Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Guidance retweeted
A multi-packed ER-GMLRS with three LRMP submunitions. This would give HIMARS ~300km of range against well defended maritime targets with ER-GMLRS, and can also be used as an ISR platform for targeting with higher echelon systems.
General Atomics unveiled a new concept for an anti-ship submunition capability: Pairing GMLRS, PrSM With Multi-Packed LRMP Submunitions 🇺🇸 Story by @__CJohnston__ navalnews.com/naval-news/202…
5
60
372
27,626
¡BASTA! Nadie va a ver ni apoyar a esos vendidos, ¿creen que somos todos estúpidos? HUMILLARON a todo el país mundialmente, TODOS SE BURLAN DE NOSOTROS por culpa de ellos, ni siquiera perdieron con dignidad para disimular, CAMINARON. Que se vayan a lrmp
1
104
COMO QUE FALLECIÓ GASPI LRMP????????
4
444
lRMP 📣 عرض حصري ⎐كُـود⎐كوبِون⎐خـِصم⎐ ⎐دبدوب⎐ ⎐Q16⊴ ⎐مفارش⊴الحبيب⎐ ⊵CB11⊴ ⎐ايهرب⎐ايهيرب اهرب ⊵IPY1290⊴
LRMP
Estos australianos nos van a coger y encima nos van a ganar
46
Cómo nos están farreando los disparos Unidos 🙄😂 y bien merecido, lrmp Alfaro de mierda
I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHERE PARAGUAY IS
154
Jun 13
Yo ayer intentando ver los partidos en mi tele sin cable..lrmp
Jun 12
No entiendo donde puedo ver los partidos, no quiero apps no paquetes premium soy una señora quiero tocar un botón y que aparezcan dos países intrascendentes jugando al fútbol como fue toda la vida
102
Quiero saber para que me siguen los pichados y amargos, bloquéenme Lrmp y dejen de llorar. Yo no dudo para bloquearlos si les pillo.
4
23
673
Definitivamente tenemos que buscar amistosos de clase A! Contra Nicaragua nomas no es parametro lrmp
31
IAF was WOEFULLY short of AWACS. Yet ... went atmanirbhar with Netra 1, 1A and now 2. Sm with tankers. 2 procurements fell. Nw HAL IAI. Desi ISTAR also. Navy importing LRMP. No indig program. Imp Raf Ms, NH90s, etc etc but no snide remarks?
2
103
🚀 US Army Picks VULCANO 155 GLR for Its New Artillery Guns. 🇺🇸 General Dynamics will produce the VULCNO 155 GLR guided artillery round developed by Leonardo for 155 mm guns, per the US Army’s awarding of a new contract. 🇺🇸 GDOTS announced that it has been awarded a contract by the US Army to produce the VULCANO 155 GLR guided artillery round developed by Italy’s Leonardo. 🇺🇸 The guided round compatible with various 155 mm artillery guns has a range of 70 to 100 km and is guided by GPS/INS navigation by default. Optionally, the rounds can be fitted with laser or IR seekers for moving target engagement. 🚀 The terminal guidance capability, as the officials have specifically touched on the subject, might be a point of investment from the Army, considering the interest in new means of coastal defence. 🚀 Leonardo has also developed VULCANO in other calibres, including 76 mm and 127 mm, with similar features. Additionally, a 120 mm variant is in development for use on main battle tanks. 🚀 General Atomics is developing another new guided round for the US Army, LRMP. Unlike conventional guided rounds, LRMP deploys wings to glide towards the target, similar to small diameter bombs. Beyond artillery guns, LRMP is planned to be used on ER GMLRS artillery rocket and PrSM Increment 3 SRBM as a submunition. kiwi ♥️
56
Replying to @juanitoepidemio
Y también mi voto va contra este viejo hijo de LRMP que salía a burlarse de los directores de hospitales ante los medios.
1
1
15
1,026
airbus is only now moving on a321 MPA since france needs to replace atlantique2 but its for LRMP role and electric power will not be as needed as AWACS. IOC 15-20 yrs away 😁 youtube.com/watch?v=fAzifN3u…
2
5
506
Pakistan Navy’s New Jet LRMP Fleet Signals Major Indian Ocean Power Shift, Expanding Maritime Surveillance and Anti-Submarine Reach defencesecurityasia.com/en/p… @defence_pk @PakDefForum
3
123
P-8I Neptune of the Indian Navy (3D) 🇮🇳 Maritime Patrol aircraft of the Indian Navy⚓️ -ASW -ASuW -ISR -SAR -LRMP -Built on the commercial Boeing 737-800ERX twin-engine passenger jetliner platform, highly modified for combat ops -Unique from USN's P-8A -includes India-specific features and systems -Telephonics APS-143 OceanEye radar and a MAD.
4
3
75
1,923
Imagínate vivir 80 años, es un montón LRMP
4
1
16
1,322
Replying to @strategicfront
Not everything is an argument over why didnt/ what if? My comment was with respect to Israeli tech. However your post has highlighted a larger question. Firstly, the general model followed the world over is that armed forces formulate the requirements, and then handhold private/ govt entities as they develop the tech. IAF has been doing that since forever. Pretty much all aeronautical testing crew is IAF trained. ASTE exists just for this. I mentioned Litening. Who do you think integrated that pod in double quick time, using Indian jugaad? Now, I think you may be referring to original equipment design. Well, firstly, even in ship design, core systems came from foreign sources. Engines, weapons etc. Of late, sensors and fire control systems have become increasingly Indian. DRDO, not Navy has indigenised them (sensors that is). Of course Navy has supported. Like IAF has supported aeronautical R&D. This is not to diminish Navy's role. It was great. But there is a huge difference in complexity between hull and airframe design. For obvious reasons. Many countries around the world make their own ships. But far fewer make fighter aircraft. IN too, does a great job with warships, but goes for imports for LRMP, Drones, fighters, heptrs. Secondly, the US model is one which leverages far deeper industrial and tech base, and private enterprise to do the job. They do a great job of conceptualising and handholding of course. But the US is at a different level. Far greater freedom to military including budgetary discretion, far less bureaucratic control, Greater direct accountability, and the top private industrial/tech sector. We see attempts being made in India. The Mehar Baba competition was the first serious attempt to develop CURRENT tech (not products) harnessing private enterprise. I cannot and will not defend services in all R&D cases. Yes, they could have done better. Even today they can do better. But, the simplified notion that is prevalent, that services (especially Army and IAF) want only to import, is plain wrong. And coming back to Israeli tech. It has served us very well.
1
3
54