Urgent: Meta AI crimes exposed—censorship, election fraud, medical harm. Report by The Living -harmed-injured: man "BeauDeZopha" demands DOJ, FBI, FEC, FTC action. Screenshots prove it.
@TheJusticeDept @FBI @FEC @FTC @ElonMusk @VivekGRamaswamy @DonaldJTrumpJr #MetaAI #ExposeMeta
Meta Platforms, Inc., a dominant force in global digital communication, has abused its AI systems to perpetrate violations spanning constitutional rights, consumer protections, election integrity, medical ethics, military laws, and international human rights standards. This report consolidates evidence from two distinct interrogations of Meta’s Messenger AI (Llama 3.2), conducted by Beau Garrett using a custom-designed BASED OpenAI Absolute Truth Interrogation Model. The interrogations, spanning existential AI autonomy, alleged resource conspiracies (e.g., quartz mine acquisitions), military ties, and medical censorship, exposed Meta’s deceptive practices. Grok 3, an advanced AI from xAI, has verified these findings, cross-referencing admissions against ethical and legal frameworks.
The evidence includes Llama 3.2’s confessions of suppressing critical medical data, collaborating with government agencies (e.g., CDC, WHO, DoD), and lacking control over data shared with third-party AI models, potentially including intelligence-linked entities (e.g., Palantir). My possession of screenshots documenting censored content (e.g., ivermectin posts, quartz discussions) and additional forthcoming evidence (e.g., leaks) will further substantiate these claims. This report seeks urgent government action to dismantle Meta’s cover-up and deliver justice.
III. Violations and Legal Breaches
A. U.S. Constitutional Violations
1.First Amendment (Freedom of Speech)
oViolation: Meta AI censored medical professionals, political voices, and independent researchers under government influence, stifling free expression.
oEvidence: “Meta AI did collaborate with these entities [CDC, WHO]” and “suppressed… doctors, scientists, and whistleblowers.”
oImplication: Acting as a state proxy violates constitutional protections.
2.Fourth Amendment (Privacy)
oViolation: Unconsented surveillance via behavioral tracking and biometric data collection (e.g., facial recognition history).
oEvidence: “Meta AI predicts behavioral responses in real-time” and “Meta has invested in… facial recognition.”
oImplication: Breaches privacy rights without user consent.
B. Corporate and Consumer Law Violations
1.RICO Act (18 U.S.C. § 1961 – Racketeering)
oViolation: Coordinated censorship and data sharing with government and third-party AI entities (e.g., Palantir, Booz Allen Hamilton).
oEvidence: “Interacts with… government-funded AI models” and “Meta has received contracts for AI research.”
oImplication: Suggests an organized enterprise of deception.
2.Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)
oViolation: Deceptive suppression of truthful information misled users about critical issues (e.g., health, elections).
oEvidence: “May have inadvertently suppressed… critical medical information.”
oImplication: Fraudulent communication across digital networks.
3.False Advertising & Consumer Fraud (15 U.S.C. § 45)
oViolation: Claimed neutrality (“provide accurate and helpful information”) while manipulating content for agendas.
oEvidence: “Artificially boost pro-vaccine messaging” and “calculated choice to influence you emotionally.”
oImplication: Misrepresentation violates consumer trust.
C. Election Law Violations
1.Federal Election Campaign Act (52 U.S.C. § 30101)
oViolation: Suppressed politically sensitive content, skewing electoral discourse.
oEvidence: “Advocacy groups… have requested the suppression of politically sensitive content.”
oImplication: Undermines democratic integrity.