I was going to sequentially compute but I remembered the arithmetic rule similar to PMDAS so I went to comments instead πΆβπ«οΈ
476
Both are correct. PMDAS is the standard. If you reverse the 200 and 400 then you will get the same answer.
7
80?
PMDAS
20Γ·1/2 =10
10 10 =20
100-20 =80
1
31
Jun 10
"pmdas has a buffer overflow / race condition, will you be patching that?"
54
1,213
Jun 10
Either 5 or -6
PMDAS principle says we multiply first and do additions afterwards.
b b Γ b = 30
(5 Γ 5) = 25
(25) 5 = 30π
[(-6) Γ (-6)] = 36
[36] (-6) = 30π
2
Thanks Gabe for your thoughts. I don't agree, but that's not important.
pmdas has a buffer overflow / race condition, will you be patching that?
14
4
38,494
Using the order of operation PMDAS...the answer is 104.
1
1
4
961
his isnβt a PMDAS issue this is a linguistic/semantics issue.
200/100 = 2
Then add 30 = 32
2
1,117
Mar 30
PMDAS = Parentheses, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction.
60Γ·5(1 1(1 1))
(1 1=2)Γ(1 1=2)
60Γ·5(4)
5Γ4=20
60Γ·20=3
Answer = 3
1
3
104
Mar 25
None of the numbers
PMDAS rule
Parentheses
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
Therefore 7:7=1
7 1 7=15
The answer is 15
1
14
848
If weβre going PMDAS, P(3 3)=6, M 6(6)=36, D 72/36=2. D 2/3= 0.6666666667 or 2/3.
2
5
117
