“For when Solomon was old, his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God…” 1 Kings 11:4 “Solomon went after Ashtoreth… and after Milcom.” 1 Kings 11:5

What are you saying? I asked a simple question, identify which God. Is the God: Baal Molech (or Milcom) Chemosh Asherah Dago El Zeus Poseidon Apollo Hermes Jupiter Neptune Mars Ra (or Amun-Ra) Osiris Isis Seth Marduk Ishtar (or Inanna) Enlil All these are Allah (God) which God did Jesus submit to. Identify the God. This gymnastics will be useful during the Olympics not here.

Martin Luther King>MLK>Molekh: -pacifistic Christian=Messiah ben Joseph Malcolm X>MiLCom=alt-name for MoLeCh>militaristic Muslim- Messiah ben David >or the Davidic aspect of Yosef MiLCom is an actual variant/cognate of MoLoCh, so both of them relate to the old Semitic MLK.

If the deity you are following is not the governing deity of the entirety of the Reality of Being (Universe, Multiverse, whatever exists), then you are misapplying the “god label” and are probably not a lot of notches above the idolatrous abominations of the Philistines (Dagon), Moab (Kemosh), Ammon (Milcom), etc.

@McConaughey bit superstitious ? You know your traditions of man mean nothing to GOD . #milcom #milesian @wadewarntjes on the same day ? @pontifex nothing will work FATHER please drain them dry zephania 2:11 says and Habakkuk 1:5 confuse them IN JESUS NAME Amen

CellSense: A Sub-6 GHz Cellular ISAC System for Clutter-Robust Passive Sensing Bibhor Kumar, Ish Kumar Jain, Vijay K Shah arxiv.org/abs/2606.07900 [𝚎𝚎𝚜𝚜.𝚂𝚈 𝚎𝚎𝚜𝚜.𝚂𝙿] 💬Submitted to MILCOM 2026

Then Ukraine uses that money to buy weapons from the U.S., who then has to buy replacements from their MILCOM buddies who then line our politicians pockets with kickbacks for more contracts. All with our tax dollars. The Warfare Money Laundering Scheme.

MP in Hanau milcom 2-1987 to 8-1989. Lots of notices about them.

Milcom the abomination of the children of Ammon, did the king defile. 2 Kings 23:12-13 [KJV]

Moloch (sometimes spelled Molech, Milcom or Malcam) is the biblical name of a Canaanite god associated with child sacrifice. The name Moloch results from a dysphemic vocalization of a theonym based on the Semitic root "mlk", or "king".

Here’s the clearest historically grounded map of where Molech/Moloch (MLK-related child sacrifice cultic references) actually appears in sources, and how far those cultures extended. A key constraint up front: “Moloch” is not a continuously tracked deity across millennia. It appears as a cluster of references in specific Semitic and Mediterranean contexts, mainly in the first millennium BCE. 1. Canaanite / Levantine city-states (core origin zone) Time: ~1200–600 BCE (Late Bronze Age collapse → Iron Age) Location: Canaan (modern Israel/Palestine, Lebanon, coastal Syria) What appears here The earliest strong biblical and contextual setting for “passing children through fire” Cultic term often rendered “Molech” (Hebrew: מֹלֶךְ, mlk) Cultural features City-state religion (no unified empire) High-place worship (bamot) Child sacrifice references appear in later biblical polemics about Canaanite practice Influence reach Regional: Levant → coastal trade networks into Cyprus and Egypt Not an empire; more a dense network of city religions 2. Ammonite Kingdom Time: ~900–600 BCE Location: East of Jordan (modern Jordan: Amman region) What appears here The clearest non-Israelite biblical association: Milcom / Molech / “god of the Ammonites” (textual overlap debated) Cultural features Monarchical state religion Likely shared West Semitic pantheon structure “Melech/Milcom” may reflect royal-divine naming conventions Influence reach Local kingdom influence Tributary interactions with Israel, Judah, Assyria 3. Phoenician / Carthaginian world (Tophet tradition) Time: ~800–146 BCE Location: Phoenicia (Lebanon coast) Carthage (modern Tunisia) Western Mediterranean colonies (Sardinia, Sicily, Spain) What appears here This is where the strongest archaeological debate about child sacrifice exists. “Tophet” burial sites containing urns with infant remains Roman and Greek sources accuse Carthaginians of child sacrifice to: Baal Hammon Tanit Some scholars link this to later “Moloch” imagery: Ancient authors sometimes equate Baal Hammon ↔ Kronos/Saturn ↔ Moloch in interpretatio graeca Cultural features Maritime empire Colonization network across Mediterranean State-supported temple complexes Influence reach At its height: North Africa Iberian Peninsula Western Mediterranean islands Trade links across entire Mediterranean basin 4. Israelite/Judean textual tradition (not worship, but condemnation) Time: ~700–500 BCE (text compilation era) Location: Judah (Jerusalem-centered kingdom → Babylonian exile context) What appears here Strongest textual references: Leviticus, Kings, Jeremiah “Molech” is condemned as foreign abomination: child sacrifice (“passing through fire”) syncretism warning Important distinction This is not a culture practicing Molech worship (in the text’s framing), but: a religious polemic system defining itself against it Influence reach Later Judaism → Christianity → Islam interpretive traditions This is where “Moloch” becomes a moral symbol, not just a cultic reference 5. Greco-Roman interpretive layer (reinterpretation, not origin) Time: ~300 BCE–300 CE Location: Mediterranean world What appears here Greeks and Romans interpret foreign gods through their own system: Baal Hammon = Cronus/Saturn sometimes associated with child sacrifice myths Key effect “Moloch” becomes: a symbol of child-devouring deity exaggerated through polemics against Carthage Influence reach Entire Roman Empire narrative space Later medieval and modern reinterpretations 6. Later religious and literary transformation (post-ancient) Time: ~500 CE onward What appears here Jewish rabbinic literature: moralized memory of Molech prohibition Christian texts and medieval commentary Renaissance early modern demonology Major transformation Moloch shifts from: debated cultic term to abstract symbol of destructive sacrifice Big picture summary If you strip away later symbolism, the historically grounded core is: Primary geographic zone: Levant Phoenician world Time window: ~1200–100 BCE (with interpretive echoes later) Cultural type: small kingdoms maritime empire networks Key archaeological controversy: Carthaginian tophets Biblical framing: condemnation of child sacrifice practices associated with surrounding cultures Important correction to keep the model clean There is no continuous “Moloch civilization” stretching back thousands of years. Instead, what exists is: a Semitic linguistic root (MLK = king) a set of regional ritual practices (some involving child sacrifice debates) and a later theological symbol that consolidates them into one figure If you want, I can map how the MLK root (king → sacrifice terminology → deity label → demonization → modern metaphor) evolves step-by-step, because that linguistic chain is actually where most of the confusion comes from.

