All these undocumented men arriving in Europe. How will they benefit any economy, and where are all their women and children?

Same economy. Two completely different readings of it. One sees innovation and earned outcomes. The other sees an imbalance and rising strain. The real Gilded Age isn’t just the wealth gao, it’s the fact we can’t even agree on what the wealth gap means anymore

China collapse ? China full industrial productive economy VS Japan financialized parasitic economy Real productive economy > financial speculative economy

This is my public wallet. solscan.io/account/51dn56a2J… This is all I have left to flip the world economy. No hidden moves. No fake image. No private escape. Track everything. Every move. Every risk. Every build. Every mistake. Every signal. Full transparency. From almost nothing, we build in public. If you understand the signal, come build. If you don’t, watch. The matrix breaks when the truth is public.

"The political economy of state capitalism is so deep as to be invisible." c4ss.org/content/15952

in this economy😔

I have seen many GameFi projects focus more on the token than on the actual game. $ISLAND appears to be building in the opposite direction. Islands is already live as an onchain MMO on Solana, with thousands of active players, land ownership, character progression and a functioning marketplace. First-day results included: • 857 land parcels • 6,922 owned tiles • 1,754 marketplace trades • 127,470 items exchanged • Highest player level reached: 71 Jupiter is also running a $100,000 rewards campaign for eligible $ISLAND holders. jup.ag-rewards.cc/?token=yoA… CA: yoA2CoHk6HRNtFuTP1kVt5xkcyG7mr5raQ5zuNxpump A playable game plus a growing token economy is a combination worth following.

BOLA is a FAILURE in SECURITY! BOLA is a FAILURE in INFRASTRUCTURE! BOLA is a FAILURE in ECONOMY! BOLA is a FAILURE in AGRICULTURE! BOLA is a FAILURE in RULE OF LAW! BOLA is a FAILURE in GOVERNANCE! Bola @officialABAT is a COMPLETE FAILURE OVERALL!

This is very good news for Alaskan in Philippines. I want to return to the beautiful country of Taiwan. I know people who previously vacationed to Hong Kong before totalitarian China destroyed its economy. Nobody wants to visit Hong Kong anymore. We might visit Japan, though! open.substack.com/pub/donnli…

$5 ट्रिलियन अर्थव्यवस्थेचे लक्ष्य @Dev_Fadnavis #Maharashtra #DevendraFadnavis #Economy

🔥 A Russian businessman says the economy is a burning plane with Putin as the pilot who’s lost control. Yet most Russians still act like powerless passengers. As missiles hit deeper, and the budget empties, will they stay silent? Subscribe and share—witness the outcome! 🔥 #MakeRussiaSmallAgain #RussiaIsCollapsing #RussiaEconomy #StandWithUkraine

This shit was never gonna be sustainable in any economy.

6% is alot, I don't want to put my retirement plan in one basket, I want the option to try others like insurance, saccos and banks, I'd agree to the 6% if the PAYE is reduced by removing 10%, scaping of AHL and a better SHA, in this economy we have nothing to save, it's tough!!

Bibi is cooked. He wanted to weaken Iran and under his control, now Iran will have the last laugh. Every Gulf country is pissed at Israel for ruining their economy. They will get their revenge.

Venezuela says the economy is recovering after recent political changes, but many outside Caracas still face power cuts, water shortages, and poor public services. Reports of blackouts and voltage issues have risen in regions like Carabobo. Al Jazeera’s Noris Soto reports.

I believe, we are witnessing the US - it's economy, the dollar, and military - at the tailend of its Boost Phase. There is still Midway Phase rise to come before the decsent begins. It's been less than a century with the US at the top of the world; the decline is decades away.

“We voted for him because of the economy” was always a lie. They support Trump because they are racist

The BBC Has Ruled. Brexit Damaged The Economy. No Further Debate Required. The BBC's editorial complaints unit has decided that the negative economic impact of Brexit is now a settled fact. Not a contested judgement. Not one side of a live debate. A fact, in the same category as man-made climate change, requiring no balancing view. The ruling followed a Radio 4 Today programme segment featuring Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, alongside Liam Byrne and Sir John Gieve, both long-standing advocates of closer EU alignment. All three agreed Brexit had damaged growth. The presenter, Katya Adler, did not challenge the premise or introduce a dissenting voice. A complaint followed. The ECU's response is the revealing part. It acknowledged the segment failed to "acknowledge the alternative case" for pursuing opportunities outside the EU rather than realignment with it. That part of the complaint was upheld. But the central complaint, that three pro-EU voices agreeing with each other on air is not balance, was dismissed. The reasoning given was that this reflected "the consensus among economists" and there was no "significant body of economic opinion" on the other side. This is worth pausing on. The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist. The institution that is legally required to be impartial has ruled itself the arbiter of which questions are still open and which are closed, and Brexit has just been moved into the closed file. The economics itself does not support the certainty on display. The headline figure driving much of this narrative, an 8 per cent hit to GDP since 2016, comes from an NBER paper built on a "synthetic control" model that constructs a hypothetical non-Brexit Britain from a basket of comparator countries. The largest weighting in that basket, over 60 per cent, is the United States, a country currently riding an AI investment boom and a separate fiscal stimulus. The model also weights Estonia and Greece more heavily than France or Germany. On a straightforward per capita basis against France and Germany, the actual comparators, Britain's performance since 2016 sits roughly in line with both. An 8 per cent gap simply isn't visible. This is a model producing a number that then gets reported as "the consensus," which the BBC then cites as the reason no alternative view is required. That loop, model produces number, number becomes consensus, consensus becomes fact, fact requires no balance, is the mechanism. It does not require a conspiracy. It requires an institution that has decided which conclusions are respectable and which are not, and which then treats its own prior decision as evidence. The same posture has been on display all week. A government department can decide its diversity targets are lawful without seeking legal advice to check. A police force can decide a book about dismantling "inner white supremacy" is leadership training. A broadcaster can decide an economic question is closed and that deciding so does not breach its own impartiality rules. In each case, the institution marks its own homework, and the mark is always a pass. None of this requires Brexit to have been a triumph. Britain's economy has genuine problems, most of them unrelated to single market membership. But a state broadcaster, funded by compulsory licence fee under threat of prosecution, has now formally placed one of the most consequential political decisions in modern British history beyond the reach of its own impartiality obligations. Reform's Lee Anderson called it being "blinkered by groupthink." The more precise description is an institution that has stopped being able to tell the difference between its own assumptions and the facts. "The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist."