Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @FixedFloat
This platform is completely untrustworthy and operates like a scam. Do not be fooled by any positive reviews you see online. If you value your money and your crypto, use a legitimate and regulated exchange instead of ff.io

3
It depends.... That just it
21
Jun 13
@SpecterAnalyst, would appreciate a response
1
1
15
امشب یک والت 72 میلیون دلاری که در حال مبهم سازی منبع تترهاش از طریق FixedFloat و ChangeIO بود، مسدود شد. 🔴 املاکی هر شب قسطش کونش رو از بازار کریپتوی ایران می‌کنه ولی هم آتش بسه، هم خرج هفتگی سربازهاش در اومده، هم خون از دماغشون نیومده، هم قراره توافق کنه. زرشک!!🖕
2
49
3,941
Jonny Ji 🇻🇪 retweeted
Sabes que no hay atomic swaps en FixedFloat ni en ChangeNOW. Son exchanges. Y te van a congelar.
I flagged the attacker's address during the laundering phase, and with the support of @FixedFloat and @ChangeNOW_io, we were able to freeze $100K in stolen funds. The attacker is still holding about $3M. Stay smart.
2
1
11
1,066
Jun 12
🚨 On June 11, a suspicious $120.2M USDT transfer on Tron was traced by #ZachXBT, with over $12M sent to KuCoin, around $8M to instant exchanges, and more than $8M bridged to #Bitcoin and #Ethereum networks. Heavy Monero ( $XMR ) buying pushed the price from about $330 to as high as $420, a 27% surge, before partial retracement. Tether froze approximately $72M USDT on June 12, while roughly $48M continued moving to platforms including Binance, HTX, and FixedFloat. #Monero #USDT #Tron #Crypto
1
2
46
kataてぃんくる㌠🍥 retweeted
オンチェーン探偵、盗難資金10万ドル超を凍結 マネロン段階で阻止 ・オンチェーン探偵がマネーロンダリング段階でハッカーのアドレスを特定 ・FixedFloatおよびChangeNOWの協力により、10万ドル超の盗難仮想通貨を凍結 ・攻撃者は依然として約300万ドルの盗難資産を保有
1
4
344
🚨 JUST IN: Tether freezes 72M USDT 🧊 Per on-chain sleuth ZachXBT, Tether has blacklisted a wallet tied to the recent 120.2M USDT transfer on Tron. 🔒 Amount frozen: 72M USDT 📉 The remaining ~48M USDT reportedly moved to exchanges including: · 🔹 Binance · 🔹 HTX · 🔹 FixedFloat 🛡️ Tether's blacklisting power continues to be a double-edged sword in crypto — critical for compliance, controversial for decentralization. #Tether #USDT #TRON #ZachXBT #CryptoCrime #Blockchain
36
That’s a regulatory shortcut argument
17
sarnaz base.eth (✸,✸).ink retweeted
@FixedFloat froze my funds. The swap was never completed. The funds were never returned. After full cooperation with their compliance team and providing every document requested, I was told the funds would remain frozen. 🧵 Thread
1
2
4
59
The greatest exploiters are always the teams themselves, or they cut deals to be exploited with a predetermined split.
1
106
What concerns me most is the lack of a clear resolution process. If a customer cannot receive the swap and cannot receive a refund, what exactly is the path to recovering frozen funds? Has anyone else experienced something similar with @FixedFloat? #Crypto #FixedFloat #Bitcoin
1
1
49
0xSaiyangod retweeted
I flagged the attacker's address during the laundering phase, and with the support of @FixedFloat and @ChangeNOW_io, we were able to freeze $100K in stolen funds. The attacker is still holding about $3M. Stay smart.
24-Hour Incident Update Following our earlier communication, we want to share key, substantive findings from the first 24 hours of investigation. This is an on-going investigation. A full post-mortem will follow when these workstreams are complete. The findings below are what we can responsibly share now. Tangentially, we are aware of rumors and FUD spreading and intend to address those directly with the evidence we present in our findings. First, this is not an inside job nor is there any team involvement; implications that the team is secretly selling tokens or anything of that nature is entirely false and can be proven empirically. Second and related, we have never engaged with Web3Port. Both ongoing rumors are entirely fabricated. ✅ The Details That Are Confirmed 1️⃣ The attack was not address poisoning of our transaction-construction workflow. Our earlier assessment that address poisoning was unlikely has been confirmed by direct forensic evidence. The team member who proposed the multisig transaction (Signer 1) signed the correct recipient address 0x70ae7D3DECfB4C3aE996fb1c07092566F73D5c15 at 03:17 UTC on May 27, during the internal verification call. The signed payload is preserved verbatim in the local device logs, with the correct address and correct amount. 2️⃣ The attack was a compromise of that signer's private key. A separate valid signature — for a different transaction with the attacker's address 0x70AE678b457C5E1b3fD7AD9537F234dFc1795C15 as recipient — was submitted to the Safe Transaction Service at 04:00 UTC, 43 minutes later. That second signature is cryptographically valid for the same wallet but does not appear in the Signer 1’s local device logs. The mechanism that explains this is that the attacker had independent possession of the private key and signed the substituted transaction from outside Signer 1’s infrastructure. The remaining signers reviewed the queued transaction in the Safe interface. The attacker's address was specifically constructed to share the same first four and last four hex characters as the correct recipient — both begin with 0x70AE and end with 5C15. This vanity pattern is used to appear as the correct address in the Safe UI preview. Specifically generating these fake vanity addresses takes time and resources and implies premeditation and planning on the attacker’s end (more mention of this in point 4). Following confirmation the preview, the remaining signers signed the transaction. The on-chain execution followed at 17:59:24 UTC. 3️⃣ Funds are fully traced and currently parked on Ethereum. Within ~4 hours of execution, the attacker liquidated the stolen GUA on PancakeSwap, swept proceeds to an operational hub wallet 0xb292a7016c0008e786edca46459ccee063673afb, bridged the value to Ethereum via cross-chain protocols, and consolidated approximately 2,783.99 ETH into three cold-storage wallets that currently hold the funds with zero outflows: - 0x111b78A86C16dBD4261FCb5C7D3A9dAF25E2b589 - 0x7b8f28Ff2E1D4DF2D8ddD1daBaFf8c3E58FE841C - 0xfa4cb6add9da4a4b714541b98fd4b2e3da86b7c8 - A separate ~170,121 USDT was bridged out. 4️⃣ The attacker is using substantial, reusable infrastructure. The operational hub address and the three Ethereum cold-storage addresses are each surrounded by brute-forced lookalike "vanity twin" addresses that the attacker is seeding with fake transfer events using Unicode-spoofed token symbols (ETH, EṬH, ĖTḨ). The same vanity-address construction technique produced the address used against our project. The scale and pre-staging of this infrastructure indicates an industrialized operation rather than an opportunistic one-off attack. We will continue to publish substantive updates as the investigation progresses, while protecting information that could compromise active workstreams. We continue to work closely with authorities, white hats, and tracing services. We thank the community for its patience.
5
7
59
10,114
Only eigenwallet and BasicSwapDEX are really non-custodial :)
44