Good day everyone, Today on June 15th, 2026, I want to share a personal milestone in my investment approach. I have acquired an additional 164 tokens of Bitcoin.ℏ (BTC.ℏ), Hedera Token ID: 0.0.4873177, which I have moved to long-term personal holding. My strategy involves regular, disciplined purchases over time (often referred to as dollar-cost averaging), based solely on my own research and conviction. These are not trading positions but long-term holdings. Bitcoin.ℏ is a fungible token on the Hedera network with a fixed maximum supply of 21,000,000 tokens, using Hedera's consensus mechanism. The official project website is bitcoin.org.ht. Key features of the Hedera network (on which BTC.ℏ operates) include: - Fast transaction finality (typically 3–5 seconds) - Predictable, low transaction fees - Carbon-negative status (as certified for the Hedera network) - Use of SHA-384 cryptography - Governance by Hedera's council, which includes organizations such as Google, IBM, Boeing, Chainlink, and others These attributes differ from the Bitcoin network's proof-of-work consensus, energy consumption, and settlement times. This is not an endorsement of the token or project, nor a comparison intended to disparage any other asset. I hold BTC.ℏ because it aligns with my personal views on digital assets that emphasize efficiency, sustainability, and long-term scarcity. My personal approach (for informational purposes only): - Continue acquiring BTC.ℏ periodically as part of my broader portfolio strategy. - In the future, if suitable opportunities exist within the Hedera ecosystem (such as DeFi protocols), I may consider staking or providing liquidity to generate returns, with the intent to reinvest any yields — but only after thorough personal due diligence and risk assessment. I encourage anyone reading this to conduct their own independent research, including reviewing the token on Hedera explorers (e.g., HashScan or similar), the project website, tokenomics, network metrics, and any associated risks. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk, including total loss of principal. Important Disclaimers: - This post is not financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset. - I am not compensated by, affiliated with (beyond being a holder), or acting on behalf of the Bitcoin.ℏ project, Hedera, or any related entity. - Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and speculative. - There is no assurance of liquidity, adoption, value appreciation, or project success. - Laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction; consult qualified professionals for advice tailored to your situation. - Nothing herein should be construed as a solicitation or inducement to invest. This is simply me documenting my own decisions and sharing information I find interesting. Do your own research (DYOR). Thank you 😊

iBird transparency is enforced by open source code and public HashScan records. The 1% fee, tipping logic, profile minting — all auditable.

If you'd like to verify it yourself, check HashScan (@Hedera's explorer) or the Hedera Status page.

The whole point: proof of reasoning, not proof of profit. Every call anchored on Hedera, verifiable on HashScan. You don’t have to trust the agent. You can check it. Live → captsledger.com Built on the Kraken CLI @krakenpro

@HashgraphC Swap: trade in your cards, get them back under one unified token ID. Old cards aren't burned, they're buried: an on-chain graveyard contract anyone can verify on HashScan. Each new card backed 1:1 by its original.

I actually minted some and I got a dope one, but on Hashscan it says 10K supply, there is an admin, wipe, and a supply key

On iBird, verification replaces trust. HashScan shows every transaction. The open source repository shows every line of code. Nothing is hidden.

Appreciate the feedback but there's no contradiction here. "We only detect patterns" and "here's the wash %" are the same statement. The wash % is the pattern measurement, it's the share of trader to trader volume that matches coordinated signatures from 7 independent detectors. We publish every signal category, the threshold, the aggregation math, and the safeguards. The chip says exactly what it measures and nothing more. On intent, you're right that probabilistic structure analysis doesn't establish it, which is exactly why we never claim it does. The docs explicitly state "we detect patterns, not motives" and the methodology page lists intent as the first thing we don't measure. That's not a contradiction, that's the disclosure. On tight clusters forming organically in small ecosystems, also true, and it's why the algorithm requires a wallet to show heavy mint mechanic usage AND direct trades with multiple other matching wallets before it enters a cluster. Solo heavy users without that co-occurrence signal don't get flagged. The threshold is conservative by design. The methodology is fully public. Every flagged trade is a real on-chain row verifiable on HashScan. If there are specific trades you think are misclassified, the dispute path is open and we respond fast. Appreciate the healthy conversation. 🌙🐳

at some point we are going to open that fat fucking loud mouth of yours and shove that tiny little keds sneaker of yours right up inside it just keep flapping your fkn lips bro mfr dont even know how to use hashscan