No one said there is a “problem” with the Tanakh. The issue is that the Tanakh itself contains tensions you are resolving only one way while Second Temple Jews had other categories later restricted by rabbinic Judaism. “God is not a man” it’s about God not lying or changing His mind like sinful humans, not his capacity to manifest. The same Torah also has God appearing to Abraham, wrestling Jacob, speaking face to face with Moses, etc. So clearly the verse is not saying God can never manifest visibly. And “I will not give My glory to another” only works if Jesus is assumed to be “another” separate god like Baal/Milcom. We are believe the God of Israel revealed Himself through Messiah, not that YHWH handed His glory to a rival deity.

another grotesque miscalculation root in twisted violent delluntions of messianic religiosity that has become a cabal in Washington. Milcom/Molech, Chemosh, and Baal/Asherah

Como siempre MILCOM nos hace estupendas ofertas a IGC. Si estás en Seguridad Ciudadana, Tráfico o Aduanas puedes realizar un curso técnico de inglés a un gran precio. Llama para informarte. #IGC #TuEresIGC @grupomilcom

Lookup Arch of Triumph and Temple of Ba'al. Being replaced by: Arch of Trump Whitehouse State Ballroom aka ba'al room These are near exact replicas of pagan Arch and temple in Palmyra. It will have an underground nuclear bunker and hospital. Baal and Moloch were distinct Canaanite/Phoenician deities with different roles. Baal was generally a storm and fertility god representing life-giving rain. Moloch (or Molech) was associated specifically with fire and child sacrifice. Some scholars believe "Moloch" was not a deity name, but a title for a king or a term for a type of sacrifice Key Differences and Connections: Role & Symbolism: Baal ("Lord") was a thunder god ("rider of the clouds") who brought rain and prosperity. Moloch represented total consumption and destruction through fire. Worship: Baal worship was often tied to agricultural prosperity and nature cycles. Moloch worship involved feeding children into a fiery furnace (known as Topheth), often linked in the Bible to Molech or sometimes a form of Baal worship. Relationship: Some evidence suggests Moloch was a specialized cult form of a deity like Baal-Hadad or Milcom, rather than an entirely different being. Biblical Interpretation: The Hebrew Bible often condemns both, with "Moloch" potentially representing a deliberate mis-vocalization of the Hebrew melek ("king") combined with boshet ("shame").

Lookup Arch of Triumph and Temple of Ba'al. Being replaced by: Arch of Trump Whitehouse State Ballroom aka ba'al room These are near exact replicas of pagan Arch and temple in Palmyra. It will have an underground nuclear bunker and hospital. Baal and Moloch were distinct Canaanite/Phoenician deities with different roles. Baal was generally a storm and fertility god representing life-giving rain. Moloch (or Molech) was associated specifically with fire and child sacrifice. Some scholars believe "Moloch" was not a deity name, but a title for a king or a term for a type of sacrifice Key Differences and Connections: Role & Symbolism: Baal ("Lord") was a thunder god ("rider of the clouds") who brought rain and prosperity. Moloch represented total consumption and destruction through fire. Worship: Baal worship was often tied to agricultural prosperity and nature cycles. Moloch worship involved feeding children into a fiery furnace (known as Topheth), often linked in the Bible to Molech or sometimes a form of Baal worship. Relationship: Some evidence suggests Moloch was a specialized cult form of a deity like Baal-Hadad or Milcom, rather than an entirely different being. Biblical Interpretation: The Hebrew Bible often condemns both, with "Moloch" potentially representing a deliberate mis-vocalization of the Hebrew melek ("king") combined with boshet ("shame").

It is funny because Isaiah was reprimanding people like Brand, who pretended they still were following the covenant of Yahweh, but were instead worshipping abominations like Ashtoreth, Milcom, Chemosh, and Molech.