C Mangang

C Mangang

Users
Tweets

C Mangang

@Thangal71

Apr 24

We cannot ignore the growing concerns surrounding recent developments in Manipur. Questions are being raised about infrastructure expansion in certain hill areas and the possible sources of funding behind them. There are also discussions linking these developments to broader regional policies such as the Burma Act of 2022. These are serious issues that call for transparency, accountability, and a thorough investigation by the authorities. The people deserve clear answers based on facts. At this critical time, it is important for all of us to stay alert, informed, and united. Let us raise our voices responsibly, demand truth through lawful means, and stand together for peace, justice, and the integrity of our land. Source: social media ( Prof. Jugindro) #ManipurCrisis #ManipurUnderSiege #ManipurUnderWatch #JusticeForManipur #PeaceInManipur #StopForeignInterference #ExposeForeignLinks #StopNarcoTerrorism #TerrorismFreeManipur #BewareIllegalDrugsTerrorism #SecureTheHills #InfrastructureTransparency #BurmaAct2022 #BurmaActConcerns #ManipurDevelopmentTransparency #AccountabilityNow #FactBasedInvestigation #UnitedForManipur #SaveManipur #ManipurIntegrity @IndiaTodayNE @NBirenSingh @NELiveTV @NortheastToday @ndtv @ramindesai @IndiaTodayNE @the_hindu @TheBlueHills49 @ukhrultimes @republic @UN @UNHumanRights @BBCHindi @BBCBreaking @BBCWorld @BBCNews @PoknaphamNews @INCIndia @ThePrintIndia @timesofindia

2:23

235

The Public Record

The Public Record

@deepCH_2

Jan 3

📰 BREAKING | INFRASTRUCTURE • PUBLIC SPENDING • RAILWAYS A ₹2-Crore Foot-Overbridge Sparks a Familiar Question: What Are We Paying For? A newly built foot-overbridge (FOB) near Jodhpur Cantt, locally known as the Ket bridge, has ignited an intense public debate—not because it failed, cracked, or collapsed, but because it looks too ordinary for its reported cost of ₹2 crore. The controversy goes to the heart of a question India keeps asking every time civic infrastructure appears: Is this value for money—or just another quiet overrun? Why the Bridge Exists The bridge was sanctioned by Indian Railways after years of local demand. Residents—schoolchildren, workers, daily commuters—had been crossing live railway tracks, with accidents and near-misses repeatedly reported. Local media amplified the risk. The FOB was approved as preventive safety infrastructure, not a beautification project, with officials estimating benefits for tens of thousands of daily users. On purpose, it’s simple. Its job is to stop people from dying. Why the Anger Erupted The backlash began only after photos circulated online. What people saw: •Straight staircases •Basic railings •No lifts, escalators, or architectural flourish What they heard: •₹2 crore That gap—between appearance and price—triggered instant skepticism. Posts framed it as “₹2 crore for concrete and iron,” turning a safety project into a symbol of alleged excess. This wasn’t an engineering critique. It was an optics crisis. Analyst’s View: Why ‘Simple’ Isn’t Cheap Railway FOB costs aren’t driven by looks. They’re driven by constraints most people never see: •Load-bearing and crowd-safety standards •Foundations near live tracks •Construction windows limited by train movement •Signalling, electrification, and clearance norms •Safety supervision, labour compliance, approvals A foot-overbridge isn’t just stairs. It’s a structure that must survive crowds, vibration, weather, and decades of use—over active rail lines. Much of the cost disappears once construction ends, leaving behind something that looks deceptively basic. Investigator’s Check: Any Scam? As of now: •❌ No audit red flags reported •❌ No official allegation of corruption •❌ No evidence of inflated billing made public This is not yet a scam story. It’s a transparency story. Public distrust—earned over years of genuine overruns elsewhere—fills the silence when agencies don’t explain costs. The Pattern India Keeps Repeating Across the country, similar reactions follow: •Flyovers that “look too small” for their price •Safety projects judged by appearance, not impact •Demands for accountability after accidents—and suspicion before explanations This isn’t hypocrisy. It’s a communication failure. What Railways Got Right—and Wrong Right: •Built safety infrastructure before a tragedy. Wrong: •Failed to explain the cost upfront. In today’s climate, silence breeds suspicion. A simple public breakdown—materials, constraints, norms—could have cooled the outrage. Bottom Line This bridge isn’t a monument to extravagance. It’s a mirror of a deeper problem: citizens want safety—and they want to understand its price. Infrastructure doesn’t earn trust just by existing. It earns trust by being explained. Until agencies learn to tell that story, every necessary bridge will keep being judged not by lives saved—but by how expensive it looks. #InfrastructureTransparency #PublicSpending #RailwaySafety

0:06

The Public Record

The Public Record

@deepCH_2

Jan 3

Replying to @gemsofbabus_

3,539

Team Aleem Khan

Team Aleem Khan

@teamaleemkhan

7 Dec 2025

کے پی حکومت نے چند سڑکیں ہمارے حوالے کی ہیں، جن کی دیکھ بھال اور مرمت کی ذمہ داری اب ہم باقاعدہ طور پر انجام دیں گے۔ صدر استحکامِ پاکستان پارٹی و وفاقی وزیر مواصلات عبدالعلیم خان کا سینٹ اجلاس کے وقفہ سوالات میں اظہارِ خیال #aleemkhanforpakistan #AleemKhanInspires #nha #communication #SenateLive #parliamentsession #TransportCooperation #InfrastructureDevelopment #infrastructuretransparency