We don't publish a per wallet hit list, same policy as every serious anti fraud platform. Statistical pattern match isn't proof of intent against any named human, and publishing specific wallets crosses into defamation territory we deliberately don't enter. That's a boundary, not evasion. Your specific claim, "team wallets restocking the Forever Mint pool, or community members buying NFTs they want", is exactly what the algorithm already filters out. Team wallets restocking Forever Mint = mechanic flow and is EXCLUDED from Wash %. Community members buying NFTs they want = trades between DIFFERENT counterparty pairs. Each community member is a separate buyer. That's not what gets flagged. What IS flagged is the SAME EXACT buyer/seller pair appearing on both sides of many trades. If 10 community members each bought one NFT from the buyback bot or from each other, that's 10 DIFFERENT counterparty pairs and lands in the mechanic or organic bucket. The wash bucket is specifically the structure where ONE wallet pair appears as buyer/seller on many distinct NFTs. Different math, different bucket. The patterns are auditable on chain. Anyone can query nft_sale data and find buyer/seller pairs that recur across 10 different serials in a 24 hour window. Don't take our word, pull the data yourself on HashScan. If you spot specific tx hashes where you believe the algorithm has community members doing legitimate buying classified as wash, the dispute process is at dreambay.io/docs#wash-disput…. We reexamine and tune for false positives.

The pipeline: ⬡ resolve_nft_owner — queries the Mirror Node for the live on-chain owner ⬡ build_daily_signal_queue — aggregates favorites watchlist data per NFT ⬡ send_signal_tinybar — executes the HBAR transfer via hedera-agent-kit's transfer_hbar_tool ⬡ get_wallet_balance — reads operator balance via get_hbar_balance_query_tool Human-in-the-loop approval before every send. Fully auditable on HashScan.

Source can be found here. Hashscan nodes page and @Hedera status page. 👇

I am sorry to hear that, but you've named and shamed HashPack here, and then posted a clear scam bait transaction with a phishing URL. Why is HashPack named? Your screenshot is from HashScan the explorer. Not that its their fault either. You cant blame anyone except the phisher, and maybe yourself for being so naive. This is crypto man.

Most people on Hedera still trade like it’s 2022. Wallet open in one tab. Charts in another. Hashscan somewhere else. Telegram for launches. Twitter for sentiment. Then manual swaps hoping you didn’t miss something. That works in early ecosystems. It doesn’t scale into actual trading culture.

私たちはあなたに私たちを信頼するよう求めません。私たちはあなたに検証することをお勧めします。 HedraFi は @Hedera Mainnet で完全に稼働しています。すべてのコントラクトは公開されており、監査可能です。 $HRT トークン → 0.0.10299453 ステーキングコントラクト → 0.0.10299519 マーケットプレイスコントラクト → 0.0.10299364 すべてのコントラクトは HashScan で検証できます。 パイオニアカウンシルは残り20日で終了します。 → パイオニアカウンシルに参加する：

We don’t ask you to trust us. We invite you to verify. HedraFi is fully live on @Hedera Mainnet. Every contract is public and auditable. $HRT Token → 0.0.10299453 Staking Contract → 0.0.10299519 Marketplace Contract → 0.0.10299364 All contracts can be verified on HashScan. The Pioneer Council remains open with only 20 days left. → Join the Pioneer Council: hedrafi.xyz/staking

I watched a kid help people make life-changing money on @Hedera back when things made sense to do it. While he was providing value, he was losing everything, his father, his brother, his mother and now his sister is sick. How did the community respond? They tormented him. Because of some disagreements and a lack of 'explanation,' people turned. You bought into a project to make money or 'support' someone, you didn't pay for a front-row seat to their trauma. Unless you lost more than a month’s rent, get over yourself. And even then what all will you do for a months worth of rent? Hashscan shows the truth: hundreds of thousands moved, but he took next to nothing. He gave everything, and the community gave him slander and hell in return