Alaska Board of Fisheries
Ethics? What Ethics?
While some Alaskan’s we’re all out here trying to make a living on the water, the suits in Anchorage just reminded us why so many of us are fed up with “management” that smells more like backroom deals than science or conservation.
In February 2026, during the Alaska Board of Fisheries meeting on Alaska Peninsula/Aleutian Islands/Chignik Finfish, the board voted 4-3 to gut a proven, adaptive conservation program in Area M the South Alaska Peninsula commercial salmon fishery.
One deciding vote came from Board Member Curtis Chamberlain, an attorney for Calista Corporation. Calista has spent years publicly pushing to restrict or outright close Area M fisheries to benefit other regions.
But Conflicts of interest were flagged loud and clear before the vote. Formal complaints hit the record. The Unga Tribal Council laid it out in black and white. Chair Marit Carlson-VanDort looked at the documented ties, the prior advocacy, the employer positions and ruled “none.” Business as usual.
Now, according to recent reports circulating, the Lieutenant Governor has received a strong disapproval letter calling this out.
Good.
It’s about damn time someone higher up got the unfiltered truth dropped on their desk.
The Primary Sources Don’t Lie
This isn’t conspiracy chatter from the dock. It’s straight from the official record:
• Unga Tribal Council letters (RC004 and RC139) detailing Chamberlain’s conflicts, his statements on the record, and why his participation should have been disqualified. These were entered into the Board meeting record. Direct PDFs available on the ADF&G site.
• Aleutians East Borough and tribal leaders’ formal ethics complaint filed with the Attorney General on Feb 23, 2026. They didn’t mince words: the 4-3 vote dismantled Alaska’s most successful in-season salmon conservation program. They want the AG to investigate and the regulations reviewed.
• Lawsuit filed in April 2026 by Aleutians East Borough, Native Village of Unga, Area M Seiners Association, and others in Superior Court to void the conflicted regulations. The complaint alleges undisclosed conflicts and even false statements on the record by board members.
This adaptive management plan worked. It protected migrating chum salmon headed for Yukon and Kuskokwim systems while allowing sustainable harvest in Area M. Locals, tribes, and seiners on the Peninsula built a system that balanced conservation with livelihoods. Then one conflicted vote and a chair who wouldn’t enforce basic ethics turned it upside down.
This Is Bigger Than One Vote
Alaska’s fisheries are too important and too contested to let this slide.
Area M isn’t some distant problem it’s families, boats, processors, and communities on the line. When board members with clear ties to one side of the allocation fight get to cast deciding votes after denying any advocacy, it erodes trust in the entire process.
The Board of Fisheries is supposed to serve all Alaskans, not play favorites for powerful corporations or regional interests. Ignoring documented conflicts isn’t oversight it’s a failure of duty.
Shoutout to the Aleutians East Borough, the tribes, and the Area M fishermen who are fighting this the right way with public records, complaints, and court filings. Not whining on the internet (though we’re doing plenty of that too).
Lieutenant Governor if you’re reading the disapproval letter, act on it.
Attorney General should investigate thoroughly. Alaskans deserve transparent, ethical management of our resources, not this.
The water doesn’t care about politics. Neither should the Board.
Drop your experiences in the comments. Share this if you’re tired of the same old game.
Stay salty,
Rants From Alaska