The future of tokenomics has always been modelling.
It's pretty hilarious when I find people on X believe that most protocols are looking at a goldmine (HL's tokenomics) but refusing to copy it but this should never actually be a topic of discussion.
Not all token are equal. Tokens inherently do not just depend on demand but supply and network participants and higher tokenomics landscape. I recently submitted a proposal to Avalanche to show the relationship between value accrual and PoS chains and would be using different modelling times.
Seeing Neel build this makes me see so much that the industry still has underdogs within although I have some things i'll love to see here but maybe it might be unrealistic to do on the Delphi platform.
In modelling, most times the goal is to know the possible outcomes that could happen not only in token emission or supply shocks but also founders ought to know questions such for example:
1. What lowers the rate of velocity and what fastens the rate of this token's velocity?
2. If a node validator decides to unbond and more comes in what then happens?
This might take into consideration modelling formats such as stochastic or even agent-based modelling which might be difficult to exactly square in for the general public maybe there'll be different modelling on Delphi for PoS chains, for Perp protocol, other verticals/categories etc
On the other hand if you're founder you really should check this out.