“A theological proposition strictly so called is one which is supernaturally revealed, or, which is revealed by a revelation which in its mode and entity is supernatural, that is, a theological proposition is one in which the union of the extremes uniquely in its being known depends on supernatural revelation. What a philosophical proposition is easily becomes clear, because the science of opposites is the same, namely, a philosophical proposition is not to be estimated from the nature of its extremes, namely of the subject and the predicate, but rather from their connection and union. For the following proposition, that in one divine essence there are three really distinct persons, if you look at its extremes in themselves, it is philosophical, and they are considered by the metaphysician in signified act. However, it is not thereby metaphysical. Why? For no other reason than that metaphysics cannot render a reason that the predicate truly belongs to the subject. Therefore a philosophical proposition is one in which the identity of the subject and the predicate is naturally evident, or depends upon a philosophical principle. A theological argument is one in which the union of the middle term either with both, or with one or the other of the extremes is supernaturally revealed. On the other hand, a philosophical argument is one in which the union of the middle term with both of the extremes is naturally knowable, or, whose both premises are philosophical and are sought from reason. It is notably said that a theological argument is one in which the union of the middle term and the extremes is supernaturally revealed, because as for the middle term itself in a theological argument, it is not necessary that it be supernaturally revealed and sought from Sacred Scripture.” — Bl. Johann Posewitz, Metaphysical Theology (Prog., n. 2)

You don't have the mental acuity to see the difference between Donald Trump's first term, and his second. His first term he was blanketed by a fake Russia collusion hoax investigation that led to a special council with no predicate crime. You're gonna watch those people go to prison, or face military tribunal if those crimes reached the level of treason. The crimes that were committed for stealing elections with the fraudulent election system they created dating back to at least 2006 is definitely going to land them in a military courtroom, because they've always worked with adversaries outside of our country to do it. That's an act of war. They rated a former president's home with no predicate whatsoever to do so. Keep laughing you stupid fucker. You're gonna lose this war. Trump doesn't lose wars. He's neutralized all of the external threats outside of our country, and very soon it's going to be time to start directing his attention to inside our country. You're simply a dumb motherfucker who never followed along, and never understood Donald Trump's presidency.

All about the $$$. Pro or Con.🍿 I like when they predicate their digital valuations with 'virtually'. Speaks Volumes to the myth of a Valuation.

Barely any sleep over night, after a verbal bust up with my housemate. I hate how people's housing situations are predicated on navigating complex relationships - be it a couple, housemate or otherwise.

Dynamic compound predicates are a bigger deal than they look: you can finally build a #Predicate from runtime filter lists instead of branching at compile time.

Barack Obama was using USAID to pretend to send money to a country for “aid” and instead laundering it to the Cayman Islands He would then use that money to fund and train “Rent-a-Riots” for protests to overthrow governments Sound familiar? Mike Benz on Joe Rogan: “A scandal during the Obama USAID era. We were running a number of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. — I'm simply showing the American people where your tax dollars are going and how these things are structured in order to systematically fool you and to fool Congress and to fool the White House: — USAID pumped $1.2 billion in, and we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, lose, learn how to use hashtags, learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knows where to go, what street to show up on, what kind of slogans to know, to use in order to create the pro-democracy predicate for it.” He talks about how Obama funded a Twitter clone that would be used to push propaganda in Cuba to inspire these protests and overthrow the government (Mike Benz explains how Barack Obama overthrew many governments) “So what they did is they took the exact same thing as Twitter, same user interface, same like, and retweet button zunzunio is, is the Cuban slang word for hummingbird. So just, it means it's it's bird, it was the Twitter bird, the whole thing. But the whole trick about it was you have to make it look like it's coming from the Cubans if you're going to do this operation — We can get into the deeper layers of this, but contractors were funded by USAID The data would then be used for micro targeting efforts towards anti and pro government users. In Cuba, the developers aim to, at first used non-controversial content such as sports and music and hurricane updates — What was the plan the whole time? Once they built up enough subscribers, they would begin to introduce political messages through social bots and encourage dissent in this, in this astroturfing — the whole point is, once they hit a critical mass, they would create ‘Rent-a-Riots” “You're using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You're saying it's, you're earmarking it for Pakistani aid.” But the money was never sent to Pakistan, it was sent to the Cayman Islands to fund this whole operation All this and much more is broken down extremely well in this video. This is INSANE

