Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
WAIT does OUTSYSTEM have already claude-code integrated? i am so behind
10
You can't outwork your way to freedom. You have to outsystem it.
2
3
6
80
Mar 11
スピル使ってるExcelファイルをOutSystemのAdvanced Excelで扱うと、数式が{=〜}になってしまう。再度スピルさせるには手動で編集状態から入力再確定しなければいけないのだが、数式自体は失われる事がなく、機械的な操作で復元できる。マイクロソフトのこういう将来を見越した設計は凄いなと思う一方、1セル1セル再確定する以外の復元方法が無い気の利かなさも、マイクロソフトっぽい。
1
2
3
1,059
Latest design phase of my hybrid fast colony torchship. The ring locks when it’s in a high acceleration burn. Getting there, just a few more tweaks. Feels like the historic period of my space setting - likely mid/late 21st. Possibly refitted later for going outsystem.
Working on a new spaceship design. It'll get some doctoring for realism.
1
7
330
おもろそうやな ローコードはoutsystemを使ったことあるけどもっとごりごり触ってみたいので買おうかな
【ローコードで安全に】倉本栞さん,小金澤蓮さん 執筆の『はじめてのMicrosoft Copilot Studio入門~ローコードではじめる業務AIエージェント』が第2刷の増刷決定!ハンズオン形式でわかりやすく解説。社内のデータを使った安全なエージェント開発をしてみましょう!gihyo.jp/book/2025/978-4-297…
2
178
It's slipped into my head that I could drop the scale from the big slow ships in Corsairs to adventurer-owned shuttlecraft that can buy a ride outsystem if a visiting big ship has the hangar space. There's some possibilities there.
1
2
86
Replying to @Yneas_
vro tried to outsystem the system
2
42
6 Aug 2025
📌 Comparative Analysis Italy 🇮🇹 vs 🇧🇷Brazil (2025 VNL Women’s Final) 📌 1. Attacking Performance Italy showcased superior attacking efficiency throughout the match. The team scored 43 points from attacks, surpassing Brazil’s 34 points. Additionally, Italy recorded a higher attack efficiency at 22.2%, while Brazil trailed with only 15.6%. This reflects Italy’s ability to execute offensive plays with greater accuracy and consistency. Moreover, Italy was significantly more effective when attacking in-system—following a quality reception—converting 55.6% of such opportunities, compared to Brazil’s 40%. They also maintained a higher attacking percentage after a “very good pass” (Pass ), at 34.5% versus Brazil’s 28.6%. These figures underline Italy’s tactical discipline and their setters’ ability to optimize every pass into scoring chances. 📌 2. Serving Game While Italy scored more aces (3 vs. 2), Brazil demonstrated superior serving consistency and control. Brazil committed only 8% serving errors, compared to Italy’s 13.7%, and had fewer out-of-bounds serves (7 vs. Italy’s 13). These numbers suggest that Brazil prioritized precision and reliability over aggressive serving. Interestingly, Brazil had a higher percentage of serves aimed at disrupting the opponent’s system (42% OutSystem vs. Italy’s 39%). However, Italy incurred higher Serve Extreme Cost (4.33 vs. Brazil’s 3.5), indicating that their aggressive serving approach often backfired, resulting in unnecessary point losses. 📌 3. Reception Quality Brazil exhibited slightly better first-ball reception, with 61% of receptions rated as “very good” (Pass # ), compared to Italy’s 58%. They also had a higher rate of average-quality receptions (Pass =) at 12.2%, while Italy posted just 4.9%. Nonetheless, Italy led in overall reception efficiency (Pass Eff) with 53.1%, surpassing Brazil’s 48.8%. This suggests that while Brazil received more balls in total, Italy was more effective in turning those receptions into successful offensive transitions. Their better pass-to-attack conversions likely contributed to their dominant offensive performance. 📌 4. Blocking Efficiency Blocking was one of Italy’s strongest suits. The team tallied 15 block points, compared to Brazil’s 12. Italy also recorded more blocks per set (11.5 vs. 10.5) and had a higher success rate in terms of effective and positive blocks (%Blocks # & ) 52.3% against Brazil’s 46.2%. This dominance in blocking indicates excellent reading of the opponent’s offense and cohesive net-front coordination, limiting Brazil’s scoring opportunities and disrupting their attack rhythm. 📌 5. Defensive Capability Italy clearly outperformed Brazil in backcourt defense. With a defensive efficiency of 44% compared to Brazil’s 28%, Italy proved more capable in sustaining rallies and converting defense into attack. Italy also averaged 14.5 defensive actions per set, exceeding Brazil’s 13.25, and achieved a higher percentage of positive touches (51.7%) versus Brazil’s 49.9%. These figures highlight Italy’s ability to absorb pressure and transition effectively, which was critical in keeping momentum during crucial points. ✅ Conclusion it is evident that Italy dominated in nearly all core areas—notably in attacking, blocking, and defense. Although Italy committed more errors in serving, they compensated with high offensive and defensive efficiency, strategic net play, and the ability to capitalize on Brazil’s weaknesses. Brazil, while demonstrating strong serve accuracy and solid reception, struggled to maintain consistency in offense and defense. Their lower attack efficiency and limited success in blocking and digging were key factors in their defeat. Ultimately, the victory reflects Italy’s superior all-around execution, balanced tactics, and resilience under pressure—key traits of a championship-winning team. Pic : cesar
3
14
1,107
18 Jul 2025
Replying to @WjgotINrU14Z1fB
OutSystem(ローコード)に関して言うと、ぶっちゃけ1週間くらい真面目に取り組めば標準的な機能での開発は出来るようになります(´・ω・`) 学習用のコンテンツも日本語のオンラインヘルプも結構しっかりあり、それでいて拡張性もそれなり…。 欠点はやはりライセンス料がたka…
1
2
274
Design, deploy, and manage autonomous agents and workflows using secure, scalable, and integrated low-code. Try OutSystem here: fnf.dev/3G9X0zk

1
1
5
423
Replying to @EYakoby
Notice it says "indepedent expenditures & campaign contributions received from pro-Israel interest groups" Moved those goalposts so far, so fast, they broke escape velocity and are headed outsystem at light speed.
7
128
基幹システムをノーコードで作るのまだ早いかなと思います。OutsystemとかService Now、Medixだと国内でも事例あるみたいです。ローコードだと選択肢広がるし、基幹に更新入れるシステムの事例もあります。あとSAPがノーコード化するの待つとかですね。
基幹システムってノーコードで作れんの? よくわからんベンダーやらコンサルに金取られて粗悪品掴まされて、プロジェクト凍結する未来が見えるんだけど… こんな機能も作れないの?ってなって結局カスタムモリモリで開発費やら保守費がヤバイ事になるんでしょ😢
1
5
1,149
お誕生日のフレさんにFade outsystem(マテリアル全てにdissolveの設定しないと使えない)か絵画に入るギミック(マテリアルのレンダキューを全て触らないといけない)とかいう鬼畜なものしか思い浮かばなくて結局無難に使いやすいものを送ってしまったハクさんであった
6
372
◼️شركة outsystem المتخصصة توفير منصات برمجية للتطبيقات وتحديدا في تقنية low code platform في اخر جولة استثمارية لها مغلقة في عام 2022 بلغ تقييمها حوالي 9.5 ملياردولار ◼️دخول صندوق الاستثمار KKR & Co باستثمار بقيمة حوالي 228.4 مليون دولار في الجوالة الأخيرة ◼️ايرادات الشركة للسنوات ,2024,2023 كالتي: ◼️2023: 262.8 مليون دولار ◼️2024: 331.6 مليون دولار ◼️الشركة بدات اعمالها في عام 2001 #تقنية #استثمار #الأسهم_الأمريكية #الاسهم_السعودية forbes.com/sites/kenrickcai/…
2
3
799
同窓会行って割とモチベ上がった。 どうでもいいこと呟いてたけどエンジニア垢として自分のスキル向上のためのポストをしていてこう。 #まずはOutsystem #aws #python 余裕を見つけて
1
4
218
1/2 There were sooo many good points made by all on this episode, but this may have been the best point made and I think the biggest issue with the Griz right now. I wish Bobby/Pease would STOP trying to outsmart and outsystem opponents and just give our DUDES the ball more.
1
2
168
19 Nov 2024
Algum QA que ja testou em Mendix ou OutSystem por ai? 8K PJ
19 Nov 2024
Tem QA de LowCode por aqui? To com uma vaguinha quente
2
350
18 Jul 2024
outsystem 派遣免許 フルリモ 出張可能 明日面談くめます 電話かラインかメールください #案件情報 #ses営業 #ses
2
5
569
5 Jul 2024
Replying to @imandreans
Ada outsystem tinggal drag n drop, ga usah coding2 ui yg rumit Wkwkwkwk
1
880
It just occurred to me that this would work with eccentric orbits just fine. Your planet would speed up as it enters the biozone and hot zone, and it'd pump the brakes when going outsystem the same way.
3
91