Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
🚨 LUNC COİN VİDEOMUZ YAYINDA! 🚨 🎥 SDK 53 güncellemesi 📊 Market Module teklifi 💵 USTC Repeg sürecinde son durum Hepsini detaylarıyla konuştuk. Terra Classic ekosisteminde neler oluyor, sırada ne var merak ediyorsan bu video kaçmaz 👇 👉 İzle: youtube.com/watch?v=QDFkdgXf… 🔥 LUNC tarafında kritik gelişmeler kapıda 📈 Topluluk ve teknik ilerleme birlikte gidiyor #LUNC #TerraClassic #SDK53 #MarketModule #USTC #Repeg #Kripto #Coincim
1
14
1,233
🚨🚨🚨EXPOSED: GP's SHOCKING Betrayal of "Binance's Right Arm" Allnodes – Votes AGAINST Them in Over 55% of Key Props! 😱🔥 HYPOCRISY PROOF! Hey #LUNCCommunity! @Greenpeace06_09 (GP) endlessly calls @Allnodes "Binance's extended arm" 👀 – straight from his mouth: "extended arms of Binance ALLNODES & AUTOSTAKE" (x.com/Greenpeace06_09/status…). As a self-proclaimed Binance insider/advocate who "discovered their Recovery Plan first," he pushes massive burns! 🔥 But FACTS show GP votes AGAINST Allnodes' positions in over 55% of tracked proposals since he started voting in late 2023 – blocking progress while claiming Binance loyalty! 🤯 Compiled from on-chain records, X posts, and governance data. #CryptoHypocrisy 🚨 Factual Proof of GP Opposing Allnodes: 🚨 1. Prop 12188 (MM2 - Market Module Reactivation for Liquidity): Allnodes abstained (neutral per records), GP voted NO 🚫 – directly blocking dev Allnodes didn't veto. Passed ✅. Details: station.terra.money/proposal… #MarketModule 2. USTC Staking Signal Prop (Utility & Supply Reduction): Allnodes abstained, GP voted NO 🚫 – opposing DeFi growth Allnodes stayed silent on. Pending ⏳. Frag's post: x.com/frag_dude/status/19719… #USTCStaking 3. Funds Recovery Prop (~$6.68M Exploit, 15% Fee): Allnodes abstained, GP voted NO with VETO 🚫 – halting recovery that could aid burns, against Allnodes' neutral stance. Ongoing 🕒. GP's post: x.com/Greenpeace06_09/status… #FundsRecovery 4. IBC Relaying Prop (Fund 6 Months Interop ~$10K): Allnodes abstained, GP voted NO 🚫 – blocking infrastructure tied to Juris, differing from Allnodes' non-opposition. Passed ✅. Frag exposes: x.com/frag_dude/status/19834… #IBCFunding 5. Prop 12192 (USTD Dev Prop - Downvoted): Allnodes abstained on contentious dev, GP voted NO with VETO 🚫 – overriding where Allnodes remained neutral. Failed ❌. GP's related post: x.com/Greenpeace06_09/status… #USTD 6. Prop 12176 ($25K to Terra Rebels from Funds): Allnodes abstained, GP voted NO 🚫 – pushing veto on community spend Allnodes didn't block. Failed ❌. GP's call: x.com/Greenpeace06_09/status… #TerraRebels 7. Prop to Burn USTC Funds (Dec 2023 Signal - Failed): Allnodes abstained on small burn, GP voted NO with VETO 🚫 – against minor supply reduction despite his burn advocacy. Failed ❌. GP's post: x.com/Greenpeace06_09/status… #USTCBurn ⚠️Out of 12 tracked props since GP's start in late 2023 ( HE ONLY aligned on 5 like 10983/11111 tax burns), GP opposes Allnodes in 7 – that's ~58%! 😤 He targets Vegas/Juris fights over true alignment, stalling LUNC's DeFi, liquidity & recovery. Is this "Binance advocacy" or self-sabotage? 🤔 What do YOU think – GP hero or hurdle? Spill below! 💬 #TerraLunaClassic #LUNC #BinanceBurn #ValidatorDrama #Web3Exposed
Would love to know why this prop is not an absolute waste of time. Burning 8M UST with a 9B supply does absolutely nothing.... It's from Vegas. I wouldn't expect anything different. Dumbest con man in all of crypto. How anyone listens to this clown....🙄
1
14
60
2,920
🚨 Market Module 2.0 PASSED! 🚨 Proposal #12188 has been approved on Terra Classic! ✅ The no-mint version brings back the Market Module with no inflation, deflationary pressure, and price oracle protection. Implementation next — v3.5.0 upgrade drops Aug 15 🔥 LFG $LUNC 🔥🌕 #LUNC #TerraClassic #CryptoNews #MarketModule #NoMint #CryptoUpdate #Deflationary
2
9
68
2,826
24 Jul 2025
🚨 Proposal 12186 is LIVE on Terra Classic! SDK upgrade to 50.13 ✅ Vegas node voted Yes. A big step forward! 🔥 Whitelist update is nearly ready (just coordinating with third parties) — opening the door for more CEXs & more off-chain burns! 🔥🔥 MM2 proposal is in the deposit phase — going live soon! 🚀 #prop12188 A Rescue team will propose very soon to retrie off-chain assets back to chain — this could be HUGE 👀 Terra Station bug fixes also incoming 🛠️ The more wallets working properly, the better 🙂 $LUNC is heating up! #TerraClassic #LUNC #USTC $USTC thank you all : @Luncverse @blv_labs @ColeStrathclyde @StationWallet #MM2 #MM #MarketModule #Burn #LunaClassic
18
59
268
14,498
🚨 HISTORIC PROPOSAL for Terra Classic 🚨 📜 $LUNC $USTC — A Revival That Could Rewrite Crypto History 🔄🌕 3 years after the crash heard around the world… 🔥 Terra Classic is building again. And this time, it’s smarter, stronger — and ready to rise. #MarketModule
2
162
13 Jun 2025
Guys, let’s stay focused. Finally, we see a real proposal based on lessons learned from 2022 — fully designed, secured and backed by actual logic. MarketModule 2.0 is not about pumping or playing with the price — it’s about controlled deflation, real supply management, and long-
3
39
13 Jun 2025
🔄 Day 2: MarketModule 2.0 — still waiting for dev team feedback! 🚀 We are ready. LUNC community is watching. #MarketModule2 #LUNC #ExecutionMatters
2
3
161
12 Jun 2025
🚨 MarketModule 2.0 — The Ultimate Comeback Plan For $LUNC 🚨 🔥 The system we NEEDED in 2022. 🔥 The system we FINALLY have in 2025. 🔥 Controlled. Deflationary. Bulletproof.
3
18
74
3,425
Why eventually we also need to burn some #LUNC to re enable #MarketModule 👇 #Lunaclassic #LUNCcommunity #Ustcburn #ustc #Crypto
Replying to @XrpJ5
Check this out 1. Market Module Basics The market module facilitates swaps between tokens in the Terra ecosystem (e.g., LUNC ↔ USTC). Historically, it allowed for the minting and burning of LUNC or USTC to maintain USTC’s peg. However, after the Terra ecosystem collapse in 2022, the mint-burn mechanism was disabled to prevent further destabilization. 2. Supply Relationship (LUNC > USTC) •If the LUNC supply is higher than the USTC supply, this does not inherently break the market module. •The module can still perform swaps between LUNC and USTC based on market demand, provided there is sufficient liquidity in the pools to facilitate these swaps. 3. Constraints Without Mint/Burn In the current state: •LUNC is no longer minted or burned automatically to stabilize USTC. Thus, the absolute supply of each token is less relevant unless a re-peg mechanism is introduced. •The market module operates based on liquidity pools and user-initiated trades, meaning supply ratios only matter if one token runs out of liquidity in the module. 4. Repeg and Supply Dynamics If a re-peg mechanism is introduced, the relationship between LUNC and USTC supply will matter more: •If LUNC’s supply vastly exceeds USTC’s, aggressive minting or burning of LUNC could cause significant inflation or price dilution. •For a successful re-peg, the system would need a sustainable way to reduce the LUNC supply while increasing demand for USTC. 5. Current Practical Use •The market module is primarily used for swaps now and doesn’t rely on supply parity between tokens. Its operation is unaffected by the imbalance between LUNC and USTC supplies. In summary, the market module can operate with a higher LUNC supply compared to USTC as long as its function is limited to facilitating swaps rather than mint-burn mechanics. However, for long-term goals like re-pegging USTC, the supply dynamics would need careful management.
7
27
791
No, i listened to this guy, he says: They will Create new stablecoin from beginning with 1$ Pegged. Long story short, USTC remains as it is, but NEW COIN will so the job of $UST before pegged with MarketModule on.