«Strada facendo, predicate, dicendo che il regno dei cieli è vicino. Guarite gli infermi, risuscitate i morti, purificate i lebbrosi, scacciate i demòni. Gratuitamente avete ricevuto, gratuitamente date». ~ Mt 9,36 – 10,8 🟢 XI DOMENICA DEL T.O.

I call BS-attending mass isn’t the predicate for being a good Christian

I find their uniforms to appear to be the most anomalous. What would predicate an Extraterrestrial Intelligent Species to arrive dressed in what looks like distinctively Traditional European Vestments?

#14giugno2026 #Vangelooggi #gratuita' Mt 9,36 - 10,8 Strada facendo, predicate, dicendo che il regno dei cieli è vicino. Gratuitamente avete ricevuto, gratuitamente date. La mia vita quotidiana sia testimonianza!

Questi sono i Dodici che Gesù inviò, ordinando loro: «Non andate fra i pagani e non entrate nelle città dei Samaritani; rivolgetevi piuttosto alle pecore perdute della casa d'Israele. Strada facendo, predicate, dicendo che il regno dei cieli è vicino. ->

Mesh data is read inline: @​height pulls an attribute, npoints() and nprims() give counts. Group uses the same engine: a predicate like ingroup("head") && @​normal.y > 0.5 builds the selection.

People don’t claim “stand your ground” as a defense in court. Stand your ground only eliminates the predicate of needed to retreat if your somewhere lawfully. But every other element of what use of force can lawfully be used during self a defense situation, still apply.

The important public claim is the ordering: structural admissibility first, pre-measure coherence second, measure assignment last. χ_coh is meant to select only those record-structures that survive joint embeddability under restriction before probability, observerhood, or effective dynamics enter the picture. The unary-predicate overlap case is the right next diagnostic, but it is also where the toy model begins doing real constructional work. I’ll keep that iteration private while the signature and maps are still stabilizing. For now, the narrow claim is enough: coherence should be a structural survival condition on records, not a probability condition imposed after the fact.

Exactly. That is the boundary I want to maintain for now. The public point is the ordering of the construction, not the full construction itself: record-relational admissibility first, χ_coh as a pre-measure coherence filter second, and measure assignment only after incompatible structures have already been excluded. The one-overlap predicate case is the natural next diagnostic, but it is also where the toy model begins carrying real formal weight. I am going to keep that iteration private while the signature, closure rules, and restriction maps are still being stabilized. For now, the claim is narrower: coherence should be defined structurally among records before probability, observerhood, or effective dynamics are introduced.

Yes, that would be the next clean diagnostic. A one-overlap case with a unary predicate is probably the smallest useful step beyond pure equivalence closure, because it tests whether restriction maps preserve not only relational entailments but also local labels/attributes without generating contradiction on shared records. That is exactly where the toy model stops being merely illustrative and starts becoming constructional, though. So I am going to hold off on iterating that publicly for now. But the intended test is as you stated: generate deductive closure under the chosen signature, restrict to overlaps, then ask whether relations and labels remain jointly embeddable before any measure is assigned.

What?? Mamdani banned watch parties in some areas bc of the crime...this is why there is never debate. You losers want to use lies as your predicate in ever argument. This is the mark of the imbecile or Marxist.

Predicate l'antifascismo di facciata ma appoggiate tutti i totalitarismi di sostanza. La Costruzione non parla mai di antifascismo ma di libertà, rispetto, diritti e doveri. Russia, Cina, Iran, Islam questi sono oggi i veri pericoli per l'Europa.

AI can now write mote authoritarively on most topics than 99.999 % of all humans. Like you, I have firm intuitions on how to apply the truth predicate. But other scientists and philosophers differ; and it’s no good my stamping my foot and saying, “I’m right!”