach: Censorship and arrests obstruct redress. Remedy: Judicial inquiry; protect remedies. Strand 21: Unlawful Recognition of Foreign States Breach: Recognising Palestine without parliamentary vote exceeds powers. Remedy: Supermajority requirement. Strand 22: Betrayal via Immigration and Veteran Neglect Breach: Mass immigration from hostile states while neglecting veterans. Remedy: Inquiry; legislate veteran priority. Strand 23: Institutional Betrayal of Children Breach: Systemic neglect and cover-up of abuse breaches safeguarding laws and international duties. Evidence: Jay Report, IICSA, Telford Inquiry, Knowl View. Remedy: Independent Safeguarding Commission; prosecutions; transparency mandate. Strand 24: COVID PPE “VIP Lane” Unlawful Procurement Breach: High Court found preferential PPE contracts for political contacts unlawful. Evidence: Good Law Project v. SoS for Health, 2022. Remedy: Reform procurement law; criminal investigations. Strand 25: PPE Medpro / Baroness Mone Fraud Allegations Breach: Concealed financial interest; unsafe PPE; misuse of public office. Evidence: High Court filings; Hansard admissions. Remedy: Prosecution for fraud and misfeasance. Strand 26: Post Office Horizon IT Scandal Breach: Wrongful prosecutions despite known IT flaws. Evidence: Bates v. Post Office Ltd; Inquiry reports. Remedy: Criminal accountability; compensation. Strand 27: Owen Paterson / Randox Lobbying Scandal Breach: Breach of lobbying ban; £500m COVID contracts without competition. Remedy: Strengthen lobbying rules; annul contracts obtained unlawfully. Strand 28: Unlawful Surveillance of Journalists Breach: IPT found Met Police and PSNI unlawfully spied on journalists. Remedy: Criminal penalties; strengthen source protection. Strand 29: Met Police Institutional Corruption (Daniel Morgan Case) Breach: Decades-long obstruction in murder investigation. Remedy: Independent anti-corruption unit with prosecutorial powers. Strand 30: Tower Hamlets Councillors – Foreign Influence in Governance Breach: Councillors alleged to have acted under foreign allegiance or influence, contrary to the Bill of Rights 1689 which forbids “any foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate” from having jurisdiction or authority within the realm. Such conduct undermines the Act of Settlement 1701 which secures the liberties of the subject against foreign power, and may amount to misfeasance in public office or even high treason if allegiance to a foreign power is established. Evidence: Bill of Rights 1689; Act of Settlement 1701; Treason Act 1351; National Security Act 2023 (FIRS registration requirements). Remedy: Suspension and investigation of councillors; nullification of unlawful decisions; application of treason and security statutes; establishment of parliamentary commission to prevent foreign infiltration. Counterargument Rebuttal: Personal faith or heritage does not breach the Constitution. The breach arises only where allegiance, funding, or instruction is sourced from a foreign power. Concealment of such influence is both unconstitutional and criminal. Strand 31: Denial of English Parliamentary Representation Breach: England is uniquely denied its own Parliament, while Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland possess devolved legislatures. This violates Magna Carta 1215 (Clauses 39–40), Bill of Rights 1689 (Articles 1 and 13), Act of Settlement 1701, Acts of Union 1707 and 1800, and the common law principle of equality before the law. The “West Lothian Question” demonstrates that English citizens are subjected to decisions by MPs from devolved nations on matters that apply only to England, stripping them of equal constitutional representation. Evidence: Devolution Acts 1998; Hansard debates acknowledging the “West Lothian Question”; voting records showing MPs from devolved nations legislating on England-only issues. Remedy: Establish an English Parliament with devolved powers equal to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, or dissolve Westminster for breach of constitutional settlement. Petitions, affidavits, and judicial review to be filed as lawful remedy. Counterargument Rebuttal: Political convenience does not override constitutional equality. The union was conditional on equal treatment — denial of an English Parliament fractures the settlement in law. Conclusion and Lawful Demand: The above breaches, substantiated by statute, precedent, and evidence, demonstrate a deliberate dismantling of the UK’s constitutional order. We, the People of the Realm, hereby issue this affidavit of objection, placing the Crown and Parliament on notice of constitutional collapse. We demand: Immediate dissolution of Parliament via lawful mechanism under common law. Suspension of the monarch’s legislative prerogatives until compliance with statutory duties. A public audit and restoration of constitutional order under Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, and common law. Signed: Maximilian-rex Cromwell

Devolution Power Hour Ep. 466: Biolab Disclosure, AI Export Ban, and Ira... youtube.com/live/Om0Vf7dNEZQ… via @YouTube

England now has Strategic Authorities under the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026 (no legislative power but 9 Executive competences) as well as a set multi year budget and the ability for more competences to be devolved and changes made using SI’s

So shall we ask the Scots and Welsh to have another devolution referendum

Union Finance Minister @nsitharaman addresses the Viksit Bharat Sankalpa Samavesha in #Bengaluru. She informs that #Karnataka has received five times more #Centraltax devolution as against the allocation during the UPA tenure.

Rupert Lowe wants to shut down the Scottish Parliament, the Senedd and the Northern Ireland assembly. What could possibly go wrong with shutting down Northern Ireland's devolution. 🤔

Union Finance Minister @nsitharaman addresses the Viksit Bharat Sankalpa Samavesha in #Bengaluru. She informs that #Karnataka has received five times more #Centraltax devolution as against the allocation during the UPA tenure.

3/5 Why does this matter? ✅ It deepens devolution. ✅ It promotes equity in resource distribution. ✅ It strengthens our local democracy. ✅ It speeds up service delivery for all. When local councils thrive, our nation thrives.

🚨 FM Nirmala Sitharaman slams Karnataka Congress narrative! “Numbers don’t lie! Karnataka is getting 76% more central funds in just one year than the entire 10-year UPA period. Timely tax devolution massive grants under Modi govt show true cooperative federalism.” Sitharaman counters state complaints with hard facts at Bengaluru event. #NirmalaSitharaman #Karnataka #CentralFunds #CooperativeFederalism #ModiGovt #IndianEconomy #BJP #Congress #NewsUpdate

As devolution reshapes local decision-making across England, @Sport_England is urging leaders to embed physical activity into plans for healthier, more connected and economically resilient communities. Partner content

YES Prof. Kivutha Kibwana stands out as the only Governor since devolution with no corruption cases involving public resources in Makueni. Prof's clean record, integrity, and citizen-focused governance offer a strong model. True progress depends on building strong, equitable institutions for all wananchi. ^MP 🎗️ 🇰🇪