Subjectively seen by them as good to themselves and to others. That's commom good, shared (by all) good. Both as privates and as a community. Whole good rather. Both in common and in private: Life or no murder, food or no hunger, sheler ot no homlessness, health or no illness

I think the fundamental problem at the core of current homlessness policy in LA (CA too) is failure to enforce standards and laws. Why for example does Orange County not have the problems LA County does? Maybe they just say "not here, bro."

You dont to end homlessness because you would loose out on all your NGO kickbacks. We spent $10 billion a year on homelessness assistance and somehow that’s not enough…

And BTW, when ENDING HOMLESSNESS (And hunger!) would literally cost your Govt about THREE PENNIES worth of every tax dollar, you got a f**ked up Govt. Abt $100B, 1/10 of the Pentagon's Budget. How much is that out of the budget?...

Homlessness and POVERTY not just for him but for his Daughter wife entire entourage

I could make WorldPeace With 100 billion $ 20-End World Hunger 10-End Homlessness 50-End poverty taxes 10-End violence,racism,crime, &hate 5-free energy 5-infinite fresh water What does that say about anyone with that kind of money?

Free health care? Fuck the government, I cant help how these assholes destroy my beautiful country. But if I was incharge I would End hunger, poverty homlessness, taxes, crime Racism and violence. But that doesn't happen for another 49 years. But dont hold that on me!

IT WILL NOT LAST ANOTHER 250 YEARS UNLESS AMERICA TRULY BECOMES THE LAND OF THE FREE AND EQUALITY FOR ALL PEOPLE IN EVERYTHING. THE RICH MUST BE TAXED UNRELETLESSLY& WEALTH &OPPORUNITY DESTIBUTED EQUALLY TO ALL RESIDENTS. NO HUNGER, NO HOMLESSNESS, ALL PEOPLE TREATED EQUALLY

Los Angeles I Homlessness Crisis 2023 I by Dianna Bellerose youtu.be/DKXqsBpBEaE?is=fy7h… via @YouTube

You all aint going to spend to end homlessness. You will use that money to line your own pockets. You want to spend money, free it up by cutting spending for other things.

Thought you were supposed to end homlessness but why lose your voters

Not all too different for homlessness either. What really is the difference between a homeowner association and a local warlord? (Kidding. Mostly.)

that bitch has the power to end homlessness and hunger in the us twice and still be a billionaire and yet he’s making you pay for your app to be purple like

My only problem is I could end world hunger forever With 20 billion $ At the same time cutting the food prices in half. With another 5 billion I could Create 1 million jobs End homlessness free energy And an EV that charges while driving EAT YOUR HEART OUT ELON

I could end ALL hunger and high food costs and homlessness in ALL of Canada FOREVER! with $150,000,000

@cwebbonline is the perfect example of a person enslaved by ideology. His idea of Los Angeles is: Gangs, violence, homlessness, murder, rape, child molestation, cartels, illegal aliens, poor people, failing schools, poverty, drug addiction and suffering. 100% a slave to the democrat party.

Here's the thing though, it would not pay for free college and trade schools for every American in the GOV hands, just like billions spent on homlessness created more homeless. The incentive structure doesn't work like that why? Humans don't value things they get for free.

Why? Most idiotic thing I have heard. But I guess it plays in with the Democratic (Socialist) parties form of enrichment: 1. tax creators at high rates 2. Form activist groups based on causes (ex: homlessness). 3. Funnel money from government to activist groups. Repeat. Basically, stealing wealth from creators and investors.

Good for him. He’s building things of value which people are willing to take the risk of investing their money in. Unfortunately, it seems the Democratic (socialist) party only creates activist groups which funnel money from the government into their pockets. No real value, just whining for causes which has the highest return. Use to be climate change, now its homlessness and palestine.