Justice belongs to those who claim it, but let the claimant beware lest he create new injustice by his claim and thus set the bloody pendulum of revenge into its inexorable motion. ~ Frank Herbert

A bad day for the war mongers is a good day for humanity!

If you think JD won’t sell us out to Israel like Trump did You. Are. An. Idiot. Republicans are owned by the Israeli lobby

I waited 20 minutes today for a Walmart employee to unlock a pack of razors from the security case for me, and it’s not because Elon Musk is stealing them.

Well Tom, your oath is to the United States of America, you need to step down immediately.

Hey dipshit: Ever heard of the First Amendment?

Americans don’t want FISA 702 without a warrant They want the SAVE America Act If you’re with me on this, post one of these: 🇺🇸

The politicians imprison people to hide their crimes

I'm sorry but if you believe governments around the world that are ignoring and/or involved in a global pedophilia ring are forcing digital ID for internet access to "protect the children", you are really fucking stupid.

🚨🇮🇱 Mike Huckabee says: “Without Israel there would not be an America. We owe our very existence to what happened here.” Revoke this mans US citizenship and leave his ass in Israel.

At this point an American invasion of Britain would be a thousand times more justified than any military action we've taken in my lifetime.

UK is a police state

The violence in Belfast is wrong. Burning homes is wrong. Attacking innocent people is wrong. None of that should be excused. The thing is, Many governments have forgotten something fundamental: > Public opinion is data. When large numbers of people are saying they are worried about immigration, cultural change, crime, housing, social cohesion, or the future of their communities, the government's first response should not be, "How do we stop people from saying this?" The first response should be: "WHY are people saying this?" Maybe they're right. Maybe they're wrong. Maybe the problem is real. Maybe the problem is exaggerated. Maybe people are working from incomplete information. Maybe they're being manipulated by propaganda. Maybe government statistics are failing to capture something people are experiencing firsthand. Maybe government statistics are correct, but the public has lost trust in the institutions presenting them. You don't find out which explanation is true by threatening, censoring, or criminalizing speech. You find out by listening. A smart government treats public complaints as a diagnostic tool. If people believe crime is rising, investigate. If people believe immigration is causing social problems, investigate. If people believe courts are protecting some groups while punishing others, investigate. If people believe the government is hiding information, publish more information. The goal is not to validate every fear. The goal is to understand it. People do not become less afraid when you tell them they're forbidden from expressing fear. They become more afraid. They become more suspicious. Eventually they conclude that if peaceful speech is ignored, only louder methods will get attention. That does not justify riots. It does not justify violence. It does not justify burning homes. But it does explain why governments that stop listening eventually find themselves confronted by people who have stopped talking and start fighting. Free speech is not merely a right. It is an early warning system. A government that disables its own warning system should not be surprised when it discovers the fire only after the building is already burning.

Because creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and thousands of multi-millionaires isn’t benefiting others. 🙄

"Style" He wants to ban guns because they are a particular imaginary style. Obviously there is no end to the guns he and his like could and would ban based on their impression of that gun's "style." The do, in fact, want to and plan to ban ALL guns. Believe it.

1SG: SFC, we had a Soldier use the open door policy today. It involves you. SFC: Ok, 1SG. 1SG: Did you tell PV2 Snuffy to STFU and get back to work. SFC: Absolutely. 1SG: Reason being? SFC: Because I didn't want PV2 Snuffy to continue speaking and I wanted her to get back to work. 1SG: I understand but what caused you to say that? SFC: Well, after I put out what needed to be done for the day, PV2 Snuffy was being told what to do and kept asking her NCO, "why?" So after the third "why" | calmly told PV2 Snuffy to STFU, and do what the fuck she's told. Then after she made the sad face, I told her to get the fuck back to work. 1SG: You can't just curse at Soldiers like that. SFC: Why, 1SG? 1SG: Because you just can't anymore, SFC. SFC: But why, 1SG? 1SG: Because these Soldiers are too sensitive and they complain about everything. SFC: Ok but why, 1SG? 1SG: Because I goddamn fucking said so! Aww, shit. Motherfuck... SFC: I'd like to use the Commander's open door policy, 1SG. 1SG: GTFO of my office. SFC: Why? 1SG: I fucking h8 you.

Get a load of this guy thinking that these migrants own homes and cars. The people who are upset paid for it. They own it.

I’m rooting for the far right in Belfast. I have more interest in this than the World Cup.

LINDSEY GRAHAM: “We should unleash Israel if Iran doesn’t sign a deal right now.” Thanks, South Carolina, for giving us six more years of this warmongering homosexual.

(•_•) <)   )╯. get  /    \  \(•_•)   (   (>  a  /    \   (•_•)  <)   )>  warrant  /    \