1
4
297
What do you think of this #LUNCCommunity Lets just work towards this together 👇 👇 👇 Proposal to Enhance the Stability and Security of the #LunaClassic #MarketModule Objective: Strengthen the Luna Classic (#LUNC) market module to protect against future attacks, reduce volatility, and maintain long-term stability in the #ecosystem. Key Enhancements 1.Dynamic Peg Stabilization •Adaptive Peg Mechanism: Introduce a floating peg that adjusts based on market conditions to reduce vulnerability to extreme price swings. •Volatility-Based Supply Adjustments: Automatically control supply changes (minting/burning) based on price volatility to prevent hyperinflation or severe deflation. 2.Collateralization for Added Security •Partial Collateralization: Create reserves in liquid assets (e.g., stablecoins) as a safety net to support the peg, making the system less reliant on pure algorithmic methods. •Diversified Reserve Pool: Diversify reserves with assets like BTC and ETH, enhancing resilience against market shocks. 3.Enhanced Transaction Controls •Transaction Limits in High Volatility: Implement transaction caps or slippage limits during extreme conditions to reduce risks from large, destabilizing trades. •Circuit Breakers: Use circuit breakers that pause transactions when prices deviate sharply, allowing for quick stabilization measures. 4.Supply Expansion Decay Mechanism •Gradual Burn of Minted Tokens: If new tokens are minted to restore the peg, implement a decay mechanism to gradually burn them over time, preventing inflation. •Minting Rate Caps: Set caps on minting within a specific timeframe, avoiding hyperinflation during depegging events. 5.Stability Fees and Dynamic Interest Rates •Stability Fees: Introduce a variable fee on LUNC-USTC redemptions, adjusting based on market conditions to disincentivize short-term exploitative conversions. •Dynamic Staking Rewards: Align staking interest rates with the peg status, incentivizing users to hold during critical periods and avoid destabilizing moves. 6.Improved Governance and Transparency •Multi-Sig and DAO Oversight: Use multi-signature and DAO-based approvals for market module changes, ensuring key decisions have broad consensus. •Routine Audits: Publish regular transparency reports on reserves and market module status to build community trust. 7.Advanced Risk Monitoring •Automated Risk Detection: Implement on-chain systems to monitor for unusual trading patterns and volume, automatically triggering alerts or protective measures. •Sentiment Analysis: Monitor external data (news, social media) using AI-driven sentiment analysis to detect potential threats or manipulation efforts. 8.Incentives for Long-Term Stability •Holding Rewards During Volatility: Offer increased rewards for holding or staking during high volatility, incentivizing stability. •Community Insurance Pools: Establish insurance pools to compensate for losses from extreme devaluation due to attacks, bolstering confidence. Conclusion These enhancements collectively offer a robust and multi-layered strategy to protect the LUNC ecosystem from future attacks and volatility. By adopting adaptive, collateral-backed, and community-governed mechanisms, we can build a more resilient and sustainable future for Luna Classic. This proposal seeks community support to safeguard LUNC’s stability and ensure long-term success. We invite the Luna Classic community to support and contribute to this proposal. Signed, #FRGUniverse #Cookie #LNC #EDU #DTh #Tomjerry #THC #FOOD #GRDX
5
3
21
3,218
Hey @ColeStrathclyde @wrapped_dday @zkdomains @frag_dude @igorsoares62 we worked good bit on #USTC repeg ideas. What would be a good target for #Ustc supply to attempt a soft peg and reenable #MarketModule ? This way we have a number to work towards. #LUNC #Lunccommunity #Ustc #Repeg
8
8
38
4,529
12 Jun 2024
This is why i think implementing an assembly/council of active validators is a good idea, we now need to get serious and sort our shit out, get any advice from experts we need and push this chain to glory, get the Marketmodule back on, potentially get legal advise on USTC.
2
5
192
21 Apr 2024
Here I share an idea to controll USTC will not depeg again. It is very simple and realistic. #Lunc #Repegpossilbe #Terra #marketmodule
2
4
240
9 Mar 2024
書いていて新たな疑問が出てきました。 (自己解決したと思いますので疑問はありません) ■理解できたケース (ペグが$1から離れていく) USTC $1.00 -> $0.99 -> $0.98 となった場合 <流れ> $1.00 - $0.99 = $0.01 の差をStaking RewardとしてUSTC PoolからStakerへ送る $0.99 - $0.98 = $0.01 の差を同じくStaking Rewardとして送る ■疑問と思ったケース (ペグが$1から離れて、その後に$1に近づく) $1.00 -> $0.98 -> $0.99 となる場合 <流れ> $1.00 - $0.98 = $0.02 の差をStaking Rewardとして出す。 $0.98 - $0.99 = $0.01 の差をどうするか??WalletからRewardを減らす? と、ここまで書いて自己完結しました。 MarketModuleは毎回トランザクションが発生したタイミングで実行され、$1で固定されているので、上記の流れにならないです。 > $0.98 - $0.99 = $0.01 の差をどうするか?? この対応が存在しない。 常に$1.00との比較になるので、 $1.00 - $0.98 = $0.02 の差をStaking Rewardとして受け取る $1.00 - $0.99 = $0.01 の差をStaking Rewardとして受け取る という動きになると考えました。 という事で質問、疑問ではありません。
2
110
6 Mar 2024
I'm calling it as i see it, The promise of progress in the MarketModule and Repeg is now being used as a weapon to push agendas, this is not how this community works, Sounds awfully similar to some other people who did the same....
#LUNCcommunity There is much talk about the impossibility of opening the MM, but I will try to explain that it is easier to avoid the death spiral than imagined. First, implement a supply limiter (dynamic, decreasing by 5% per transaction);
7
4
17
1,094
5 Mar 2024
What happened to the work on repeg and Marketmodule ?
1
2
308
17 Feb 2024
I think we have lost our vision, we have lost what we want, we are not focused and driven, we want this chain revived but how do we get there ? we have tools like the MarketModule and USTC repeg but what is happening with them ? these two things are our biggest chance at revival.
2
3
10
894
2 Feb 2024
Replying to @Cryptancy
i fully believe this project can hit $1 and alot higher, we just need to unite and work on the things that matter like security ( to rebuild the trust ) and the repeg and MarketModule, once we have done these then i believe the sky is the limit
1
3
72
30 Jan 2024
Replying to @LunaClassicDAO
Has there been any news in regards to the team working on the repeg and Marketmodule behind closed doors ?
2
79